gcze

During climb , the altimeter sometimes it doesn't switch from radar to pressure (RHM LD) on HUD, freezez on 570. RHM/LD switch is no longer solenoid.

I almost made successful takeoff with broken landing gear! Now the simulator forgives too many mistakes. It is very far from the reality, that should looked like this

Therefore i wrote, almost It,s possible, but on crash landing rather then hard landing. I was try to check if the landing gear jam is now properly indicated on annunciators , but i can;t do that without crashing the plane. I couldn't damage the tires at all, even at very high speed during the take-off.

The landing gear is now almost indestructible. Is it intentional?

- Completly inacurate performance - Advanced codes for RB-15 doesn't work - wrong or lack warnings where deploy rb15 not meet parameters. - completly wrong behawior landing gear and warnings relatd to them on panel - lack of calculate Vr (simply hardcoded speed), wrong, and very simplified fuel calculation - lack of all serwis data (ID-NR) - can use weapons on ground - wrong behavior time on target, and missle on target. - close to the airport, always want to calculate plan from the airport, not entered manualy runway point. - very simplified ground radar. - lack of possibility selection salve, single mode ARAK ( ground crew) If something is not in the HB manual, it doesn't mean the AJS-37 didn't have it And many, many other things, described on many others posts/topics, above things from memory, last time i didn't fly Viggen.

I disagree. Viggen has a huge amount of bugs and flaws that make the more advanced features useless, expecially in mutliplayer.

I noticed the appearance of the MFD fonts behaving very strange depending on the distance in VR FAR close to the eyes FAR close to eyes When I use the zoom from a distance fonts is blurry. It can only be seen on the MFD, not the HUD. Probably this scaling is causing problems with MPCD fonts in VR

Yes, I think I saw it all, maybe described differently. If one is not there, I will report it in the future. Now I don't see the point. Enough is waiting already submitted.

I didn't mean new systems, just fixes to existing ones : - wrong trim logic and lack of center rudder trim indicator - wrong landing gear logic, completly useless gear warning - wrong ToT and time on missle calculation, when more then 1 waypoint. - wrong RB-15 modes, inoperable codes, crash on water on multiplayer, lack indicate blocked release when don,t meet conditions to shot. etc. - wrong navigation logic, after overhead, over L1 disabled bearing B1 - completly wrong performance data, almost half real range on 9k ceiling - miscalculate range with payload - ternav working without data cardridge in socket. and many others I'd like to see regular fixes for old problems, not fix packages every 2 years.

Could it be a break for another 2 years with major updates for Viggen? Any systems updates in live roadmap? I only saw some graphical fixes there. Graphical tweaks are cool, but systems are more important to me.

A similar problem with airport radio presets. There are more airports than presets available, and impossible to program them yourself. Maybe at least a configurator in a text file, custom.conf or something like that?

No, it will be JA-37. I guess

This patch, brings more than i expected. THANK YOU! I would like to see symilar amount of system fixes in future.

Viggen work only in single player. CTD on enter slot, start mission, each server.

I checked it a few days ago, unfortunately changing target approach it does not work.

5 years is probably the oldest Early Access in DCS? I appreciate the heatblur work, many systems are made very well, the more annoying are all these small bugs. Lacking some 3d models, knobs, switches animation, lighting, missing animations toe brakes, trims, and various minor bugs in systems. Cockpit model, and texture quality look outdated, especially compared to the F-14 I bought the F-14 and I like it very much, but Viggen is more important to me and I wish it was full made and 100% compliant with the flight manual. HB did a lot of additional work that is not available in other modules, such as generated missions from reconnaissance cardridge data , frequencies of airports in radio presets, usefull additional data in kreeboard, elint file, custom data cardridge, shared data from F10 cardridge. If there was such a need, I could pay extra for it. Maybe HB would make a refreshed version with an additional, old AJ like F-14A/B or with a new module JA

SN_42 - Robo - Blue - AJS37

+1 Problem with ranging. Laser randomly - don't work, stuck on one distance, or show inproper range value. After several ranging system restart, work as intended.

This error has occurred since the multicrew was accidentally deployed.

Jester talking too much. He often does not finish the sentence and starts a new one, repeated the same message many times. It was different in the past.

No, that's Index problems. LCD = no black. double fresnel lens = terrible glare Black level and color saturation are a problem in all HMDes with LCD displays. Samsung uses OLED. These problems are not felt in games that are not dark and do not have too complicated lighting. Valve Index has much better tracking and controllers, but this is not important in DCS. Sorry for my gogle translator language ;-) ps. I prefer samsung Odyssey without plus, it has a picture like vive pro without anti sde. (anti sde gives a little blurry image)

Samsung O. has hardware ipd adjustment like Valve Index.

I have Valve Index. Terrible glare, no black, shimmering. Nice HMD, but Samsung Odyssey works better in DCS for cheap price. Wysłane z mojego LG-H870 przy użyciu Tapatalka

IPD or different resolution, WMR = 1440x1440, Samsung Odyssey/Odyssey + 1440x1600

It looks like it remixed forced the native resolution of Oculus Rift :-/ I bought gtx1080Ti, it would be so cool to play with Samsung Odyssey.. It's really frustrating. The problem has been known for over a year. Currently, Samsung Odyssey is probably the best headset for DCS and I can not use it. :cry: