Jump to content

Riverseeker

Members
  • Posts

    601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Riverseeker

  1. i have fc3 module so as you asked in the pdf i unzipped the package in C:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World\Mods\aircraft\Flaming Cliffs\Missions\EN\Campaigns
  2. Yesterday i finally finished the viggen dynamic campaign so i started this one to practice su27: first mission was the one about destroying 2 bridges, no problem, got that on first try but... after quitting i got prompted by the same error you reported in the campaign pdf. So i said myself, nevermind is a known issue. But also no accept cmd prompt was provided, no debriefing (txt one with objective percentage) I retryed it and the same stuff happened 3 times. Well i tryed the second mission: fighter sweep (my package) + ewrstrike +escort. Has gone pretty well becouse in 4 su27 + 2 mig29 (me +5 AI) we splashed 20 bandits, un fortunately a sam got my number 3 on bingo->RTB :( The ewr strike following my sweep had also a success. Same as the first mission: no txt debriefing, error on tmp log file. when i saw that on third mission the enemy had still all aircraft available i was sure there was something really wrong. BTW i played the whole viggen DCE without issues, apart from some stupid AI stuff or a couple of sorties really hard. Like striking alone, becouse wingman was not bombing a fuel deposit, without escort and finding 6 mig 29 on air on the target + AAA on the way and shilka :lol: Any idea? Becouse i like your caimpign and i would love to finish it at least one time :helpsmilie: thank alot for your effort on this :thumbup:
  3. make a pool and let's check... usually development must follow money direction or the whale is gonna sink.... :huh: that whas odd, i know :lol:
  4. Riverseeker

    Mig 29

    Ammazza è bello CICCIOTTO il su 24! Bombe a nastro :D
  5. Riverseeker

    Mig 29

    Eh bon, era solo una curiosità. Non è che mi aspettassi un "full fidelity", semplicemente un revamp, come sul su27/33
  6. Riverseeker

