RustBelt

It would take me close to 2 hours to get to the point of taking 30 seconds.

We do have level bombing tables. It’s just not in something shareable on this forum.

Keep in mind, in the past you were eventually going to have a crash to desktop doing that too much. I guess it doesn’t (or didn’t) clean up after itself unless you leave the menu.

Wait so is this a brakes issue, or just a wheel rotation animation issue?

That sounds like a You and Steam problem.

Mmmmm over center very nice.

I mean, I always do when I RIO. You’ll have to talk to your friend. Did you mean will JESTER?

To say noting of the amount people talk about it now, a malicious entity KNOWS people have their DCS folders excluded now.

Dude is that Aviation Mahogany Ply? or just a really lucky stain job?

I mean, option 3 is ED stops using VMProtect.

I recall them talking about slat wings way back. So yes probably J or S.

Is it possible Wags is just incorrect and the DCS F-5E is just representative of some other buyer nation, not the Swiss? Who else got the RWR, didn’t buy AAR, didn’t buy digital Radios? Also was Swiss 1976 tranche digital radios and INS?

How long ago? And also Wags says a lot of things that…..turn out different. The split up middle east is still pointing to a future globe model implementation. So Vietnam in pieces may be possible now. Either way, unless they’re already working on it, I doubt ED is going to say no if a 3rd party walks in with the offer.

Which is “closest” equipment wise to the E? Because it’ll probably be that one.

This is just Beautiful. I’m speechless!

Yea I’ve seen motorized sliders but never Rotary ones. Edit: oh wow only $15 too. Not bad at all. The amount of hidden stuff in parts catalogs you never see unless you know to look for them… also with that rig how are you overcoming the outward force on the 90° gearing?

I’ll give you nothing and you can do as you please with that.

it's like neither of you are paying attention and just using high school forensic club rules.....oh yea, internet, I forgot that's all the internet is. Carry on, have "fun?"

Man you REALLY need this to be a “simulation” you got a bet on the line or something? Call your toy whatever you like i suppose. It doesn’t mean it can’t be accurate, but it also doesn’t mean it can or will be perfectly accurate, and the makers get to decide how accurate it is. The pretending it’s accurate is the Kayfabe. I don’t see how you don’t get that? Do you need me to call it the “meta game” or “meta play” for it to reconcile with your needs from this product? And since you brought up historical reenactment, I mean we going to pretend this is different? Why? Because it’s less exercise? Unless you’re the Iranian air force, you aren’t using this thing as a training tool.

Dude, that's a home computer game. Don't confuse game genera with technical terms.

Super Green!

Emulation is a recreation of the hardware with the ability to run the original software. Simulation is A recreation of a system so it behaves the same as a system. That means it requires a 1:1 interface or a Simulacra of that interface. Simulacra is the impression of a system that works within the bounds of the larger simulacra environment. Partial task trainers are Simulacra. If you use a mouse to click on visual representations of controls or an HID button box not matched to the control, it’s simulacra. same too if you use a look up table and simplified environment modeling it’s a simulacra. Baked in flight models are simulacra not simulation. CFD is a simulation that builds a Model for use in a Physics informed modeling simulacra environment. I an saying it’s old Hearsay. High quality, well informed Hearsay, but 20 year old at the newest remembered and restated accounts. In a simulation you wouldn’t need that, because reproducing the systems would give you the actual behavior in a high fidelity simulation environment. This Simulacra is more like a physical story we engage with. And this is where the Kayfabe comes in because this is a ludo-interaction NOT a flight training simulation product. We all “Agree” together for the sake of play that this is a reasonable amount of “correct” for our play purposes. HB tries, but even HB is softening some edges for play effectiveness. As is the total interface as a whole. I’m not sure what evidence you want that is not already provided by both ED and HB white papers and explanations. You want to talk Evidence, show ME where ED or HB guarantees ANY specified, quantitative Values of “Realism”, accuracy, or Fidelity. They made and you bought a toy, a story made to interact with something that is an Idea of a thing that was in real life. It’s Pretend, and so Pretend in play has Kayfabe.

Zeta Gundam when?

Yea that’s called Kayfabe in Circus and Wrestling. These are not system simulations. They aren’t emulating an actual AWG-9. They’re making a facsimile. Something that acts like one within the capabilities of reverse engineering it from manuals and old hearsay. And within the limits of the game engine it exists in. The piles of documents is part of the “play” of the sim. They try to get close, but it’s still fudged in order to work right. They (ED) just decided to lighten up on the Kayfabe. To expand their available products.

Yea well, m Hype video is hype. That’s all.