TotenDead

Also, depending on a country, it might lack the R-73. For example, Iraq MiGs had only R-60s as short range missiles

Slightly, eh? You could say that the MiG-23M was slightly more advanced, the MiG-29 was just way better in almost everything when it comes to a2a

Какая площадь у каждого из рулей?

Интересно, спасибо. Такая здоровая ракета и такая малая дальность

Yeah, right

Наши админы на долго пропали?

Хм, а как на счет Р-40?

Реализм уровня посадки су-33 коброй в дкс

Will we be able to remove the data link if needed?

Ирбис поставят. С антенной кассегрена

Требовали платить за использование реальных названий?

Реальный конкурент есть в другой игре. И историчный, и балансный: Ф-16а блок 15 адф с двумя аим-7 и 4 урвв малой дальности. Амраамоносцы - не то пальто

Да, конечно, тоже верно

Или с Fw-190A8 и чинуком Слишком иконистый самолёт для западной аудитории) Имхо, интереснее было бы оценить влияние существования красного модуля на продажи синих. К примеру, сколько было бы продано сейбров не будь в игре МиГ-15. Или сколько было бы куплено мустангов, если бы против них нельзя было бы выставить немецкие самолёты

Помню года три-четыре назад выкладывали продувки аим-120. Были ли с тех пор проведены продувки Р-27 и Р-77?

Было бы интересно получить какие-нибудь комментарии от ЕД. Хотя бы услышать считаются ли скинутые выше источники достаточно авторитетными для внесения правок

I wonder at what distance will one F-35 see another F-35

That sounds illogical. Ecm developers can have access to radars of their aircraft so they'll likely jam those better than some foreign ones

ODS has little similarities to the current conflict. There was one occasion where armor was used as extensively and in large numbers: in the short-lived counter-offensive. And I suppose we both remember how that led to dozens of western IFVs and tanks burning on a small piece of land. Those types of operations are suicidal in the current conflict. Unlike ODS, you can't really surprise-attack anywhere in mass formations, neither side has (or has enough) tech advantage As for the first part, I'm sure that western countries would face similar problems. Don't know the extent and how long will it take them to adapt tho We really digressed from EF tho and should probably end this pretty interesting topic XD

Ukraine had 10 years of western style training, sent troops to nato countries to learn the experience, so... Nato forces never had such a war, not after 'nam. So no, I'd still say that people who have 3 years of real experience would be better than "just drive around the minefield" nato theoretics Compared to v2 (the main US M1 mod, btw) the only important difference is the CITV, the A1 has a simpler one with less features for the commander. But that's it Now, speaking of APS, the one on v3 is already outdated for modern threats. Not bad to have one, just won't save you from major threats like FPVs or mines When it comes to ERA... They slap K1 wherever they can, so no real difference there Airburst rounds? Nice feature, even though not a new one. But those entered full rate production only 2 months ago

Well, actually those are very close to the best of the best of what the US has. There's nothing in sep v2/3 compared to the fighting modification that would change a thing in their performance in this conflict Yeah, well, those guys have more Combat experience than any american soldier so maybe be a little less sceptical about their poor, but still performance. There's noone in this world who would use that tank better at the moment

But Ngad is dead-ish and the US even started to procure obese F-15s...

Since DCS is a game about a war among Nato countries, I'd say something like in-game F-16/18 jammers. Maybe ef-2000

Maybe so, but the question is how would it be affected by jamming

Welp, then shouldn't TWS have problems when tracking targets that are jamming? I'm not saying it should be as affected as n001, but still