Skywall23

We will need a ragdoll system for that...maybe they can be implemented in the next ED simulator...

whats the problem with the new sub-forum? :confused:

Nice work Chizh and thanks. :)

Some benchmarks: http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=1714&page=3 http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=1714&page=4 http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=1714&page=5 __________________________________________________________ As you can see the 6600GT maintains the performance even at high resolutions. I have ordered mine, what are u waiting for to order yours? =D

I second benzene31. The 6600GT is the best medium range card out there, get it! It is MUST have card!

You guys really like to use Anti-Aliasing dont you? AA at 2x is good for me.

What box are u talking about?

And im going to receive my MSI GF6600GT 128MB graphic card! Its been a long time since i didnt change my graphic card. My poor GFTi4200 could barely hold on, but backup its on its way. :D

U have my vote VVanks. :)

Talking about big aircraft...the 27 is a monster. :O But good job Omega, well done.

Do you wanna bet that not? =D

Yup, but in that case, there shouldnt be any release dates at all ,right? I know what is software, and know of its complexity, but I also know that there must be estimates for game releases. Damn, every game has a release or estimate release date why should ED/TFC be different heh? But on the other hand, it says on the website "planned release date" and surely planed means something. ;-)

ROFL - yup you are right. But they could at least changed the website default date...

Viper is right, http://img107.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img107&image=lomac3mx.png

lol that's funny

That is due to the new cooling system. That part of the cockpit was modified.

Course not! Im no newbie! I have a squadron and I play with them online, but man, today online or offline both are almost the same to me.

Im tired of waiting as well... Hell, I'm tired of 1.02....always the same thing. I want something new...pls pls pls, hurry up IF you can.

By the way what happened to the meteor?

Success in AMRAAM Guided Missile Trials (Source: Eurofighter GmbH; dated March 15, web-posted March 17, 2005) HALLBERGMOOS, Germany --- Eurofighter GmbH announced today the success achieved in recent Advanced Medium Range Air-Air Missile (AMRAAM) guided firing trials – a further milestone in proving the maturity of the Weapon System. Typhoon DA4, piloted by BAE Systems Chief Test Pilot Paul Hopkins with Dave Sully in the rear seat, participated in the weapons trials at the QinetiQ Deep Sea Range at Benbecula in the Outer Hebrides, and was supported by an RAF flight refuelling tanker, a Nimrod MR2 to check for surface vessels within the danger area, and by the Royal Navy, who provided the unmanned Mirach targets. The profile for this test required the Typhoon aircraft to track two targets by radar, to simulate an attack on one Mirach using a captive AMRAAM missile while simultaneously attacking the second target with an active missile. The active AMRAAM scored a direct hit on the target and destroyed it. The developing maturity of the aircraft will be further demonstrated through the planned forthcoming guided firings, which include a launch against a jamming supersonic target, a shot using tracking data from a second Typhoon through the MIDS (Multifunctional Information Distribution System) data-link, and a twin firing against two targets. Brian Phillipson, Programme Director Eurofighter GmbH, commented: With more than 30 aircraft in service with our four Nations, and further deliveries now being made weekly, it is important that we steadily release more and more capability to our partner air forces as they build up their fleets and their experience. This complex firing is another successful achievement in our continuing development programme, another example of the progressive capability demonstration and clearance our customers are expecting from us. It is also another demonstration of the tremendous capability of the Eurofighter compared to previous generations of combat aircraft. _____________________________________________________________ Isnt the MIDS supported by the F-15 C version?

Indeed this russian buttons need to be revised...

Lol? :roll:

Tharos provided sources? LMAO. What sources other than his own thought/opinion/conclusion? And minizap, which tharos himself says isn't very accurate? LOL. Did I get it right, IAF is full of shit, according to you and tharos? Is it the "because I say so and because I'm merrikan!!!11!"? LMAO^2. Since neither of you will ever find a credible, military source that says the AMRAAM is superior to the R-77, you may remain quiet. Be advised that most internet pages have innacurate info on them although I dont doubt that the IAF site says that the R-77 is an excellent missile, I never saw the IAF fighting A2A combat with another nation, and I dont think that the 77 was ever used in combat. (I think...) Until then, you should also remain...not quiet, but with some caution in case you are wrong. :wink:

Well about the R-77 being inferior to the Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile I cant say which one is better as it is really dificult to find accurate info about both. And when I say "accurate" I really mean it. :wink: Modeling missiles is not an easy task to take in the game, but I, as russian fighter pilot, must confess that I believe more that the AMRAAM is better than the R-77, than the contrary. Whatever is the real answer to this debate, we will hardly see accurate modeling of missiles in the game. In other words, you wont feel much diference from both. I dont remember the range of the 77 but I assume that it is a medium range missile, which means that it can hit targets up to 30~40Km. The main diference between both ARH missiles that I think should we will notice when the missiles start to be moddeled corrected is the ability of the AMRAAM to burn-through during HoJ usage. The rest is almost the same in pratical terms. Even if the AMRAAM is superior to the 77 in manoubrability terms, I dont believe that the diference is big enough to make the diference. Now, back on topic: the missiles balistics modeling. I tried the 1.1 tweaked demo only a few times. I only tried the Flanker (tested it to see how was the performance of the a/c and get to see the new avionics) and when it comes to missile balistics, things are almost the same. The R-27ER/R countinue to be the most effective missiles for BVR mode in the Flanker, but you can relock them, as said in the 1.1 read me. The R-27ET/T is well known for being inifective against targets that arent using afterburner or that the target distance is too large. I still havent tried the best missile which the Flanker can use in game: the R-73! :D Im worried though about the AMRAAM issues which have been reported here. Lets hope they can remodel the missile to its true balistics, since the F-15 depends quite much on that missile. If the missile behaviour isnt corrected, we will probably see people waiting for a patch...or not.

2x