Riverseeker

Ma i modelli 3d degli omini che spingono l'aereo per avviare i motori in prima come li avete vestiti? Da galeotti o da cheerleader? hype!

In generale i font han dato problemi sul 90% dei giochi, almeno inizialmente. Poi su alcuni titoli le cose sono migliorate ma in generale è "bastato" alzare l'opzione supersampling nelle impostazioni grafiche. ALchè tutti a smanettare con sta nuova cosa ma... Il problema è che il supersampling è PESANTISSIMO, a 2.2 si regge a fatica con la 1080/i7 OC. Sta cosa delle label/font/scritte è sempre stata un po un pacco in vr. :(

kk, got it. In fact i was expecting a major problem like that. Thanks for you answer :)

so far i've flown 7 missions and it seems to me there is something strange. I dont want to spoiler the campaign but: first mission was an escort to a fab strike, no red planes on air so gg. (i was excited anyway, atmosphere + sam + AAA o target were :thumbup: ) second miz same as before but i am in the strike package instead of escort (no reds on air and i was even more excited becouse i was blowing up things this time!) third was a night recon escort, no reds and wingman starts to loose formation at about 25kft (if i go to 45 as planned it stays around 20k and 50 miles behind :huh: ) here i started to think something was wrong with reds guys forth miz was a strike escort again on ewr, no reds. ewr destroyed mz 5,6,7 all night recon escort with no red planes on air... so i just stopped :D is this normal? Strike missions are really fine becouse targets are like 5 minutes away from nellis, fast miz. But i am getting 60% recon escort? All of them with exactenly the same flightplan and target? It seems weird. I've never seen a red plane flying in 7 missions :cry:

kk thanks.

Cioè raga parliamo di un modello di volo riscritto 2 volte? o era 3? Adesso non ricordo :D C'è un post in cui dichiarano chiaramente di aver riscritto in toto il codice del modello di volo. Do per scontanto che il modello di volo sia un pezzo importante no? o forse sbaglio? Potrebbe anche essere che il modello di volo siano 1500 righe di codice mentre l'avionica 250k o i missili 500k eh... Ma non penso peso sia così. In ogni caso non so dove trovino i soldi (o forse si, siamo noi che glieli diamo!) ma di professione faccio il programmatore e quindi capisco sti problemi; se devi riscrivere in toto un pezzo corposo del tuo codice vuol dire che (in ordine dal visto accadere meno spesso al più spesso): 1) Hai cappellato a scrivere il codice in partenza per inesperienza/poca lungimiranza e quindi quando ti cambiano una virgola il tuo lavoro diventa troppo complicato da gestire/aggiornare. 2) sei costretto a usare librerie/moduli aggiornati per implementare nuova roba e malauguratamente le nuove librerie (aka il codice della ED) ti costringe a cambiare un botto di roba. 3) ti sono cambiate (brutalmente) le specifiche sotto le chiappe e quindi si ricomincia da zero. (aka il project leader o il committente ha cappellato in piena) questa capita continuamente. Ho imparato a bestemmiare sopratutto con la 2, perchè li è propio la delusione più nera. La 1 vabbè.. capita, tutti possono sbagliare no? Magari era uno stagista! La 3... beh... avanti il prossimo va :megalol: e covolacci sua. Detto ciò ho il mirage (aereo che in sé non mi affascina poi così tanto ma è bellino!), aspetto le fix per le magagne che ancora si porta appresso; porto pazienza perchè tanto ormai ho pagato . Ma prima che io compri ancora un modulo della RAZ mi sa che ne passerà di agua sotto i ponti. Notare che l'ho comprato nel 17-10-2015... :doh: E sto ancora aspettando :huh: Chi è il pirla? :beer: P.S. sono io il pirla :D

Quick question are you setting radio channels for radio green/red? Becouse i am having some radio issues (btw on m2kc i've only done "official campaign" so i dunno how people are used to handle radio with dce+m2kc) Thanks

