Hammer1-1
-
Posts
3165 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Hammer1-1
-
Good. Let me know when its finally finished. 1.5 years untouched with no relief in sight screams dead to me, but you know...I guess you can refer it to as a brain dead coma patient at this point, but hope is what keeps you alive?
-
Sometimes its not possible. I had always thought that after VEAO, renegotiating every 3rd party contract to include another VEAO possiblilty that they would have demanded a stipulation in the contract that demands the surrendering of the module in its entirety if it was released in any way, shape or form for payment to customers. Since Razbams contract predates VEAO, that stipulation was never considered (stupidly), and here we are. I seriously hope that this has changed EDs position, and any/all contracts in place now includes these provisions so they can contract out the work.
-
Doesnt really mean anything; its a dead module.
-
might as well get your refunds, the modules are as good as dead either way.
-
So Im hoping I read that as you are also working on the A6E in MSFS as well? please say yes....
-
in order to use comms you have to use the mike key button if you have realistic radios on. I havent looked at it yet, but you would have 2 key types to map - one of them being for VOIP, and you only have two radios to work with. Make sure your radios are on so when you press your key, the menu will come up.
-
oh believe me it is. Matter of fact, its typical, except with a few 3rd party guys like Heatblur who seem to be able to knock out a module every 3 years from start to finish.
-
Development starts the moment they announce the work to do so. Not saying or suggesting they worked on it for 14 years straight, merely pointing out thats the average time from announcement to finish is 14 years, and thats typical with ED so far. And just fyi, the Apache isnt finished yet either, and its been...what? 3 years now? Yeah I stand by my statement. Also, I didnt say the F-18 started in 2008 either; merely pointing out that while FC2 was in development, they flung out screens of new 3D renders of both the Viper and Fulcrum. I dont find that coincidental.
-
They announced the start of the Apache A in 2008 when they asked for specific NSNs regarding public manuals. I dont think they were very far along or even started. When they started actual work, I dont know...but yeah. Same with the F-16C; they showed screenshots of the 3D model many years ago long before they announced official work on it...along with the Mig-29 and a few other modules I cant remember, but yeah. I honestly dont know when they swapped from the A model to the D, but even the F-18 went through several block revisions because they found more info and decided to go another way with a later block. So yeah, EDs models are well within the length of a decade when it comes to development.
-
Even if it were legal (not saying it isnt, its EDs code, so yeah they can), the F-15E is basically tarnished. Itll be, what, another 12 years of wait time AGAIN? the dev cycle for these modules is incredibly long. Hell, they started on the Apache in 2008.
-
and here I was thinking that I was going to raise a dead thread here, but SALVATION. Anyways...how is the A6 coming along nowadays? Id rather have this than the Draken quite frankly even though Ill take that too...but even an AI tanker would be great. Having the F-14 and F-4E in MSFS20/24 is nice too, but those models are neutered when compared to DCS. How about making the A-6 for MSFS and THEN porting it over to DCS? You already know most of us are going to buy the thing in both stores, why not work up and not down?
-
well, thats kind of what they're working on now. Apparently before VEAO, no contract written had stips that allowed ED to take command of the modules in case of abandoning work. Basically Razbam has the code and can deny it to ED out of spite if they wanted...which they kind of are.
-
once upon a time it was the ED F-15E....waaay back in the early days of development.
-
yep, the tradition of obtaining a release day and then putting it off for another 4-6 weeks because of some unforeseen last minute issue broke something and now its going to be 2 more weeks™. but dont jinx it...
-
its not just a hose nose, its basically driving this car from the back seat and trying to parallel park the first time. Come to think of it, probably easier to do that in the car considering the car wont spin you over if you overthrottle.
-
at this point Im kind of ok with that. its safe to say that Razbam is finished in DCS at this point whether they agree to come back and finish the F-15E or not.
-
I dont recall the navy having a big penor for the corsair because of how hard it was to fly onto a carrier....not really until the british come up with the earliest form of IFLOLS thats gyro stabilized late in the war.
-
Well, today would have been the patch "day" of the week, but the last few months it had been the first and last friday of the month; next one being DCS update and the followup being a campaign fix update. Dont expect it tomorrow, but be happy if it releases tomorrow. I know I will...I hate flying the Corsair in MSFS.
-
1 day 16 hours + 2 Weeks™
-
oh Im pretty sure that it will be included, considering that theres already tons of conformed skins already lined up for it. and if not, plenty of artists out there that will likely get to it pretty soon afterwards.
-
fixed it for you.
-
really wish it were the 4 bladed version, but any corsairs better than the mustang
-
exactly what I was alluding to. Im literally ok with passive eugenics in this case.
