speed-of-heat

ahhh .. no alas not but i now have it in my one note! so it will get done!

thanks ; and sorry if i asked the same thing twice... my memory is not what it used to be

How do you do that? Create different tx entries for different jets?

So I have now done four big ish missions no comms lock outs any of them, I would have expected it at least once…

Ah I now see what the problem was, me, shockingly, I was expecting a radio call to say go speak to tusk 1-1 , I should have just called it directly

seems to have done! I'm always slightly cautious because proving something not happening is "hard"

If it’s like there others , the buttons and axis are just regular joystick buttons

I think the issue is that -2 -3 and -4 miss their targets so you never successfully complete the mission for the event to fire

yep, it wasn't there

@PeneCruzany way to include this as default ?

I really hope this works this has been bugging me for ages thanks to @MAXsenna for pointing me in the right direction!!!!

Excellent, lets see...

Whilst i completed the mission "successfully" I never received a call from Tusk regarding the CAS mission ?

You get a notification to tell you it is being Jammed

Military Aircraft Mod 1.7.1a (MAM)

It's definitely asking for USN-Deckcrew , but it doesn't seem to be that one ? Sorry yes it is that and the next mission wants Military Aircraft Mod

that's a separate issue... by the by I use Voice Attack and VAICOM and give direct orders to dash 4 all the time .. which he even obeys

I think that is true only in a multiplayer environment... I don't play multiplayer for the majority of my game play.

So i am looking forward to see how this pans out, I'm less worried about the "well we think it does this based on open source material" over "page x of the NATOPS says 'Y' so we do 'Y'" argument in honesty. Why because I played "sims" way before people made this claim to begin with and they were fun... I had tremendous fun with EF-2000 and F-19 Stealth Fighter back in the day so I imagine i will be able to enjoy this module as well in a similar vein... now of course i was not in a world where PVP was a thing (well we did Falcon 3)... but that may well be a concern for that particular aspect of the game. What does puzzle me though is if this opens up avenues for other aspects of "informed opinion" being used to generate aspects of game play, rather than requiring a hard documented and unclassified evidence for other modules, so does it allow "EW" or "consumable" or missile performance characteristics or even other complete aircraft, to be derived from that opinion and if so what is the gate ... is it "i saw it at a trade show" or is it "i saw it at a trade show and we have this other corroborating source(s)" ... or is it "Frank says so" ...

Correct at present

Ffs… Why exactly are you here, you don’t want the feature just turn it off, for others it’s useful And of course it can’t it’s not meant to do everything it’s meant to allow visibility Your problem is with … physics…

A dot is a pixel… or a combination of pixels, the can literally be any colour that can be produced on a monitor or headset… but let at least start with something that improves the situation.

actually it just needs one change ...luminosity to reflect that (pun intended) functionally changing the colour of the dot based upon the albedo between the observer and the target so if its shiny and over dark make the dot white...

ah ok, that's very ... odd... i must admit when @MAXsenna said CZ the only thing i could think off was CZ on the targeting pod... and assumed it was something else ... thanks for the clarification

@MAXsenna ... what is cursor zero ?