Some more observations: 1)Once obtained the air supremacy (aka obliterated mig 29 regiments) it starts to become way too boring. (campaign too long? too many objectives? maybe not enought strikes while you are flying?) 2) Tons of fighter sweep mission with no enemy (in nightime) 2b) Tons of fighter sweep mission with target waypoint in the range of sam stations (like the mother of all sam heaven camp spot :lol: ) 3) Alot of mission like: strike enemy parked aircraft while the airport is like full of sam and AAA. AI wingmen are dead in 10 seconds and diving to bomb in there is like sitting on bonefire. (some more sead maybe?) 3b) Alot of mission like: strike enemy parked aircraft and when you reach the target no interceptors are coming for scramble (even when there were still mig29 available). The takeoff for scramble only if: a) You turn on your ecm b) you are there as a escort for another striking package (first time it seemed like a trigger... it seemed unrealistic) c) you turn on you radar? (i am not sure about this) 5) Wingmen damaging planes on landing (even with low fuel and jettisoned weapons) 6) AI su-25T totally dumb: for example i was on a strike mission against 2 bridges and on the same route 10nm ahead there were 4 su25t against i dunno what. We (and them) had a waypoint exactenly over a sam + 2 AAA, their flight was obliterated in like 20 seconds. So Blue lost a package for nothing :cry: 7) Never saw a Tu-22m3 in flight, is this normal? 8 ) Mig 21 barcap are useless: 2mig21 vs 2 su25t/su30 result in a 2 mig21 lost and maybe 1 enemy plane destroyed (but at least reds dropped bombs during engage so their mission is failed) 9) there is always a su25t blocking AI access to runway 13 10) Enemy strike packages AI going always for the same route and you have visual on them at least once in your mission since they are doing your same flightpath but in the opposite direction. Ofc, they are strike packages, they engage only if you lock them on radar. Aka Ir missile/gun lead to duck shooting easy kill (one by one, drinking a beer and laughting at them) This is not true with su34 since they come from north runways. 11) flying 300km to drop 6 bombs for 10 times in a row its boring. 12) SAM target sites are impossible to overcome at the moment (becouse su25T cant do their job properly :helpsmilie: ) My very last opinion is that ending the campaign earlier could overcome some of these problems. Btw flying against mig 29 is fun. Hope this helps.

this should be sticked.

Mate i have that chip too and with thermaltake 360mm its a beast, in fact i love it but sometimes temeperature and consumption are abnormal on stresstest. Try to mine monero with that and tell me i it is not getting to 90° lol. The guys around me in fact are not using that chip to do crazy stuff anymore. I can assure you that no way any ryzen (even running at 4.2 for the silicon-lottery-jackpot) at the moment can surclass a i7 5Ghz... We tryed one month ago :megalol: Btw our i7 it's not stable a 5Ghz :(

i mean fast rams that are stable with ryzen, there is a page somewhere in the net that let you select the mobo and the ram compatible/goodOC for it, or the opposite. This of course if you want oc the ram to 3.2k. If some guy made a page like that it means that few months ago the net was struggling around theses issues. (in fact i waited few months before buying a ryzen setup) For instance i am sure that gskill flare (2 bank of 8GB each, not 4x4GB, its important becouse many guys had problems with 4 banks...) is working perfectenly with msi x370 gaming pro carbon with the july (31th? i dont remember) bios update. Just activate x-thing-ram profile in the bios and gg, ram stable at 3.2k. If you choose the wrong mobo/ram you are going to regret (if want OC that thing ofc). Anyway things are getting better couse bios now are a bit more mature... it's just personal taste and objectives. Intel side its more straight forward atm since these cpu are mature, fast and hot as hell :) Amd is a bit tweaky but looking to the future seems promising (i hope the am4 is going to last longer than actual other sockets...) boh! :smilewink: I dont mind intel or amd brands, i look for other stuff :thumbup: You could also wait for intel new cpu but i think you are going to spend more money on that newcoming platform and this is not responding your initial question. I am just trying to give the information i have so you can decide by your own without the inevitable brandbombing/fanboys stuff (btw i have a 1700 not a 1600x) Im am having better performance in 2.1 than 1.5 (i can use mirrors in nttr) Hope this helped :thumbup: P.S. threadripper is on another price range (like double money) and its just camed out :D

:lol: Tanto la cabina non è pressurizzata già di suo no?

