Vakarian

Oh yeah, I was really surprised by it Compared to pretty much everything else, that glass was in pristine condition

Eh, just to keep the bump the thread, here are the pics if anyone is interested how our MiGs were configured (at least number 133). While I wouldn't mind having this cockpit in DCS (just for convenience if nothing else, NATO compatible IFF, radios and some navigation addons), I don't expect it in the slightest. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lr220a1sfLWGXjTeEzyu-tJ_9lhB2Yb0?usp=sharing Just bring it to the current standard and name the price. You'll get the money

Most definitely. Given how old it is, I would gladly pay another $49.99 for a v2. I think no-one sane would expect the upgrade to be free, not after 10 years. MiG-29 really stole almost all my limited time I get for DCS so I would very much like to get updated MiG-21, maybe with some more toys. I will admit I have no idea is there are things to be added for it to still remain a MiG-21bis, but if there are I'd like them in. Sat in the Croatian bis few months ago, it was interesting to see bits of non-soviet equipment in it Wasn't surprised with how cramped it is hahahah.

Well, it's releasing in a year, not tomorrow. So give them time, I would assume getting textures done is hell of a lot easier than getting buildings modeled even remotely correct and then correct-ish types in proper places.

Did you mess with the Carrier's inventory? If the carrier doesn't have weapons in stock, you won't be spawned with them.

Wish @OnReTech all the best for developing this map, very hyped for having a local map in DCS . I would have one request though (and it's a long term one). Given how I was one of the people affected by a very long period of no updates for the Sinai map, please, for the love of all you hold dear/important/holy/whatever, once you release don't wait for another year before pushing new updates. Yes, I'm aware that people with slower internet speeds don't like map patches, however that doesn't mean that there should be year long pause on updates. As there's now roughly once a month patch cycle, please try to squeeze in map updates as frequently as you can. That alone will massively increase the perceived value of the purchase and will help in crowd control. I wasn't too happy with long time of no updates, hopefully I had plenty of other modules and maps to keep me busy but it did leave me with slight doubts will I purchase your next map or not. Please, don't make the same "mistake" twice and keep the updates as frequent as possible.

Aren't those presets for old weather? Same as fog

Plain simply, it takes developer's time and has no factual backing that such configuration ever existed. That's what's "wrong" with this. You are free to make a wish, but don't get upset when that wish isn't granted.

You know of the saying, "When in rome..."? If the aircraft was used in freedom units, then learn them and conform. If the aircraft was used in metric, learn them and conform. Seems like everyone likes realism until it comes to bite them, then realism begone, I want my comfort zone. The 29 is one of the aircraft that we have in DCS that has been configured for both, so kudos to ED for trying to please both groups. When I fly, I fly it in metric with russian cockpit even though I can't read for <profanity> (yet) and I'm not used to the metric units when flying (even though I'm from a country that uses metric) because in all my DCS time I've only flown things that have freedom units so I have a frame of reference for that. Still building one for the metric.

You have double bindings. Check the controls.

In the end, it's all personal preference. We all sit at different distances/heights to the screen, screens are of different resolutions and sizes... That why there are settings to fine tune it to your own liking. What's good for me, likely isn't good for a lot of you. Same goes in the other way. If someone has problems, post what's bothering you and ask for advice.

Maybe moderators could tag the threads as "opinion", maaaaaybe it could help. OP shoving his opinion as the fact on multiple subforums certainly isn't helpful and may confuse new people around here.

OH for sure. The more info they get, the better. Hopefully this showcases the issue a lot better than a simple resolution change. @Flappie Can you show this to the devs? It might help them with debugging/triggering the issue

There's already a topic about this as this is general problem within DCS

Even so, absolute zero is 0 Kelvin or -273.15 Celsius. For seeker to be cooled 360 degrees below ambient (I assume Celsius as I assume Russians use that as the unit of measurement) that would mean the ambient temperature is at the minimum 86.85 Celsius, which would assume chilling the sensor to absolute zero which takes an immense amount of energy to accomplish.

Very highly doubt that

Yup, it's well known A-10 bug which was hard to nail down in a track for a while

No need to be snarky, I said nothing about the inscription. However, check the russian part of the forums, there is some info about the switches.

What muffler is saying is that there is no switch under the "cover", the cover is the switch.

Just a few posts under yours

@BIGNEWY Well, you posted the proof that the current implementation is incorrect nullFirst is the pic you posted, notice how the taxiway is inline with the shelter ending. Second pic is the original post, with the drawing overlaid. Basically, the taxiways should be a little more outwards null

Eh, you guys are talking about one thing, I'm talking about another. That's fine, after all it's just my personal opinion, no need for anyone to get upset about it. Just wanted to share my thoughts.

And how does this go against what I said?

Well, then the mission posted on YT wasn't indicative of that as most of the voice lines were useless banter between the instructor and pilot with pilot acknowledging the instruction and the let's be honest useless interaction with the loadmaster. As I mentioned in my first post, if that "chatter" was replaced with instructor explaining why a procedure is like it is or how it actually works IRL, I wouldn't have said a thing and I would have preferred such solution. I'm not new neither here nor in DCS, just voicing my opinion that I don't like what I saw and why I don't like it. With all that said, I will certainly go through the training missions once to get the visual flow and I learn stuff a lot easier when having some visual reference, but I don't think I'll go over such missions multiple times and for anything I didn't understand I'd rather use manual as then I can get to the information a lot quicker.

Don't do public MP as 99.69% of the servers are: Take off (if you're lucky), dump all missiles in under 3 minutes of takeoff. Landing optional. Not interested in that kind of gameplay. And on the servers that offer this kind of gameplay there is often some custom scoring script running in the background. So yeah, I find having a scoreboard in a simulator weird idea to begin with, but everyone has their own fun...