antagonist

I don't know for certain, but if there is no hydraulic pressure, could it be air pressure is forcing them up?

For me, the issues with the 109's gauges are fixable as I could trace them back to the ignition breaker not being pushed in despite airspawning. Guns also won't work until you push in the IFF breaker.

Well, at least you got your 190's engine running. Mine won't even run when doing the instant action air start scenarios.

One of the LNS devs actually tested with an unprotected version of the game and found out it was not subject to the issues you're describing. So yeah, almost certainly the fault of the copy protection.

StarForce being itself has screwed up the latest patch for 2.0.

This is almost certainly not a problem with the module itself, but the latest patch introducing some sort of error in lots of planes due to its copy protection. Links to follow. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3069205#post3069205 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3069070&postcount=51

Don't mind me, I'm thoroughly entertained watching this bickering for no reason on his part.

Apparently, the culprit is StarForce. Who would have thought. That piece of malware deserves all the bad press it gets, and then some.

Yeah, quite a lot of the AI only planes are really showing their age, to put it mildly. Good to hear you're going to have your model made available for the core game's AI vehicles!

Aw yiss! The F-14 has been among my favorite jets of all time as far as I can think back.

3. While by no means an expert, judging by the sights in German planes being offset to the right of the centerline, I would assume they were meant to be used with both eyes open, but only looking through them with one eye, the same way reflex sights on modern rifles are being used today. I agree it is somewhat of a hassle for people whose left eyes are dominant. I know the first couple of rounds during gunnery training I always spend trying to switch my eye dominance around - if I don't, all my rounds will actually pass my chosen targets to the left. 4. I would assume it has something to do with either noise or exhaust entering the cockpit. 6. The MG131 did in fact have access to HEI ammunition. I don't know offhand what the ammunition mix is for it ingame, and I know the ammo choice for the P-51's M2s has been...controversial, but pound for pound, the German 13mm was among the best HMGs of the war and certainly better than the Browning. Note I said pound for pound, not gun for gun. One M2 is certainly superior to one MG131.

Do you have an ETA for 2.0 yet? Also, thank you very much for taking time during the weekend to answer our questions here!

Er, the F-15C is most certainly using a variant of FBW called Control Augmentation System.

MY SIDES!

Damn, that spot on accuracy against flying targets.

He has an X55. There is no analog slider on the throttle.

Yeah, well, I routinely start DCS via the updater. Only the first time around it never prompted me to patch.

I have the same error.

Damn, looks like we're not going to get the SAPI round.

I was not talking about ammo capacity, but the types of ammunition used.

While we are on the topic of guns, what will be the loadout for the MG and cannon belts?

Dayum. Very nice, can't wait to get my hands on it in less than two weeks. :3

While I agree in general, the encryption used would be the most sensitive part of the whole thing...and it is utterly irrelevant for modeling its capabilities in DCS. Since Gripen uses an evolved version of it, odds are they've become so distinct from one another you cannot reliably take the Viggen's and extrapolate from it the limitations and capabilities the Gripen's has.

Botch my takeoff and fireball horribly.

Awesome/10!