Jump to content

Tom_

Members
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Tom_

  • Birthday 12/02/1999

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World, IL-2 Strumovik: Battle of Stalingrad, MFS2020
  • Location
    Netherlands
  • Interests
    Gaming, Programming, Flying

Recent Profile Visitors

1416 profile views
  1. ED is a company. I will never blame a single person. If something went wrong it is the wrongdoing of the company. If for some reason it had to wait until you got home from whatever you were doing that should make me feel bad for criticizing ED the editing of list should also have waited.
  2. From what I saw there was an hour between Wags posting his explanation and the list being changed. This is not a message that looks like it takes an hour to come up with. I am all for setting realistic expectations but it has to be done in a respectable manner. And I am of the opinion that this has not been done in a respectable manner.
  3. You mean transparent as in we first have to complain and then we get an explanation?
  4. Why are the goal posts being moved now? Why has ED not determined these goal posts at EA initial release? Moving the EA release goal posts during EA development is (imo) not a thing that should be done without very careful consideration and COMPLETE transparency. Why could ED not have simply made a NEW post with a list with a NEW name instead of CHANGING the old post/list? What is wrong with the old list? What did the old list even mean? To me it seems like the old list was between a EA release points list and a "eventually we want to do this" list. Some people bought the F-16 expecting that list to be done when it eventually would leave EA.
  5. Wags should have explained that before it was removed from the list. Actions like this are shady and ED has received criticism for actions like these in the past. I don't see what is keeping ED from learning from it. Also I did delete my previous post since it had an error in it and a wrong reply
  6. I am aware yeah. So far I seem to have found a few options that won't break the bank too much. But until the buttons and 3D frame is done I won't do anything with screens. I am planning on setting them on my desk or selling them for material value to a friend of mine.
  7. Yeah I thought about that as well. But the TEDAC extends. And I preferably would like to keep it kind of like the real aircraft. (I want to make a setup that covers both the P and CPG station.) Also if I want to be extremely picky both MFDs seem to be slanted (I think this is the right word). They are not completely flat like most MFDs in jets. So that is why I am looking for smaller screens that are roughly the same size. But it is a good solution of I cannot find anything in the end. If I do find anything I will post it here though.
  8. Hello everyone, I am currently trying to create a simpitTM myself (it'll will be jank because 1. I'm a student and 2. I have no space at all). But I am running into the problem that I want to have a screen for the TEDAC and MFDs that is roughly the right size. I was wondering if anyone has found any screens that wont cost me and arm and a liver to buy.
  9. @BIGNEWY @NineLine Sorry for the tag but this has been here for a while with no response. Thanks
  10. this just screams "GIB"
  11. +1 from me. GIB bomber mossy. Of course after the current version is ironed out
  12. P47 hyd bug.trkI tried it in single player. still behaves like that. here is the track.
×
×
  • Create New...