If you want save money buy a ryzen, with the right mobo and the right ram. if you choose the wrong ram you are gonna regret that alot, pm me if you need a hint. If you have the right hardware OC on ryzen is trivial... For save money i mean from here to next four years. If you want right now max performance in dcs buy intel (and if you like overclock take a 6th generation becouse the i7700k its like 90° hot and you need to spend alot of money hoping to cool it down...) I own a 1070 founder ed: no matter if i try i7700k or ryzen, the fps are not changing when i overlock that videocard. (and for oc i mean going from 2700 to 3200 score in heaven benchmark with +600 on ram and + 200on core +100% voltage and 100%fans... :megalol: ) (ofc with vsync off! and 4K) This leads to the fact that the bottleneck it's always the cpu(in my case at least). Btw i play usually with vsync on and with both rig i was stable at 60fps, just mirrors and civil traffic are killers... :joystick:

Stavo facendo un po' di pratica con le dumb bomb e beluga sull'm2kc in nttr. (via fastmission) Prendetela con ironia ;) Ad un certo punto mi lokka un sam, alchè schivo una FLOTTA di missili (ammazza quanto sparano, manco fossero fenicotteri... :helpsmilie: ), mi riparo dietro una collina ed il sam mi molla per gli elicotteri... Ci penso su un'attimo e poi... vabbè proviamo a piallare con 2 beluga sta rampa... Ingress schivando ancora missili ma uno mi prende in pieno, tipo in the face propio eh, infatti mentre lo vedo arrivare già so che quello non ho modo di schivarlo e penso addio, questo mi shotta, era meglio me ne andavo! Invece l'aereo è ancora tutto intero :megalol: e cmq ho poco tempo per pensare perchè tipo 4 secondi dopo sgancio il carico e me ne vado via più veloce che posso. Spreco benzina perchè la sam è esplosa poco dopo l'impatto :thumbup:. Guardo nello specchietto e vedo fumo nero... niente lucine xrò sul pannello degli allarmi. Alchè realizzo che c'è una scritta sull'hud e passo alla visuale esterna... muahahha Forse non si nota subito ma manca un pezzo evidentemente non proprio fondamentale: il cappuccio del radar :doh: e li ero incredulo davanti al monitor, come un pirla. Incredulo non tanto per le condizioni dell'aereo ma per le condizioni del cockpit! Forse s'era danneggiato il pannello degli allarmi? Si ma almeno un bip dal master caution? Nemmeno per sogno :megalol: Quindi l'unico messaggio che mi da tutta sta fantastica avionica da milioni di € si riduce in: SPEGNI IL RADAR PIRLA! :joystick: Incredibile, mi sarei aspettato qualcosa di più, ma forse la spia "abbiamo perso la punta" non c'è sugli aerei :noexpression: Il bello è che l'aereo vola normalmente, nessuna vibrazione o scricchiolio o frusciio (solo un paio di colpi di trim col carrello abbassato) Morale: immancabile ovviamente il particolare dei famosi tarli dell'acciaio...

hanno messo sulserio i gabbiani/kookai in normandia? o mi prendete x il qlo? :lol: che se no vado di combined arm + footman soldier = aperta la stagione della caccia :gun_sniper:

davvero? c'ho fatto solo un paio di voli... :animals_rooster:

Avrebbe senso solo se implentassero le tute alari :lol: Quelle con la propulsione a rezione... :huh: ed in tal caso l'opzione birds funzionerebbe lo stesso? (mannaggia ho passato le ore a cercare sti maledetti uccelli in dcs per poi scoprire che era solo un effetto e che in realtà li avrebbero visti solo i motori... :cry: immaginavo sciami di fenicotteri )

