dundun92

So a quick overview of the testing ive done with the R-27/77s. Feel free to comment with testing of your own. So for straight line flyout, the R-27s are unchanged, while the R-77 is about 10-15% better than before. Also, the R-77 motor burn time was reduced by 1 second to 5.1 sec, but thrust was increased from 22kN to 27kN Lift has been increased for both, but moreso on the 27 and it is quite impressive close in compared to before. Heres a vid with the current R-77 (the first launched) and the current ET. Shots are roughly at 2nm vs a MiG-29 crossing right to left at mach 1.2: For comparison heres one with the AIM-120(both B and C): And heres one comparing the R-77 to the R-73: I havent yet tested bleed rate but id expect it to be reduced by quite a bit.

Can you post a video, showing your control inputs with the ingame window for it?

Definitely not one RN, and im not sure one exists IRL though I could certainly be wrong here.

Though Ive seen plenty of people online get panicky over just a simple spike:megalol:. Srsly tho what half-decent opponent is gonna go defensive vs a Mirage at 20nm? The MAR for the S530 is nowhere near that far at any alt (unless maybe at like 50k and M2+). EDIT also attentive pilots will notice the lack of smoke trail as well

I take it you didnt see this thread? ;) https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=280422

Yep thats the thing I cant seem to consistently reproduce it. Its 100% a bug, but its very intermittent, and I as of yet cant find a pattern to it.

Were these tests simgleplayer or MP? If so, missiles on the old chaff model (SD-10, AIM-54, R-77) have much worse ccm resistance in SP. You saw this with the old 120s, they were super easy to chaff in SP, but the new chaff model fixed that for them, and now its the same SP and MP.

Exactly how do you know this is an "easy" fix AliPG?

Making up conspiracy theories certainly isnt gonna make ED fix it any faster. Stick to the bug itself and youll be MUCH better off.

Nor was that F-18 bug patched immediately, as shadow said it was quite a while before it got fixed

Also, your seriously denying that the R-73 has PN? Really pepin?

From the exact source pepin posted: The missile guidance system employs an updated proportional navigation method [b]with the target lock-on accomplished on the suspension under the carrier.[/b] So unless anyone has any specific credible evidence to the contrary, it's safe to say no LOAL for the ET.

Probably unrelated but I did have issues in the mirage earlier today with AIM-54s not showing on RWR, all I saw was the 14 launch warning.

SHOW US THE QUOTE. Like really. You keep on saying that the manufacturer said it has LOAL, but you have provided ZERO links/qoutes/sources.

Just my 2c but I think 99% of players will encounter this and legit think the JF STT locked them, I dont think they would be aware that the JF is actually in TWS. I really dont think this is an issue of people noticing and not reporting just to gain an advantage. Youd need a squadron environment (specifically a squad that flys the JF a lot) with constant missile testing to really specifically notice this, nothing like on an aiqruake server.

In other words you dont have to give proof of your claims of fictional features, but you demand it from all those "fanboys" "in opposition against Russian" when they object to questionable/unreasonable claims that you make?

Umm theres plenty of F-15 info out there, you can easily find its -1-1, like we have for the F-16.

As long as deka models it as realistically as possible within the DCS framework, which theyve been doing, i am happy yes. Isnt that what we all want?

I didnt demand a track, Im just saying that anyone can say that X missile is too easy to defeat, without a track/tacview, or even a simple description of whats going on its useless. Also if you ask me AMRAAMs are still too easy to defeat:

Yep lol

a, 104th allows hotspawns now b, the 104th has been running blue v blue for a while, thats not what caused it. Infact, theyve been running blue v bluw longer than most other airquake servers. This has specifically been an issue over the past month or so. Today and yesterday we did have some really good fights tho.

No he doesnt, looked at his track, he overrode it.

Nobody is interested in what you think is "key", its a simple yes/no answer that your track already answered: you overrode LA, so obviously the missile will fly straight until it finds something. Its not meant to be overridden IRL.

Raero is 53nm at alt, you said the shot was 34nm so kinematically this is well within range. The issue is the seeker which should cap it to around 25nm in this secnario (DCS MiG-21 has an RCS of 3m^2), but dcs doesnt model SARH seeker limits afaik. As for the battery life, thats really odd, in the files its supposed to be 75 sec.

You guys realize the next patch isnt until the 19th?