TonyG

That’s correct behaviour per NATOPS. Either course line or Command Heading marker.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3300613/

Thank you very much!!! https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3539126&postcount=62

Is there any position from ED on this? This is a pretty basic functionality of tacan so I'm not sure why it's been moved to the wish list forum.

I can make out the ball on the carrier at just over a mile, ample room for CV1 approaches, and definitely workable for night approaches. The resolution isn’t what you get from a monitor, but I’d never go back to a monitor. Lots of people that have never tried VR like to badmouth it on the internet, maybe it’s sour grapes....IDK.

I've got the X-52, and alongside mapping all of the critical commands, I have the left and right click mouse buttons assigned to buttons on the joystick so I can look at a switch and not have to remove my hands from the HOtAS. I still use the mouse for stuff, but I like to minimize that.

I went from 16 to 32 when 2.5 was released. No benchmarks, but from just what I see and feel.....no difference in MP or SP. YMMV. 6700k@4.5, 980Ti, Rift.

Well, it's not fully implemented yet, and your first screen shot, you haven't turned it on.

I know....the silence seems to be deafening on this one. Server only licenses would assist with sales, as more people would design missions to go on dedicated servers, which is the only place they would be used. The $60usd for an additional license for a server only is unnecessary.

Is there any hope in the future for a server only map license? The ability to utilize more maps and have more MP sessions would be greatly expanded with this option.

Some people don’t see a point to any of this. However, this is a wish list thread, and someone is asking for an added bit of realism. I agree..... #needwhitepickups

I had this happen on a mission as well. The only thing I did differently was to try and set the position of the aircraft and then save it. When I tried to go back into the mission, the Hornet was stuck, no amount of power or key combinations would allow it to move.

Sounds very exciting Jar, can’t wait!

I think it would be cool to have it. As to real life....well it happens enough that the US Navy put a section in the NATOPs manual (pg 349) on how to handle manning the plane on the hangar deck.

I would think it’s part of the pre-mission briefing.

.

Hey...no payment needed. Happy to give back just a tiny bit to you guys for putting such an amazing package together for the community.

I do wish this would be resolved, as trk files are asked for to resolve bugs. If the trk files are bugged, how can we use them to resolve bugs?

OK, great picture of a Super Hornet.....looks like the heading caret to me, unless the Super Hornet also removes the heading caret to make room for the heading command marker. Again, please point out where in the NATOPS manual it says any of that about the Legacy Hornet? Review pages 748-752 of the manual and get back to me. I understand you’re in the navy or something, but it doesn’t automatically make you right. Again, the NATOPS manual and the behaviour in the sim clearly disagree with what you’re saying.

I’m aware they’re different. I posted the relavent sections showing that the Command Heading Market and the Steering arrow and dots are mutually exclusive of each other. Show me where it says you can have the course line on and also a Command Heading Marker on at the same time. I said nothing about ILS and posted nothing about ILS.

I’m not going to argue with you, if you can post the applicable notice or page from the NATOPS manual please go ahead. What is referenced in the NATOPS manual coincides with the behaviour in the sim. Are they both wrong?

An excel spreadsheet and reworking a bunch of the coordinates inside the mission file zipped inside the .miz file. The ‘Theatre’ being renamed is one aspect, but you have to then rework the theatre coordinates as well as the coordinates of the items inside the mission.

It’s a bug when the carrier speed is over 19 knots. The carrier’s speed in this mission is set at 30 knots, which simulates closely the wind over the deck you’d see in real life carrier ops. The solution seems to be reducing carrier speed to 19 knots and under and adding wind. The side effect of this is that you’ll introduce a rolling deck.

Mod for the meantime..... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=211557

Yes, you would set CSEL to the BRC.