:thumbup: About the map: it is working on other missions, but not in the campaign. edit: kk, looking with more attention i found the DCS bug, map just behave not correctenly on 4k... MEGA FACEPALM :| goint to report (about the aim 120: kk, just that after a FULL campaign on the su 27 i was dreamig about some aim120 spam :cry: :cry: :megalol: )

Secondo me l'aeronautica lo ama anche perchè ha fatto fare un salto in avanti a tutta l'infrastruttura e personale (non solo ai piloti). Personalmente l'f104 non mi appassiona troppo, come pure l'harrier. Sono inoltre daccordo con clafy: ED/Belsimtek e forse forse heatblur, altrimenti sto giro aspetto 3 anni prima di cacciare la pecunia.

First of all thanks for your work. I have 3 things to submit: 1) if you start the first mission 2 times and leave before even take off you win the campaing So why would you do that? (just start the first miz 2 times and exit?) 2) Becouse i wanted to load aim120 instead of aim-7, but if i change the payload i found myself only with aim9... Is this a bug or are you forcing payloads? Is there a way to go out with my personal payload? In the other dce campaign it was possible. (su-27 and viggen) 3)map seems bugged, it is moved all the way nord-west. Is this wanted? To force players to dont use it? If yes, is there a way to turn it to normal behaviour? :thumbup:

I can report you that i found a mission in which you are asked to do a CAP, that in reality is described (and planned) as an OCA, in which your package is armed with dumb bombs + 2 r73 and ecm. O_o So i edited in the mission planner to carry AA stuff. Doing that changed the parking spot of the planes, i should had taken a screenshot bu i forgot :| The new parking spot are really bad becouse the 4th bird is taking ages to get rolling and have to cross the whole base before the takeoff. This lead to being late on the target or the 4th on bingo at half flightpath (he is afterburn the whole time to rejoin). The mission is also really hard (overthere its like "they are coming out of the frigging walls!") so one more wingman is important. This is just for the sake of report a strange behavior. Campaign is still fun but could be even better.

So, it seems that i found what was wrong: my dcs was not started with elevated priviledges. problem solved and as espected was trivial. But now, there is a new question... Why (the hell :music_whistling:) is the viggen campaign working without eleveted priviledges? D'ho! :doh: lol!

well nevermind. Anyway i am going to format on monday for the new rig so i will clean up all the mods i've got installed. Maybe the problem is there.

The option Clean what is going to do?

in dcs.log is appearing also stuff like this: 5734.643 INFO DCS: AWACSDBG: added id - 16782080, whois - MiG-29S Pack 5 - Fulcrums - Fighter Sweep 1-2 05734.861 ALERT WRADIO: Error in wMessage::buildSpeech(), event = wMsgAWACSBanditBearingForMiles: [string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:488: Callname 0 not found for EWR 2 Radar ! stack traceback: [C]: ? [C]: in function 'error' [string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:488: in function <[string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:482> (tail call): ? [string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:866: in function <[string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:862> (tail call): ? [string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:939: in function 'make' [string "./Sounds/Speech/common.lua"]:1920: in function 'make' [string "Sounds/Speech/speech.lua"]:137: in function <[string "Sounds/Speech/speech.lua"]:116> (in fact awaks calls are not working atm) and like this 05869.352 ERROR VFS: VFS_open_write: CreateFile(Mods/aircraft/Flaming Cliffs/Missions/EN/Campaigns/Last Squadron/MissionEventsLog.lua): Unknown error 05881.291 ERROR DCS: Mission script error: : [string "C:\Users\Nick\AppData\Local\Temp\DCS\/~mis000063BC"]:124: attempt to index local 'logFile' (a nil value) stack traceback: [C]: ? [string "C:\Users\Nick\AppData\Local\Temp\DCS\/~mis000063BC"]:124: in function 'onEvent' [string "Scripts/World/EventHandlers.lua"]:13: in function <[string "Scripts/World/EventHandlers.lua"]:11> i am playing on 1.5.7 release.