mikoyan Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 We have enough time :) Then add an an-124 and tu-154 and advanced FM for the su-27 !!!!:thumbup: and......
Acgaen Posted May 25, 2006 Author Posted May 25, 2006 Then add an an-124 and tu-154 and advanced FM for the su-27 !!!!:thumbup: and...... The models need to be made. ...then add an an-124 and tu-154... FM - not to me
MBot Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 We have enough time :) Ok, now you have to tell me more :) Oh and by the way, sorry for me not working further on the unfinished Strela-2 missile Acgaen. You guessed it, no time ( and the fact I suck at texturing ;) ). And the next 3 months I will again be away from home most of the week. Of topic: Acgaen, are you interested in a Rapier missile model ? I completed it several months ago. I wanted to create models for the launcher and radar unit but never came to it. Perhaps you can use the Rapier some time so I can send it to you of you want. If not, nevermind.
Acgaen Posted May 25, 2006 Author Posted May 25, 2006 Ok, now you have to tell me more :) Oh and by the way, sorry for me not working further on the unfinished Strela-2 missile Acgaen. You guessed it, no time ( and the fact I suck at texturing ;) ). And the next 3 months I will again be away from home most of the week. Of topic: Acgaen, are you interested in a Rapier missile model ? I completed it several months ago. I wanted to create models for the launcher and radar unit but never came to it. Perhaps you can use the Rapier some time so I can send it to you of you want. If not, nevermind. It would be good thing if send me this model to take a look on the missile.
MBot Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 It would be good thing if send me this model to take a look on the missile. Ok, model is sent. Like I said, it is only the missile itselfe, so without doing the Rapier launcher and radar unit yourselfe the model is quite useless. But perhaps you wanted to make Rapier one day anyway... I hope the quality is ok. I am not sure I could keep up with the quality of your newest weapon models as shown on screenshots. Otherwise just delet it.
Witchking Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 lol...this is a way to get the thread closed...lol! ED...if u have time can you PLEAAAAAAAAAASEEEE PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE add SpeedTree. :cry: :music_whistling: WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro | |A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA|
ALDEGA Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 Got a photo of the pit :thumbup: Rather low-tech airconditioning :D
Acgaen Posted May 26, 2006 Author Posted May 26, 2006 Got a photo of the pit :thumbup: Is already made?;)
Kusch Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 Cockpit pics; http://rc.bestavia.com/YAK-40.html Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)!
monotwix Posted February 11, 2007 Posted February 11, 2007 Hallo every one! Does any one know about the progress of this marvellous YAK-40 project will it be a flyable in Black Shark or is any one working on it’s cockpit model? Ether way please update us. Thanks. :pilotfly: I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
Disso Posted February 11, 2007 Posted February 11, 2007 Wow so this is still going? I remember seeing somewhere that they canceled this model, I simply cannot believe ED are going to implement this civilian model!? It seems so out of the blue! SU-30MKI F/A-18F ...Beauty, grace, lethality.
Ukr_Alex Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 Sh|t looks like I'm late to the party...... This would be awesome. :Core2Duo @ 435FSB x 7 3.05GHz : ATI x1900xtx: 2GB Patriot @ 435Mhz : WD 250Gb UATA: Seagate 320Gb SATA2: X-Fi Platinum:
SuperKungFu Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 yea i think it was canceled, i didn't really see them making a Civilian plane as a flyable. Though, i would like them to add some civilian planes for AI, for example a 747- dress it up as air force one. We could have a mission (if you are an F-15) protect air force one or if you are on the red side, try to destroy it. That would be awesome, i remember a similar mission in Jane's USAF. Would also like to see some other AI aircraft like the An-225 lol, would really like to blow one of those out of the sky. :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Pilotasso Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 sissy civilian aircraft is for MSFS. This is for big men for playing chicken with missiles. :D Yak-40 looses everytime, why bother?! :D .
SuperKungFu Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 lol because we all want to be like harrison ford in air force one and dodge missiles/guns with a big old 747 while migs are on our six :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
TX_Thumper Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 uhhhh.....yeah.... OK, so this is an old post dragged up from May of '06, and I have yet to see a new post from the ED team regarding the topic, but it does beg the question... Why on earth would ED waste so much time developing a civilian aircraft for a "Combat" sim when there are so many other GLARING problems with LOMAC that could be dealt with instead... Dedicated sever mode? Improved damage or flight modelling for current flyables? Additional Western flyables? (hint F-16, FA/18, F-15E or any fast mover that can carry A/G weaponry) Widescreen Support (or at least fix it where it doesnt wipe out my settings every time I go into options panel for anything at all) TrackIR bug.Do you get the point? I read something about spending 7 months on the Yak40 development, but none of the other problems in LockOn have yet to be addressed. I would say that this is unbelievable but from what I have seen with development of this Sim it is actually something more like "Typical". Don't get me wrong, I love flying LockOn, but spending so much time on adding something new that nobody even asked for instead of fixing problems that have been posted about "ad infinitum" seems crazy to me. Let me just say that there are a number of prescription medications on the market for ADHD that can add focus and clarity to ones day to day life. Perhaps some of those meds would be a step in the right direction. TX_Thumper 1
monotwix Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 I think it’s great idea to have a Yak-40 in the game cos it’s not only a good model it could also represent a bit more live in the sim and in the right mission it could be a pleasure thing to fly. It’s a tactical transporter as described in the <cockpit link pics> just above. And in certain ways it could outperform SU-25 cos it flies fast and high with a different objective.:thumbup: I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
monotwix Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 And yes the next addon is going to a helicopter and it looks like it is going to bring some improovements into the sim anyway. I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
AJ.eightFive Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 Not only that, but now I will be able to easily convince my Russian friend to come fly with me in Lock On, since he flies civil a/c only.
TX_Thumper Posted February 12, 2007 Posted February 12, 2007 20% warn??? OK...you cant just reply to the post like a normal person...but choose instead to be punitive...I've seen much bigger rants in these forums with no warning whatsoever. Grow a set and be a man...you have the right to disagree with me in an open discussion...I was only presenting my opinions about adding a civilian flyable to a sim that is full of other issues that could be adressed instead...if you feel insulted, Alfa, thats on you...it wasnt meant to be insulting...grow a thicker skin and stop abusing your forum mod status...
Recommended Posts