Jump to content

EvilBert VR

Members
  • Posts

    227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by EvilBert VR

  1. @Pikey I have a copy of the so called: "Militarisierungsatlas BRD" (Militarisation Atlas of the FRG) where ALL military installations of the cold war area in Western Germany are listed. And ALL are ALL in this case: Airfields/ Heliports/ Autobahn-Landing Sites/ ADA installations/ Barracks/ Depots/ Hospitals/ Fuel Installations/ (Border-)Camps/ Bunkers, etc. The listing includes installations of German based Allies (US, CDN, UK, FR, NL, BE). I assume this is exactly what you are lookind for. Drop me a line for further information. Cheers! ...Oh, and of course their exact locations...
  2. Ok, Thx. So no need to preset J or K or anything like this?
  3. Thought I had to pick a profile somewhere as well?
  4. So far, what I've done: Latest Nvidia driver (572.16) Latest Inspector (2.4.0.11) Picked "DCS.exe" in Inspector NOW: What to click/ activate in Inspector (I assume) before starting DCS? Cheers
  5. Ok, that makes me confused again. 1st method does not demand to manually install DLL files into the folders 2nd method (Esac_mirmidon) requires to download and install "NEW" DLL files manually into the .bin folders of DCS. Is there a difference? And btw: What are the settings I need to activate in Inspector in order to get those things running? Geeez... I feel like a complete NOOB atm.
  6. THX! I will give it a shot. Never thought it was that simple tbh. Will report back! Thx for that! But on GitHub it wants me to download the DLL files and install them seperatly. So I guess I will skip this method. Btw, the GH thread is more than 20 days. Cheers!
  7. Ok, same here..... Got lost and confused throughout further reading So how is the latest instruction? What I got so far: NVidia Inspector (I assume latest version) Latest DLL files? where to download and how can I recognize the latest version? And where to put them? No DLLswapper required (with the new Inspector) Geeezzzz: That is getting more confusing every time. Anyone here with a simple instruction for dummies like me? Cheers!
  8. Architect, I'd appreciate it you were focusing more on topic and on what I stated than presuming what I do for a living or being cynical about cars driven etc. (Can't find the occasion in my post giving you a reason to do so.) Like @Phantom711 assumed, it might has been a funny approach. Frankly, your post is giving your opinion that I respect. But as I quoted I do not agree with your title stating "NO". I deeply respect your technical approach and I am glad having guys like you around that give scientific views but you just disregard the personal needs and views of random users along their subjective points of view being in (systemwise) situations like mine. As I said: Your chosen title of the thread (along with your post) claims that your assumptions are a fact. And that is what am not consent with. Cheers
  9. Hello Architect, I really do think your post is confusing a little bit misleading and partially off from general thinking, addressing "only" current 4090 users. It might be true for people considering about upgrading from a 4090 to the 50x cards but (like in my case when looking at my signature) it is going to be a HUGE gain of performance! Even if it was "...only by 21%..." compared to the 4090. The same words were spoken back then when the 4090 was about to be released. But it turned out the 4090 was the thing to go for. Back then I decided to skip the 4090 and wait for the next gen so the 5090 is the thing to go. So: Is it "worth" it? Moneywise? Performancewise? That is up to every single individual. Is it worth it for DCS? No doubt about it! I was lucky to get a 5090 and I am looking so forward to its arrival within the next few days. Also with the MeganeX and the Somnium Ultimate inbound by March I am so excited about what I might experience compared to my current card. My XTal has pushed my card beyond its capabilities and I am very confident that is soon being changed by utilizing the 5090. So saying "No" to the 5090 is a "No"! Cheers!
  10. GOT IT NOW!!!! Thanks! I guess there were some leftovers from the vrgSDK (from my X-Tall headset). I did a restart and ticked the pimax runtime. Now it works! THANKS guys for standing with me and my frustration ;-) Cheers!
  11. Hey Rudel, thanks for that quick response. I did download and install but still crashes: dcs.log dcs.log-20250109-213354.zip
  12. As the title says, No more gain. Tried long repair, still nothing. Any clues? Log files attached Cheers! dcs.log dcs.log-20250109-205000.zip
  13. Still facing serious problems here! With no changes made in the settings it is still worse than a slide show so I decided to roll back. I am having 99-100% GPU useage and literally no CPU useage. Keeps crashing and is totally unable to play, unfortunately. I hoped to finde some solutions over but as it seems there are multiple different issues to solve. Cheers
