TotenDead

The main reason I wrote that is that people want to fly not the proposed jet, but its most powerful version. For example, "I want the F-4 ICE for the cold war!1!11!". Same stuff can be seen with REDFOR planes, e.g "gib us 23MLD, not MLA" or "29SMT, not 29A"

Hm, make a block 1 or something And call it a day if necessary? It would still be the F-35, the mighty fat gen fighter

Because it won't be able to Fight 1980s aircraft as easily as the 3F one?

Не знаю что будет у ботов, но в сетапе 80-х игрокам все равно будут доступны лишь самолеты середины 2000-х за редкими исключениями. Так что какая в целом разница М2 или М3

Кавказ уже удалил, полагаю?

Hmm, but natops doesn't have a single word about peace/war time. It just states 6 Gs (or 6.5), some NATOPS write about some "projected limit", meaning that there were plans to increase the allowed G-load (probably after strengthening the construction, but that's just my guess) "Grumman built the F-14 to be a 9.5G aircraft and tested it to 12 G" 9.5G is weird, tbh. If that was a projected operational limit that would mean that the aircraft was overweight. However, that looks like the correct number for the structural limit if the max operational G-load is 6.5Gs. When it comes to 12G, I believe that it's possible that some individual cases occured where the aircraft (either during ground tests or while being piloted by test pilots) pulled 12Gs in perfect conditions with minimal to no damage. But that doesn't really say that its structural limit is that high. What it might say though is that such aircraft as the F-15 might pull like 18Gs in similar conditions. Add some yaw or bank and the plane will break apart. That's what we don't have in DCS as far as I know Well, since the aoa limit was 28 units (e.g 22 degrees) that looks like something very-very far from what service pilots could do. But anyway, that doesn't contradict what I wrote about perfect conditions pulls Anyway, It would be really great to see any documentation about 9.5Gs you wrote about. So far all I could find stated only 6-7.5Gs

Iirc, the F-14 in the game can pull 12+G turns without breaking apart. Will that be fixed? I mean, it's only a 6.5G aircraft, its structual limit should be around 10Gs tops

Also, depending on a country, it might lack the R-73. For example, Iraq MiGs had only R-60s as short range missiles

Slightly, eh? You could say that the MiG-23M was slightly more advanced, the MiG-29 was just way better in almost everything when it comes to a2a

Какая площадь у каждого из рулей?

Интересно, спасибо. Такая здоровая ракета и такая малая дальность

Yeah, right

Наши админы на долго пропали?

Хм, а как на счет Р-40?

Реализм уровня посадки су-33 коброй в дкс

Will we be able to remove the data link if needed?

Ирбис поставят. С антенной кассегрена

Требовали платить за использование реальных названий?

Реальный конкурент есть в другой игре. И историчный, и балансный: Ф-16а блок 15 адф с двумя аим-7 и 4 урвв малой дальности. Амраамоносцы - не то пальто

Да, конечно, тоже верно

Или с Fw-190A8 и чинуком Слишком иконистый самолёт для западной аудитории) Имхо, интереснее было бы оценить влияние существования красного модуля на продажи синих. К примеру, сколько было бы продано сейбров не будь в игре МиГ-15. Или сколько было бы куплено мустангов, если бы против них нельзя было бы выставить немецкие самолёты

Помню года три-четыре назад выкладывали продувки аим-120. Были ли с тех пор проведены продувки Р-27 и Р-77?

Было бы интересно получить какие-нибудь комментарии от ЕД. Хотя бы услышать считаются ли скинутые выше источники достаточно авторитетными для внесения правок

I wonder at what distance will one F-35 see another F-35

That sounds illogical. Ecm developers can have access to radars of their aircraft so they'll likely jam those better than some foreign ones