Jump to content

Skyhammer

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    88

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Skyhammer

  1. Skyhammer
    what i found on the Internet its definitely described as designed against Air targets "R-27P - with passive radar CNS 9B-1102 (see photo). It is intended to engage DRLO and other radio-emitting airplanes at any time of the day, in simple and difficult weather conditions, in the front hemisphere, including the background of various underlying surfaces, providing defeat of aircraft that put the active interference radar to cover their aircraft. Explosive device - a radio detonator and contact target sensor. Battle unit - rod bearing type. "
  2. Skyhammer
    wow that was a nice favor ...20 years ago..what was done since then? .... to be fair the R-77 in its current state is politely said garbage and can barely fly 50 km if shot from 30k ft, above 1.0 Mach or they need to add PL-12 to Su-33/J-11...that the gameplay is somewhat on one level in terms of Fox3´s because otherwise they would need to limit bluefor to Fox 1
  3. Skyhammer
    I found a strange behavior from the Strela-10. When the SAM "locking" me with there IR seekers it triggers my RWR what not should happing from an IR targeting System. The "radar" from the SA-13 should also not trigger an RWR spike because it is actually only for passiv range finding not to lock a target, Target acquisition only takes place visually. IR Strela 10 triggers RWR Su25.trk IR Strela 10 triggers RWR F15.trk
  4. Skyhammer
    Redfor would be even more outclassed than it already is with more SPAMRAAM variants.....
  5. Skyhammer
    I noticed a bug on the SA-10 Launcher, the missile fins are folding wrong. At ejection phase out of the tube they are full extended and right before the burning phase the fins folding but it should be the other way around. Missile with Folded fins out of tube --> extend fins and burning phase. Also why the S-300PS can´t use the 48N6 missile? Even the DCS encyclopedia mentioned it was/is used by this System. 5V55 find folding wrong when ejected out of the launch tube.trk
  6. Skyhammer
    yeah i have the same issue .. SAMs no radar contacts shown.trk
  7. Skyhammer
    ok, thanks for your time and all the other user...i will close the topic then
  8. Skyhammer
    Flanker with 56% fuel still 7.6 till 7.8 G without ACS or Override control stick limitation...the F-15 on the other hand can still pull 8.8G turns not long but it can Flanker 56% fuel still 7.6 G max.trk F15 with 3 fuel tank 8.8G.trk
  9. Skyhammer
    F-15 was 100% fuel otherwise clean loadout...
  10. Skyhammer
    weight was round about 27.200kg with fuel and only missiles at the wing tips
  11. Skyhammer
    i noticed something very strange on all Flankers the can´t even pull 9 G turns at max something like 7.6- 7.9 G and and it doesn't matter without or with full weapons on the pylons. i only can achieve the 9 G with the ACS or Override control stick limitation button and that brakes the wings instand that seems odd to me that the flanker can´t pull 9G in a high speed turn and the F-15 for example can well exceed the 9Gs without a problem Flanker not even 9 G turn.trk F15 easy 9.5 G till blackout.trk Flanker high G turn.acmi
  12. Skyhammer
    So the S300 detection/tracking range is still very low...at my example it detects a F16 at ~30k ft, Mach 1,7 only at 22km and engages at 18km an that over bone flat terrain..the patriot SAM for comparison detects and engages the F16 at 52 km regardles of skill level....something seems still wrong here with the S300 Performance. S300 detection attack at 18,4km.acmi S300 low tracking distance.trk patriot SAM.trk
  13. Skyhammer
    uhmmm thanks for your time ...but what is with the low detection ranges at only 22km compared to the patriot which detects similar anti radiation missiles at over 100km an engages them?
  14. Skyhammer
    Why? the patriot even outperforming the S-300 ....its first Missile gets of at 102km range compared to the S-300 at 22km Patriot SAM .trk
  15. Skyhammer
    yeah could be possible but its way to weak to only detecting them at 22km because the HARMs are at any time in iterecept parameters for the SAM...but its doing pretty much nothing only in the last few moments ...an is unable to shot 1 down ... I tried that also with SA-15 but they barely can react to intercept the Harms
  16. Skyhammer
    For me there is (sadly) no selling point to buy the FF Mig 29 atm ...when we already have it in FC3 and its will be pretty much the same...only because it's FF ? definitely no
  17. Skyhammer
    I wondered, is the S-300 underperforming/nerfed? It can´t even defend itself against a single F16 with 4 HARMS. F16 is shooting 3 HARMS from 10km altitude, Mach 1,6 at ~117km from the SA-10. The SA-10 TR detecting the HARMS only at about 22km in 9.600m ALT and can´t even shot down 1 HARM. S300 .trk S-300 vs 1 F16.acmi
  18. Skyhammer
    My point is that the entire firing sequence is wrong. The rocket should be ejected upwards from the tube without already burning an fire fire up midair when the missile is horizontal adjudsted via thrust vectoring to the target
  19. Skyhammer
    I know its more a cosmetic kind of thing but the SA-15 missile ejection seems wrong...it should be approximately like the S-300..the missile get ejected out of the tube corrects flight path, fires up and intercept the locked target SA-15 missile pop up.trk S300 missile pop up.trk
  20. Skyhammer
    still not fixed on Su-27
  21. Skyhammer
    up
  22. Skyhammer
    Seems that counts only for AI controlled SAMs.. Heres the difference between a player SAM and an AI SAM ...I operating the SA-15 see the HARM on the Radar in the last 3km(!) of the missle and die. the AI detect it around 13km and shot it down.. AI SA-15.acmi AI controlled SA-15.trk Player SA-15.acmi player controlled SA-15.trk
  23. Skyhammer
    DLSS/DLAA both ON - HUD blur only DLAA -HUD blur MSAA - no problems
  24. Skyhammer
    i my opinion something is wrong with motion blur because every time time the aircraft moves the HUD gets messed up. The first screenshot shows the aircraft lurching left right on the runway. The second one directly behind an engine with high heat blur settings Surprisingly there is no heat blur effect when you are in flight and direct behind the other aircrafts engines in full AB
  25. Skyhammer
    Like the Title says the HUDs of FC3 aircraft are blurry and ivery hard visible when the new DLSS/DLAA is turned on blurry HUD on FC3 aircraft.trk
×
×
  • Create New...