speed-of-heat

You are making a huge assumption that ED knows exactly when it will be ready… that’s not me having a dig at ED, but sometimes complex things aren’t as straightforward as let’s dump 50000 man hours and we will be finished. ED are in a hugely difficult position on communication on this sort of thing, too much information and they will be accused of over hyping and under delivering, get it wrong and you actually upset more people , especially when something goes wrong and you have to move the ship date right… In honesty I would say nothing until I was ready to release the product.

A four way hat + depress on my virpil cm3 throttle

actual data now available:

yeah , I mostly "hoping" for an improvement in AI busy scenarios and airfields/strike areas as that where i tend to see CPU encroachment also has i made the move to a 12700k but on DDR4 and my older m.2 drive i should get several "improvements" from that as well ... we will see... I am almost never GPU limited at the moment, but we shall see if not at least I will be on a hardware platform that wont need replacing every couple of years

so... I will hopefully today or tomorrow upgrade to a 9800X3d depending on my cooler arrival. so i will let you know if i still CPU bottle neck... my own feeling on the 5090 is we just don't have enough data to make any informed choice yet, but for me its certainly not an "auto buy" I would like to get real world rasterization numbers before i even consider it ... my normal habit is to upgrade over 4 years for my CPU and GPU and offset that so CPU then GPU ( 2 years apart) I'm in my CPU cycle now... si I am not "due" for at least another 2 years. If DCS picks up the technologies provided in the RTX5x series of cards that might change, but, that doesn't seem like an immediately likely outcome ... and even less so for a VR player

ahhh .. no alas not but i now have it in my one note! so it will get done!

thanks ; and sorry if i asked the same thing twice... my memory is not what it used to be

How do you do that? Create different tx entries for different jets?

So I have now done four big ish missions no comms lock outs any of them, I would have expected it at least once…

Ah I now see what the problem was, me, shockingly, I was expecting a radio call to say go speak to tusk 1-1 , I should have just called it directly

seems to have done! I'm always slightly cautious because proving something not happening is "hard"

If it’s like there others , the buttons and axis are just regular joystick buttons

I think the issue is that -2 -3 and -4 miss their targets so you never successfully complete the mission for the event to fire

yep, it wasn't there

@PeneCruzany way to include this as default ?

I really hope this works this has been bugging me for ages thanks to @MAXsenna for pointing me in the right direction!!!!

Excellent, lets see...

Whilst i completed the mission "successfully" I never received a call from Tusk regarding the CAS mission ?

You get a notification to tell you it is being Jammed

Military Aircraft Mod 1.7.1a (MAM)

It's definitely asking for USN-Deckcrew , but it doesn't seem to be that one ? Sorry yes it is that and the next mission wants Military Aircraft Mod

that's a separate issue... by the by I use Voice Attack and VAICOM and give direct orders to dash 4 all the time .. which he even obeys

I think that is true only in a multiplayer environment... I don't play multiplayer for the majority of my game play.

So i am looking forward to see how this pans out, I'm less worried about the "well we think it does this based on open source material" over "page x of the NATOPS says 'Y' so we do 'Y'" argument in honesty. Why because I played "sims" way before people made this claim to begin with and they were fun... I had tremendous fun with EF-2000 and F-19 Stealth Fighter back in the day so I imagine i will be able to enjoy this module as well in a similar vein... now of course i was not in a world where PVP was a thing (well we did Falcon 3)... but that may well be a concern for that particular aspect of the game. What does puzzle me though is if this opens up avenues for other aspects of "informed opinion" being used to generate aspects of game play, rather than requiring a hard documented and unclassified evidence for other modules, so does it allow "EW" or "consumable" or missile performance characteristics or even other complete aircraft, to be derived from that opinion and if so what is the gate ... is it "i saw it at a trade show" or is it "i saw it at a trade show and we have this other corroborating source(s)" ... or is it "Frank says so" ...

Correct at present