169th_Cobra

the only reason people are whining about the payment method is because they want to be able to buy it. if that isn't a good thing i dont know what is!!?? :D

i've found if you get the FFSAM bug just let it kill you and hit RCVR and it doesn't happen again. slightly annoying but no biggy.

what does that thing do?

thats an awesome looking pit!.

I've never had a problem running Lock-on and SP2. 8)

no ... i said have a look at the Fuel Gauges (not the Fuel Flow Gauge) ie watch your total fuel tick down in full after burner compared to full mil power. you can physically see the gauges ticking down at about twice the speed!

It does seem odd they would build a Fuel Flow Gauge that cant measure the total fuel flow correctly. Have a look at the Fuel Gauges when you are in 100% mil power and then kick in full afterburner and see the difference! :?

I'd take the F/A-18 over an F-15E (omg what have i started with this) in that it would fit in a lot better with the supposed time frame and also give us carrier ops. I'd definately go for what D-Scythe suggested as well! Cheers to the devs and everyone at ED for making this such a great game.

Thats about when you get it in real life, at least in Australia. I know the US is different as they will give u a landing clearance on a very long finals even when there are aircraft ahead of you to land and others to take-off before you land. The difference is in the US the final responsibility rest with the pilot in command as oppossed to Australia where the tower is responsible for the runway to be clear before they can authorise you to land. As such you can end up with very late landing clearances as the tower waits for a departing aircraft to get airborne before they clear you to land. :)

i would have thought 200mb would be more than enough. and Chizh stated in another post not to hold your breath that it will be coming out this month (Nov) so save some of your christmas bandwidth. :wink:

I want one!! :lol:

I guess the specs Chizh has say they wouldn't be able to track a target down that low. That aside, it is still a game and if people are exploiting that fact and ruining game play then perhaps they could make some changes to stop this. Personally i haven't seen it happen much, if at all, in a multiplayer game. I guess a factor in our games is they tend to take place over the more mountainous areas making terrain following at that altitude a little difficult. :wink:

Lova ya work D-Scythe! I may be able to help you out with some hosting if you were to email your skins to me. PM me if your interested. :)

lol ...awesome. maybe he could submit his models to the devs? :lol:

for what is it worth, my vote was for the F18. i think it would be great to give the West carrier ops and also have a fast jet capable of moving mud, and sead. also being Australian it is a favourite of mine. :wink:

My personal opinion is that lomac has a great balance of enough imersion with out going full-blown realism ala Falcon4 and all its patches. The one thing i truely enjoy about lock-on is its (relative) simplicity. Personally i would only want to see the F15 avionics reach a similar level where the russian avionics will be in 1.1 and then leave it at that. I would rather see other areas of the game improved before the radar gets a whole heap of new modes to try and get my head around. How about the fuel flow indicator? I for the life of me cant figure it out. Full burners it reads 100 units and idle it reads 90 units from memory. Go figure.

this is the first i have heard of it. sig deleted. :wink:

ok thanks for clearing that up. no complaints from me though! :D

It was mentioned in another post that ED are looking at including a dedicated server option in 1.1 Is there any more info available on this and I thought it would also be a good idea to hear some ideas from the sort of features we would like in dedicated server tools. ie auto map rotation etc. IMHO getting dedicated server tools would be the biggest improvement to this game yet .... it would open up so many more possiblities for online play. We will see people hosting servers who would otherwise have not hosted before, the servers will possibly be more powerful with larger connections making for some awesome games! Thanks in advance.

Thanks for the english forums ... and keep up the great work on 1.1! :)

As always Shepski ... thanks for all your updates and effort. Is there any chance of getting dedicated server software for lock-on in the future? Either way this add-on is going to be great! :)