tosmonaute

Thank you Home Fries for your help! Well it is the way i did it, all are in Saved games/DCS Open Beta(or DCS)/Liveries/ aircraft folder. I use also several of your skins (F18, A4 etc)and in the middle of the hundred skins i have, it's difficult to know which are making problem. If i remove some then the problem may happen with other skins... BTW it overlap LUA files not textures! But what i do not understand is why for exemple a F14B skin can make problem with a P47D??? They are different folders and i do not understand how the lua description of a F14 is related to P47?!!!?? As i said i know nothing about programming and lua, so for sure i am wrong in my logic. Once again thanks for your help

Hi, I am not sure if it is the proper place to ask about this skin installation question but?!?! When installing skins via OVGME, some liveries make appears the message : ''files overlap with the already installed mod''. So afraid of breaking the integrity of the previous skin, i just stop the installation of the last one. And this happens with same or not same plane. My 2 questions are: 1) what to change in the lua skin , to not affect the previous skin? 2)If i do install it overlapping the previous skin will this make the previous one unusable? Sorry for the noob questions but i have no knowledge about skinning lua etc... Thanks for any help or information.

+1 for me too

+1

+1

Totally agree with you, the Falklands theater(for me the big one to own) needs all the warfare related to this war, AI material as well. I expect so much from the Falklands/Malvinas project. Would be just dramatically frustrating...

If a F4E and an UK FGR2 to become real yes i would buy both.

Is the MIG29 A the only one version we can expect? Any chance for an more recent version to come?

Yes FGR2 for sure is the one that should be planned! Personally more interested in this one than US versions(excepted F4E).

Fiat G91, Mirage 3, F8 Crusader, Buccaneer, BAE Lightning F6 are my top wishes

+1

Razbam please do it and i will buy it,even i already bought the C version. And for sure i won't be the only one! Mirage 2000-5 is +1 for me

Totally agree with youNorthstar98 i prefer also 70's to late 80's, but about the Phantom i would prefer one of last versions. And the Buccaneer would be just orgasmic to have it...

Totally agree with QIOU87 Nothing more to say

+1 we need it ! Afterburner + stop/ idle setting please ED. It will not be luxury.

+1 for me i would love to see the P38

It would be great for me to see in DCS, more cold war era birds : JAGUAR UK or French Versions, TORNADO IDS, BUCCANEER, SEA HARRIER, F8 CRUSADER, FIAT G91, any F4 Phantoms and the BAE F6 LIGHTNING.

GOOD IDEA +1

+1 I totally agree with you imacken With VR it can be problematic to hit the F10.

Can't wait anymore to see the new clouds! The clouds driving me nuts, i just cannot fly with cotton clouds... Immersion destroyer.

As some said before, yes i would buy it. If it keeps the spirit, realistic urbanism and geography of the region it represents... Could be very interesting for trainings. I would not buy it if it is an totaly abstract map. A good way for fictional maps could be like: Mediterranean map with lot of islands( Greece, Cyprus kind of geography for exemple). Scandinavian map( some Fjords mountains and sea). Asian map (something mixing Vietnam and Korea coasts and mountains geography). Etc etc... For sure i prefer real maps, but i see no reason to not create some generic maps. DCS Community is made of so many different people with so many conception and interests about DCS World, not everybody expecting the same from DCS. Some want dog fighings, others only want to fly! And btw some other games did the same(Granturismo) mixing some real and some fictional or generic maps(call it like you want) and it worked fine, even if yes i know, it is not the same. For me the most important in DCS is that laws of physics, systems, engines, weather etc... are realistic as tech make it possible. If this can bring more people to DCS, so why not? And if this can help to produce some maps more easily and quickly without problems of rights because of some nations authorizations, so yes i am totaly ok with it. Some people only want real maps, ok so just buy real ones! Definitively +1 for me (even i would prefer to see a full world like in the last Flight simulator).

Obrigadinho !!! Acho que vou esquecer o rtx3090... Mais vale comprar o 3080. Agora ja sei o que fazer. Obrigadissimo Pilotasso!

Oh yeesss this would be a good add. Please anyone do it!!!

@ SkateZilla Actually considering to buy an RTX3090, the most delicate question for me is: Is it worth to buy it? the question is not if the card is worth it of course! It is just hard to have an idea of what technology or new improvements(weather, graphic, etc) ED will bring to DCS in the next following 5 years!!! Of course my VR experience will be much better for sure. Will DCS give us a major graphic evolution to justify ,i burn my bank card for such Graphic card? Thanks for any available info you might give, it would help many people to decide what to do. Because i am really lost

+1 for more Callsigns for each nations i agree with JonathanRL