    Mig 29

    L'altro giorno ho fatto un giretto con il mig 29. Sinceramente è un bel mezzo ed è quello che (prendetela moooooolto alla larga questa :megalol:) mi ricorda di più l'f16 tra gli aerei presenti in dcs. Sopratutto è piccino, maneggevole e veloce Ma com'è che hanno spinto così tanto sul su27 ed invece quasi nulla sul mig29? La cosa che mi garba di meno è il trim up/down selvaggio... visto che ha una accelarazione alla star trek... E' stato revampato di recente? boh perchè a me pare ancora un po crudo come aereo. In ogni caso mi sembra ancora indietro rispetto agli altri fc3. :huh:
  7. Credo anch'io. :bounce:
  8. Va che non è propio così, il discorso ils è un pochetto più complicato. Ad ogni modo non mi risulta che l'F18 abbia qualsiasi tipo di capacità ils "civili" (al contrario dell'F16). Infatti, a farla breve può andare in divert su aereoporti civili solo se il meteo lo consente o se è in sostanza guidato da terra + tacan etc etc. fonte: https://fightersweep.com/1904/hornet-vs-viper-part-three/ Qualcuno conferma? Che io son nabbo :lol: Grassie.
  9. It seems to me that trees disposition is cahnging from map to map. This could lead so some wtf moments for mission builders... :beer: BTW is looking good.
  10. BTW whatching your AI escort doing his job is fun, even if it was expected. But landing and taxing to the parking spot while your sams/interceptor are running against enemy su25 and mig 29 has no price... just becouse it was totally unexpected (and a bit scary too, but for the sake of curiosity i've not insta-ended the mix) :cry:
  11. Well at the moment i am bombing sochi airbase and is taking ages doing it just by myself but with other 3 AI Viggen just looking a the sky... 4 AJ interdction could had crushed that straight to 40% 50% or even less I am stuck with that and it sucks a bit but not too much. It's still fully enjoyable experience! Last time i send them RTB straight after B1. :doh: On sead mission its a different story :thumbup: You can sit down and watch them blowing up stuff :cheer3nc:
  12. no post? check rams also (fried?) clean up ram and mobo pins too (dust ftw!)
  13. First of all, thanks for your advices! Anyway 2.1 atm is running smoother than 1.5.7 on my setup that is not a high end one. (founder 1070 +8gb ram + 2nd or thidr gen i5, i dont really remember, both slightly OC). Certainiy, when i play 2.1 i am always in sigle player doing small and easy training custom missions. Ofc aniso has impact on fps but i am not playing in vr so 60 is enough. Mate... i tested this heavily and i assure i found my sweet spot (on 2.1) just taking into account that: 1) civ traffic kills my fps (low is ok) 2) water level kills my fps (kinda ironic on a desert map :lol:) 3) mirrors are heavy but lighter than in 1.5.6 or .7 (on 1.5 i cant play with mirrors on, on 2.1 yes, but remember that i am flying different stuff) 4) clutters are fps killers (0 ftw! clutters are for vegans :megalol:) 5) visib range the one before ultra) 5) depth of field is a bad girl :music_whistling: (the rest is maxed if i remember good) btw i was just trying to understand why (in 1.5.7, release and not in 2.1!) after this patch i found my graphical config gone and after setting all the options back to my previous setup i see that distant lines on the runway are blurred, even at x16 aniso. I am not going to write all my graphical config but i assure you that loading a cold start mission, looking at the trees/planetraffic, with vsync on i have no impact on fps while setting aniso on x16 or off (ofc it is capped to 60 monitor htz!). Even with deferred shading on, since without it is seems ugly :D. Atm i am flying primarly 1.5.7 with viggen dynamic campaign and my setup can barely hold on it but it is a cpu/ram issue, not a nvidia issue. Talking about fps it is not helping me :cry: , i was just trying to understand why on my install the textures seems a little more blurred than before (or maybe i am getting old and i need to upgrade my eyes firmware :gun_smilie: ).
  14. I am going to try your suggestion tonight. anyway i tryed the control panel tweak 2 days ago and wasnt getting better fps. (my bottleneck atm is the cpu) My fps are fine, its just the graphical appearence that seems different from the 1.5.6 On 2.1 i have no problems at all, runway textures are good.
  15. its x16, seems maxed in the actual option ui.
  16. Well , so i am the ony one looking at the runway and finding texture a little more blurred than usual (i am using DCS_World_Ga-Bika_MODpack_1.5.X_Caucasus btw) I tryed everything, from nvidia control panel to shader delete.
  17. It seems to me that no matter what i do, aliasing seems crap on this patch. Anyone getting this feeling? :suspect:
  18. :megalol: Same with a bunch of other birds... for example in f5 you spawn in forced to do a cas with 2 aim9p and 3 fuel tanks...
  19. First of all thanks for this campaign. I restarterted 4 weeks ago playing dcs and i choosen to spend some time on a strike bird so i am playing this dynamic nordic asset. I feel noob so i have a question: how do you make your flight attack mission objective? When i am flight leader and we are attacking sochi airbase i cant make other AI guys to drop their bombs on hangars etc etc. I dont remember how to order that (sort of weapon free commnad!), and "go task mission and rejoin" made nothing happens :D. The second is more a consideration: usually strike flight packages split their routes before ingress points to reach the target from different angles but on the same time, rejoining in the egress. I've done 4 missions and this sort of plan is not imlemented, probably becouse it is a pain to implement. Btw you should give some more backgound to the campaign story itself. Anyway i like the feeling this stuff si giving to me. I'll buy you a :beer:
  20. Nella mia superficialità da volo virtuale trovo che il pregio maggiore dell'f16 rispetto agli altri aerei è il fatto che la cappottina è senza barre e giunzioni di metallo che ti sporcano il panorama :bounce:
  21. Azz mi sento in colpa perchè ho fatto svaccareil post tostalmente OT a causa di un mio vecchio ricordo... :baby: Su una cosa sembriato tutti concordi: give me the F18 FAST :helpsmilie:
  22. I thought meteo condition was already sat in the cardridge :cry_2: (never checked that btw) Thanks again :megalol:
  23. k, thanks for clarification. I have started a week ago to fly the bird so i dont know really much about it. I know for sure that in thunderstorm weather the nav system seems unusable, and just adding some wind sometimes make the system drift alot. No wind equal nearly no drift (on air). :thumbup:
  24. I cant see munitions, just the dispenser.
×
×
  • Create New...