Кош

No. You are very wrong factually but it's not a subject of this thread, I suggest not to continue.

У кого-нибудь есть формула сигнала бланкирования который идет из РЛС в СПО?

null

Pilot-engineer is read as "pilot minus engineer"(vvs running joke, sorry). There is only one flaps extended position, and it's 25 degrees. Leading edge is 20 degrees both for takeoff and landing.

Потому что ТП очень по разному реализованы, на разных чувствительных элементах. Зато в МиГ-23 ТП не стабилизирован по крену и не предназначен для БВБ вообще. В 29 ТП сугубо для БВБ а ТП строб прикрутили я даже не знаю для чего. Максимум для B-1 на форсаже.

SPO-15 is tested for blocking with simulated signal generator at 500 KHz. HPRF of N019 is 160 KHz. To know what's going on we need to know how blanking signal at KJ1 line actually looks like at graph, and how does it relate to PRF.

Declassified Polish N019ЕА. I suggest to not spread misinformation about N019 using anything from Saphir and Ametist radars. N019 is built too differently overall, it's digital. There is sync, problem is finding how radar PRF to sync signal are related and with what timings.

Problem is 3 out of 4 Sparrows don't fall from rail to the ground in DCS like during Desert Storm. Either we get everything to factory spec or everything to how it behaved in the hands of military, but "everything for my friends, law for the rest" just doesn't work.

Please consider making NPL pages fillable with mission editor and scrollable when pilot model is on. Same for wind calculator.

well tracer bullets are expectable

Do you have real life experience with MiG-29? We have following FACTS: - SPO-15 in MiG-29 9.12 is connected to radar for blanking of forward hemisphere. - Rear is not synced. - ED agrees SPO-15 can handle MPRF in MiG-29 - Testing for radar overspill of SPO-15 device is performed at 3x the rate of HPRF of MiG-29 radar. What happens here, exclusively in MiG-29, like you insist, to prevent working exactly with HPRF despite SPO clearly being able to work with it?

Why? Latency? Frequency limits? What's difference with how radar deals with HPRF shutoff signal?

But MiG 9.12 avionics manual corresponds to this. That's a very particular aircraft.

Signal called same on other page in same document regarding SPO, and in SPO document the graph of duty cycle sync looks similar. Also, in tech plackards, signal generator simulating radar overspill is mentioned, used to test SPO for radar-proofness without turning the actual radar on in the workshop. There is not a single word about SPO being unreliable in the 9.12 avionics book. It just states that SPO is synced to blanking signal without elaboration, and I started to look for that naming on any graph, and found it. And not just anywhere - on HPRF graph!

This and at least 2 SME's, engineer and fighter pilot, from 2 vastly different air forces.

nullThere really should be no debate. ED modeled an unserviced system.

Приложите к монитору линейку. Зумьтесь пока ширина металлической рамы ИЛС не станет 169 миллиметров. Это его реальный размер.

@NineLineThis is not a wishlist. Repair the RWR please.

nullDeclassified Polish front(group of armies) plan. Notice D and number - that's objectives on day of operation. ROE is mutually nuclear.

It's soldered to the same cable as second button. Pilot in Ru forums said you can normally use either button but for consistency of procedures everybody agreed to use button 2 both for takeoff and landing. The block is re-used from MiG-23 where takeoff and landing settings were indeed different.

It's a known claim but no. Already solved in Ru part of forums with SME and mechanical scheme. There is phisically two positions for flap, and leading edge - leading edge is scheduled independently for optimal performance at all times.

It's an artifact of using an off the shelf flaps panel. In reality there is only two positions of flaps, in and out. Both TO and Land buttons do the same thing.

It would be more efficient to base expectations for a DCS MiG on a docs for a real MiG. MiG-29 and F/A-18 or F-16 are different aircraft with different performances, you can't say "It's a bugged model because it climbs faster than F-16", better say "It's a bugged model because it climbs faster than a real MiG-29 here's the graph's superposition of real and model". Now that would be "professional level".

I suppose technically IRST model just scans for any particles, but IRL smoke trails from missiles(unless it's a space launch) and smoke screens don't block or give any contrast to IR sensors IRL. Clouds do because they are made of water.

Radar cuts off even itself, not just SPO. It cuts off itself. And then this signal is just copied to SPO too. Othervise radar would have shown only a white wall at all times instead of contacts and clutter. So yes when radar is emitting, SPO is "closed". Indeed. You just have to understand this "disabling" lasts for 3 microseconds every next 3 microsecons. This is HPRF duty cicle, MPRF is much much easier.