Oceandar

R-73 performance is acceptable IMO. Its effectiveness in my experience also depends on range and target aspect. Closer range need much more flares to spoof it. Pre flare also helps alot. I dont see why R-73 need correction just based on one case because I could also provide a track to show that how inneffective R-73 is. Should I also ask ED to buff it ?

I hope its not too late at night (Russian time)

Dont forget also use bunch of chaffs, I mean like quite alot. Not that it will guarantee a success but worth a try.

Yup, I've seen that also both in SP and MP. Amraam missed just few feet from its target. Some people suspect it was because desync issue but I didnt think it was because it also happens in SP. Probably "normal" thing as WIP until we have proximity fuse implemented?

I'm not sure if its still relevan. Probably the man himself would like to say something about this https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3422742

I agree with the OP. The brightness really hurt my eyes. I think I should fly at night until ED fix the problem.

I disagree, SD-10 used to waaaay less draggy on initial JF-17 released.

I second this

I agree with this 100%.

I've tested it in SP but I must say in no scientific way and I've found SD-10 is on par or maybe juuuust little bit better than AIM-120C. The disadvantage only lies on SD-10 motor smokes which could be seen miles away lol. I've no problem with the new missile FM tbh.

The cost should depend on the complexity I guess. For example, if they want to model Norwegian Viper with Penguin capability it probably could cost us little bit higher price.

Maybe in the future ED would make specific block of F-16 from 15 to 40 with discounted price after having the original block 50, as an addon I dont mind paying another 10 to 15 bucks for it.

I'm on flat screen and experienced the same thing. I've found the solution by accident by turning my OpenTrack off then on again after that the FPS back to normal without having to restart DCS. I only play MP so your case might be different.

I agree with this completely. Thank you TJ for writing it better.

Why bother posting here. Never saw the man himself posted/replied here. Go to his discord. Good luck

Deleted Understand now.

BUT MOST OF ALL, WHY WAS THIS NOT MENTIONED IN THE CHANGELOGS? I agree with this. But I must say that I don't have problem with the tweaking or changing in the name of realism as long as it works.

Would be nice if you could provide any (real) data to Deka. Not just using other module as a benchmark. Maybe like this : https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=273271

Just tried it again after newest patch and it seem the rocket still having hard time chasing the laser spot, not as bad as before but still it missed alot. I really missed the old rockets FM. Quite dissapointed tbh. Is this BRM-1 90 flight model still WIP or regarded as finished? Thanks

Oh yes please.

My FPS (non VR) also got increase like 10-12 more even on busy server it was stable. Thanks alot ED. Great job.

IIRC They'll be looking at it in the future (probably) after Hornet, Viper are all done. So, long way to go and down low on their list. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4288175

I bought the SC but tbh I'm more excited for the patch than SC itself, particularly the desync issue in MP.

Matt's Youtube video is good indication. Just wait for Matt's video. No video highly likely its not ready but there's still time for it till Wednesday.

Its working decently but I noticed it has difficulty to lock on (no solid loud tone after uncage) in head to head scenario but I guess maybe realistic. Once it got locked then it rarely missed even fired on near max range.