tosmonaute

DIMITRIOV, t'es trop toi... J'adore tes réalisations, sacré boulot ce mod. JE SUIS ACCRO:thumbup: Merci infiniment.

+1 Would buy the 2000-5 ... even i already have the C. It is a must have for me.

-1... No blood needed

Excellent , thank you so much !!!:thumbup:

+1

Totally agree with you Sir Gus! +1

+1

:thumbup:YES YES YES +1

:thumbup:Thank you so much Backy! Excellent and very helpful guide

Furiz!!! You read my mind... :thumbup:

@FlankerKiller, I am just like you, i have a preference for 60's to begin 90's jets. Modern planes are so efficent, make them not fun as old birds in in''BVR'' and dogfights(it is just my point of view, not meaning to be the reality for all). 23 is on the progress, i believe we can have the 29 could to become a real project in futur. Yes i want the 29 in DCS.

Yeah would love it, i totally support that point. I believe the ground crews will come to the different airfields in futur. They did the carrier, i do not see any obstacle to become the standard in the airbases.

I would love to have my DCS on linux. But unfortunately, i believe SharpeXB is right! The game market is not on linux. You are right Fri13 about servers etc, but for game what is really the weight of Linux?!?!! Honestly i do not believe it might happen. Hope i am wrong.

Let's pray Buzzles is right! This would be a great news for DCS, if it is really on the cards. Wait and see...

Oooohhh yes

Yes SharpeXB, it would be lot of work for sure. I understand your point of view. But it is exactly the reason why i did disable the pilot, just because i cannot see switches and knobs. Not because i prefer an empty cockpit, btw it would not need the whole body to move, but just the arm or the leg. You are right economically they have other things to do before this, it is only a new option wish list .

Why not? For sure it is an heavy work but DCS is an healthy going business! I believe it could bring much more people to DCS... Imagine fly an C5 Galaxy, P3 orion anti sub missions, KC10 or KC135 refueling missions etc etc... Economically don't you think it could be worth the work? This could be a base with new ATC and a new weather system for a DCS 3.0

Yes Fri13 it is exactly that point i wanted to show in my DCS wishlist. They should consider work on this limitation, it would give a new dimension to DCS WORLD. Just look at that Shinmaywa ! sweet

All i know is : RAFALE and TYPHOON are beautiful and efficient machines... And i won't buy a module just because one is superior to the other, but just because i love planes... So i am sorry but i do not understand the point of debate who's the best of them in this thread! BTW the TYPHOON module is already announced if i understood well( and for sure i will buy it), and just to answer to the thread. YES i would love so much to see the RAFALE in DCS. And if it could be a M version, would be even better to me. I really hope it will become reality someday.

I believe 4 engines in our favourite flight sim , should become a futur evolution in DCS World. It would open DCS to many birds! Tankers, WW II Bombers ETC ETC... Any chance this become real someday?

Oh yes just saw now, Was too excited ! Dream is gone. Je chiale...

Just like LowRider88, i think the pilot body bring more immersion in VR. But there is always a moment we need to see some knobs or switches under. Sirrah is right, simply with the cursor over a panel, the leg or arm hidding the panel could move out... Should'nt be that hard to implement! And it would'nt be just a gadget but a real tool for immersion. Because an On/Off on my HOTAS... it's an immersion killer for me.

+1 It is really violent for my poor eyes in VR...

I agree with you LowRider88! If they could implement a way to move the legs or arms when we look at a panel, would be just great.

+1 for the MIG29. We need more red birds for sure. Btw if they could focus on Cold War, red and blue birds (60's to 80's), it would make exciting (fox1/fox2) dogfights.