  14. Another heads up on this! I can TRUELY recommend thid itty bitty piece of software and ESPECIALLY that ECXELLENT and OUTSTANDING service provided whenever a problem should occur. So far the issues I had were all self-generated and not at all affiliated with SimHaptic. Those 30 bucks are invested very, very well! Cheers
  15. Done. BTW: I have disabled all inofficial mods, not a change. I will run for a repair and come back. Cheers
  16. HUGE problems, apparently VR only. Since the last patch my DCS refuses to work. The launcher starts, ok. But upon entering the old menu I observe a HUGE drop of FPS. Starting ANY mission in ANY aircraft causes DCS to crash. Befor the update it worked buttersmooth in high settings so I did not expect any major changes at least not in that scale! Nothing else had been on my rig, the update onmly. I have observed like 99% usage of my GPU whilst only 12% usage of my CPU. @BIGNEWY Any ideas? Cheers
  17. DCS keeps crashing upon entering ANY aircraft. Besides that it turned everything into a freakin slideshow!!!! Need to roll back!
  18. Heads up @ all! Awesome support from rkApps!!! I gave them a shout and I was helped immediately! It turned out that a relic in my export.lua from another deleted app (Volanta) screwed up some other exports. Now THAT is what I call successful support! SH works like a charm now. Cheers
  19. I certainly know this. But as I described, it refuses to connect with DCS. Thanks for the info regarding getting in touch with them via the homepage. I'll give it a shot. Cheers
  20. What am I doing wrong? I have installed both (SimHaptic and DCSRealistic) but I am not able to get it connected with my DCS. I have to start the app manually and in any case it just tells me: "waiting". I had to copy the .lua manually into the savedgames/... scripts folde but still nothing happens. It is getting connected to the buttkicker since "test" works flawlessly. Any advice? No response from rk so far. Cheers
  21. Nobody stated that graphics didn't matter! And being one of the old salts that has been using Simulators (or even games) since C64 times I surely am happy of how graphics have evolved since those days. But propably you do not understand the complexity of how it works within DCS or other any software. ED and all third party devs HAVE to find a ballance (programmmingwise) based on available and comonly spread hardware outfits, the systems integratenion and graphic among other things. If you don't care about systems and just want eyecandy in the highest most likely photorealistic resolution, well then you should go and look for something else but DCS. If you're looking for the best way to cumulate the points mentioned above, DCS (with its modules) is the place to be! Unfortunately you did not respond to my questions asked. If you feel offended by the (as you said) "low poly graphics" of the module, ok. Yikes: I forgot it's not the graphics! It's the circumstance that they dared to release it that way...... C'mon bro! Seriously? But please tell me: What is that you like the most about the Kiowa? And please share your thoughts about the comparison pictures I put up with us!
  22. Thor, as much as I understand YOUR personal subjective impresion, as less do I understand your missing objective assessment in regards of the external overall appearance. Just for my understanding: Are you using the helicopter to seriously take part in missions or campaigns on MP servers (or even as a SP?) to make use of all the implemented systems that THIS Kiowa festures that gives so much benefits on the battlefield? Have you even tried them out yet especially in multicrew (which I doubt but correct me if I state wrong)? Or are you more like a gameplayer just flying around in externeal view without bothering the features or systems in this bird? Sorry for beeing sarcastic here but it is called: Digital Combat SIMULATOR and not Digital Eyecandy Presenter. Don't get me wrong. As I stated above I do respect your own personal subjective impression but I'm getting the thought you want to convince the rest of this great community that your truth is the one and only. Of course: Everybody is lurking for a great exterior and fine modelled interiour. And IMO PC did a fantastic job on this not beeing behind other modules, especially in comparison to the AH-64D or the awesome F-4! It is all about of what one want or of what one doesn't want to see. But hey: I am fortunate that you can explain your points to me and the rest of the comunity based on your facts and on your knowledge of detailing pixels in accordance of those screnshots taken of the modules you took for comparison (Kiowa F-4 and AH-64) Cheers
  23. Moin zusammen! Ich hoffe, der Stream hat dem ein oder anderen gefallen. Viele Fragen konnten ja beantwortet werden Auch die PN's hier habe ich nun durch. Hat jedenfalls Spaß gemacht und auch an dieser Stelle noch mal ein fettes Danke für die Anmerkungen und Comments im Stream! Freut euch schon mal :-D Cheers!
  24. Just for your info guys: Language is pretty likely to be German, but anyhow!
×
×
  • Create New...