Jump to content

RustBelt

Members
  • Posts

    1930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RustBelt

  1. Because it was in a video like 2-3 YEARS ago when. Syria dropped. To ED it’s old news.
  2. Not couldn’t, they had gone on record saying they wouldn’t. And “Officially” according to HB themselves, they still haven’t said they WOULD make it. It was just sales puffery (actual legal term of art) in the Hype video.
  3. You know the secret to fixing that, stop ever promising it. There’s plenty of modelers out there who can pump out AI. FF devs shouldn’t even talk about AI external only AI flight model. How many all white vaporware planes have we seen at this point across DCS? DCs isn’t exactly hurting on model makers. I mean, I assume ED is paying for assets. I prey the module devs aren’t just doing this work out of the goodness of their hearts. Given that even Nvidia can’t figure out how to add more VRAM, I’m all for lower res base model. 4 and 8K textures are getting insane.
  4. The “And Beyond” always does a lot of the work in These videos. Yep, perfect is the enemy of Done.
  5. You gotta provide actual data not pictures. I’m sure buried somewhere there is a pass-fail specification for the Tomcat’s gun. Find that, reproduce the test as best you can in DCS, and then go from there. keeping in mind that the new F-35 DCS is less…..mmmm concerned about perfection.
  6. What mod was it so people can watch out for it?
  7. It’s checking because other than SHTF ROE, you never trust the datalink to perfectly correlate with what your radar sees. Jester runs a more restrictive ROE than you want to play. It would be neat to dial that in on the fly. But, right now, that’s what Jester do.
  8. You lose resolution doing that. Say you halve Y+ now you only have say 1000 increments to cover the limited travel and not say 2000 increments (i have a weird headache so can’t lookup actual 12 and 14 bit axis numbers, but you get the point) Put the screen closer, that’s way too far away. Better field of view, better readability. Just forward of the panel would be ideal.
  9. Ooo extrusion in place of DZUS rails, smart! Needs a goose neck the real stick has a displacement from the pitch axis to get it back and out of the panel. Unless you’re using the actual mechanism, you need to adjust your stick situation to fit the grip in the place it occupies IRL. Each stick base being diffrent. Work from the top of the wrist rest DOWN to solve where the gimbal base goes. Also don’t be surprised if it’s tilted slightly forward or back. As long as you have full authority, it doesn’t matter.
  10. I mean, you never will until it shows up on the changelog. Unless you speak Russian and can talk to the actual Devs, not the go betweens stuck in the middle.
  11. “Personal attacks” is where things really take a turn. WTF?
  12. Rare only matters in precise historical reenactment. Using Zuni's is pretty rare. They’re still there to use.
  13. If it wasn’t officially announced, what was it doing in the “what we’re gonna do” video? Also to others, Early-A was a later addition too. It was B, late A, forestall, and some AI A-6. That’s all that was in the initial plan.
  14. I mean, ask in the server. Some assets are set to invincible in a number of servers I’ve used. Especially AAR because nothing cures frustration like a full mag dump.
  15. Isn’t that already available? I have one or one very much like it living in my “Someday when I get a 500x500x500mm Core XY” folder.
  16. F4 Jester isn’t a RIO. It’s a Weapons Systems Officer. The Airforce had different priorities and crew concepts from the Navy especially in the F-4 days. Front seat fought, back seat bombed and supported the radar.
  17. Be nice if there was anything prepared to follow up the video with. As opposed to “I donno…….Maaaaaaaayyyyybe…….”
  18. It’s the F-14B(U) upgrade. “Sparrowhawk”. best images are in back of the JADAM paper https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3487&context=utk_gradthes
  19. Yes full OFP321 includes HUD and JDAM. As well as CDNU and GPS from OFP320.
  20. Meaning it’s a Light feature, meaning it isn’t an easy fix because dcs cockpit lighting and the F-14 are barely on speaking terms.
  21. Once you see “this is on the DCS side” there’s literally nothing Heatblur can do, and DCS is on DCS’s “schedule” so expect delivery some time between Two Weeks, and the heat death of the universe. Also I thought Razbam did SA map? Orbix did Kola.
  22. Dig harder, it's floating around a couple places. Be sure to use WEB search not the now default <profanity>ty AI "search" that the big search pages default to now.
  23. Yea gotta let Jester finish the job it's doing before you plow more work on.
×
×
  • Create New...