Minsky

A user on Razbam's Discord asked to see how the map looks with the terrain textures set to Low. So I went and made a few comparison screens. Posting it here in case someone else might find it useful. Left = HIGH, Right = LOW:

Вы путаете хотелки и свистелки с корректной симуляцией достаточно важного прибора. Не вижу как эта симуляция осыпет основную модель. А если и осыпет - дело будет не в приборе, а в кривой реализации основной модели.

Похоже я вас неправильно понял - решил что речь не о индикации факта ухода в минус, а о показе точных отрицательных значений В таком случае да - то, что апачевская стрелка замирает сторого на нуле, выглядит подозрительно. Не зная точную модель высотомера в Д, сложно что-то предъявить разработчикам, но более старые модели AAU-31/A и -32/A, которые ставили в А, насколкько я понял из документации, уходили на -950.

Я думаю он так и работает: стрелка механически связана с барабаном, и когда он доходит до пороговых значений (от нуля до скольки-то там футов), то блокирует ее дальнейшее вращение. Вот тут это хорошо заметно: Высотомеры, подобные апачевскому, вообще не рассчитаны на показ отрицательных значений - ни маркировкой барабана, ни градуировкой шкалы. Если применить к ним вашу логику, то какое значение показывает прибор на фото ниже - +415, -415 или -585* футов? *Стелка же типа продолжила движение против часовой, и после нуля пошла на -900, -800, -700 и так далее.

What do you mean? Historical declinations on both The Channel and Normandy 2.0 maps are not entirely correct (off by about one degree), but they're not "backwards".

Yeah, it needs to be flattened.

@Kanelbolle @cfrag this is awesome guys No way I could've figured this out myself. I modified your scripts to simultaneously write to the DCS log, in-game messages, and their custom log files. Works like a charm. Thank you both very much!

Thanks, I'm aware of these pages, but neither explains how to actually see the data I need. The first draws some gray boxes, and the second saves the stuff into table I don't know how to print.

Hi, I don't remember the exact name (T.A.R.G.E.T. ?), but have you installed any Thrustmaster software for the controllers? If yes, make sure it's up to date. If it's up to date, then maybe uninstall it completely and see if the problem persists? I have the same joystick and throttles (and also the pedals) and I have never experienced any performance issues from them on multiple PCs. I'm using the stock Windows 10 drivers.

Hey guys, Can someone please help me with a simple script? I need to get the list of all runways (their names, to be specific) at all airbases on any given map and dump it into the DCS log. Formatting doesn't matter, it just have to be human readable, something akin to this: Kerman 16 34 Khasab 1 19 I know it seems super trivial, and I've tried reading a couple LUA tutorials before posting this, but my brain simply isn't wired for programming

$50 for twelve airfields when you already have 70? This will be a hard sell to the users, and even harder sell to the mission designers.

Худший пост на форумах ДКС. Аргументировать не буду ибо он даже этого не заслуживает... Зря потраченные пять секунд на прочтение.

They could've given Biggin Hill to Ugra tbh. The way it sits on the edge of the map, with the barren terrain and blurry textures visible each time I takeoff in that direction, looks kinda terrible.

Я правильно понимаю, что с сегодняшним выходом 2.8.4 в стейбл Нормандию-2 в том или ином виде получили абсолютно все, и старая Нормандия-1944 осталась только у тех, кто пока не обновлял ДКС?

It turns out we've been looking in a wrong place: The "Cullen" they have modelled is actually another airfield located near Estancia Sara (the yellow arrow), whereas the real Cullen should be where the green arrow is pointing: This (and the wrong marker position) has been reported in Discord.

Nope, that was just a preview. I edited the post to avoid further confusion.

It's not just "some inaccuracies", man, it's sloppiness and plain laziness. More than a few airfields that were supposed to be historically correct in the Normandy 1944 map now have a completely different layouts in the Normandy 2.0. And more than a few have been simply cloned: Ugra literally took one airfield, rotated it and pasted under a new name, with all the little details such as bikes and crates at the exact same places. These might be hard to spot when you have seventy aerodromes, but I do and it bothers me.

Hey guys, The Normandy 2.0 release kinda came at a bad time, as I'm currently in the process of overhauling this package. Don't want to release the update half-baked, so I'll just drop the new Normandy pages here for anyone who needs them now:

Ugra should promptly announce the NTTR 2.0 as an excuse for not fixing this for another year.

The map "takes place" in 1944, before the airport was opened. They've mentioned somewhere in the FAQ that it is still under construction.

DCS 2.9.3.51704 - 22.02.2024 Deanland - wrong numbers (22-34) Abbeville Drucat - numbers (11-29) don't match headings (126-306) Kenley - wrong numbers (2-30) Tangmere - numbers (3-21) don't match headings (152-332) West Malling - numbers (15-33) don't match headings (064-244) Creil - numbers (15-33) don't match headings (061-241) Evreux - wrong numbers (35-21) Goulet - wrong numbers (35-21) Hauterive - numbers not reciprocal (32-15) Saint-Aubin - numbers not reciprocal (31-12) Triqueville - numbers not reciprocal (34-15) Lympne - numbers (7-25) don't match headings (110-290) Merville Calonne - numbers (18-36) don't match headings (073-253)

Normandy 2.0 DCS 2.9.1.48111 Open Beta - 16.11.2023 1 Saint Pierre du Mont 2 Lignerolles 3 Cretteville 4 Maupertus 5 Brucheville 6 Meautis 7 Cricqueville-en-Bessin 8 Lessay 9 Sainte-Laurent-sur-Mer 10 Biniville 11 Cardonville 12 Deux Jumeaux 13 Chippelle 14 Beuzeville 15 Azeville 16 Picauville 17 Le Molay 18 Longues-sur-Mer 19 Carpiquet 20 Bazenville 21 Sainte-Croix-sur-Mer 22 Beny-sur-Mer 23 Rucqueville 24 Sommervieu 25 Lantheuil 26 Evreux 27 Chailey 28 Needs Oar Point 29 Funtington 30 Tangmere 31 Ford 32 Argentan 33 Goulet 34 Barville 35 Essay 36 Hauterive 37 Lymington 38 Vrigny 39 Odiham 40 Conches 41 West Malling 42 Villacoublay 43 Kenley 44 Beauvais-Tille 45 Cormeilles-en-Vexin 46 Creil 47 Guyancourt 48 Lonrai 49 Dinan-Trelivan 50 Heathrow 51 Fecamp-Benouville 52 Farnborough 53 Friston 54 Deanland 55 Triqueville 56 Poix 57 Orly 58 Stoney Cross 59 Amiens-Glisy 60 Ronai 61 Rouen-Boos 62 Deauville 63 Saint-Aubin 64 Flers 65 Avranches Le Val-Saint-Pere 66 Gravesend 67 Beaumont-le-Roger 68 Broglie 69 Bernay Saint Martin 70 Saint-Andre-de-lEure 71 Biggin Hill 72 Manston 73 Detling 74 Lympne 75 Abbeville Drucat 76 Saint-Omer Wizernes 77 Merville Calonne

Это называется "копипаста". Я бы мог поверить в версию с "типовым планированием в военных условиях", но вряд ли оно регламентировало все вплоть до брошенных великов и расстановки ящиков

Субъективно в самых плотных районах она не тяжелее Гуама. Скорее даже легче.

Она у всех мигает. Закидывайте.