fl0w

Just like the L-39, I feel like the C-101 will have its practical use of training and attack. I wouldn't mind at all for AvioDev to do some sort of bundle package with 2 C-101's, 1 for yourself and another you can gift so you can learn/have fun flying around as the F-14 also has.

I cannot understand how this works at all, but this is definitely awesome work! Is this able to also act like an MWS, or would that have to be done separately?

Definitely JH-7.

Looks like an official plan to release the Farmer this month. Looking forward to your work!

I was curious if there were any news or updates on the JF-7 being done by Deka, which were old renders of the external model posted on their Facebook page. Thanks!

Nice work! This will definitely be a reminder to he whom challenges the anti-skid switch. :)

I think you press a button and then use NUMPAD/horizontal number keys to navigate just like radio, except not a Function key.

Could also use some new PBR textures as well.

Not sure what embellishment it is since ralfidude delivered these types of videos since the MiG-21 review video.

Not every system is squeaky clean you could say. ;) Aircraft get worn out in life, so the radios weren't probably the best for its time.

And RAZBAM did the same thing with the Harrier by using Mirage sounds like a placeholder. What, you think they're going to re-invent sounds rather than borrow some from the only 1st module they have released? That sounds like a silly thought to me.

I think the static noise fits in well. It's open communication between you and JESTER while you're making the decision on what to say.

The F/A-18C PFM is in a DLL, so without making heavy modifications to make it recognize an SFM or your own custom EFM, it is not worth doing.

Please god, forbid GR ever getting hands on this module before EA. They make cringy, joke videos. Their Hornet consisted of "hey look I can fly with wings folded" and "OMG, look at my climb rate!" They even had a series for teaching people about aircraft, even though Cap was being told everything by another person... :doh: If anything, give it to the ones that will make the impact in the community on if it's worth the buying or not, especially the big ones.

That method is surely better. My method would at least have some heavy modifications for the systems (likely in DLL) meaning the Lua could just break the module. Have you tried of using DCS BIOS before? I've seen many DCS simpit owners use it.

I'm on a 6 core threaded AMD Ryzen 5, no issues here.

Hey guys, so I noticed that when I looked around in the DCS folders, the new Su-34 AI model was placed under the CoreMods path. Now normally, AI would never get this. The only aircraft (with the exception of the MQ-9, but it has no model files there) in CoreMods are only modules of DCS. Usually, AI models go under the Bazar/World/Shapes path, but it struck me odd that they chose this instead. Could this be pointing to a future module? Not trying to have my hopes up too high on this one. :pilotfly:

GR, GS, and DDG are on my top lists for not getting it. No offense to them, but they're just not the taste for a majority of people. Ralfidude and Crash Laobi however are good choices. Especially ralfidude, his reviews are very thorough and always show well of the module regardless the conditions.

Awesome stuff! For future reference, it is easier for us to see it by using the YOUTUBE tag. Just use like so. Looking forward to this EFM release!

Oh, wow! And here I thought this whole time that there was something a bit odd. Thanks! :thumbup:

Reserved post.

Hello, everyone. As the title of this thread implies, the C-101B/CC variants cannot do certain things while the canopy is closed. As far as I have tested, this is the current list: Re-arm Refuel Ground Electric Power EDIT: This has been addressed.

It was announced in the newsletter last Friday, and on AvioDev's FB page.

I think at least this model is being used for a video game sadly, and I don't think the owners would be pleased to be seeing a payware like content in for a free game. :(

I hope Nick sees this question: Will we be learning exactly the systems or the startup involving systems in Episode 2? Very intrigued. Thanks for such your hard work!