volk-19 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 see july and february http://www.fighterops.com/screenshots/Public_SSPlayer/Models_Public2005/Models_Public2005.html :music_whistling: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ukr_Alex Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Well its nothing to die for... I dont like sim hoping and I think I will stick with LOMAC BS. However if Fighter Ops goes for less then 50$ Ill buy it. :Core2Duo @ 435FSB x 7 3.05GHz : ATI x1900xtx: 2GB Patriot @ 435Mhz : WD 250Gb UATA: Seagate 320Gb SATA2: X-Fi Platinum: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest IguanaKing Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I think both will be an essential addition to any flight sim enthusiast's collection. About Black Shark, it looks great and I'll be buying it...but I hope that their team is a little more on-the-ball about what OS it supports than they were in a recent thread. Telling people that x64 is not supported by FC and there are no known plans of doing so...well its a good thing some of us made the plunge and found out that it IS, and works just fine. I'll provide my address later to which ED can mail my paycheck for promoting their product in the 64-bit world . :D Come on guys...its YOUR PRODUCT, you should be more up-to-date on what it can and can't do. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilotasso Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Noticed something: F-15C and E models are the same mesh with the C having the FAST tanks removed. F-16D canopy is far too long could put a 3rd seat in there. [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic] My PC specs below:Case: Corsair 400C PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T) RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4 GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobius1 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Those pics are not the final models, so it's not really fair to judge or compare them. The only final models that there are screenshots for are the J-1 and the T-6 (I'm not sure though), because they will be in the first release. There are pics of the J-1 in the latest set of screenshots released to the public, and some shots of the T-6 in the latest set of screenshots for the Area-51 members and they look great. I still love LOMAC though, and am feverishly waiting, twenty dollar bills in hand, for BS to be released, hopefully before I die or something. Stupid thermals... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theGozr Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Well we should make sure to post plenty of pics of the competition, maybe ED will do something about all our request or bug fixes. Well fighter OPS look like it will be a great sim see fantastic! , I defenitly will get it. Fly it like you stole it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Perhaps you think that ED doesn't look at the competition. You might also think that players don't look at the competition. You're probably quite wrong on both counts ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuky Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Man, some of thos screenshots are just awsome with great lighting and reflection... and those nice ground textures.. hmmm... nice :) makes me think Lock-On is so crappy looking... compared to these ones... No longer active in DCS... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4c Hajduk Veljko Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Man, some of thos screenshots are just awsome with great lighting and reflection...Those are not in game screen shots. Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuky Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 hm... bad luck then :) it was too good to be true :D serously though... untill there are propper lighting effects aplied it won't be a really good realistically looking sim :D No longer active in DCS... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuky Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Actually, if I look at those in game screenshots again (and yeah, not those 3D renderring ones) it doesn't really impress me at all... I would stick with Lock-On graphics over Fighter OPS. But hm... I guess we all just wait and see what final product will be like :D No longer active in DCS... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafer Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Personally, I truely hope ED redo the ground textures in their new sim. I like FO airbase and buildings and the roads. Very clean looking. Awesome! ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Feedback Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 It looks great, I remember drooling over the F-18C model when lomac was still alpha (we all drooled, and if you didn't you either lie, or have bad glasses/contacts, no pun intended, I have -5 on both eyes). I'd gladly buy FO, and, a month ago FO was some kind of fluke, but it looks like it will be quite a sim. Flying trainer aircraft is very, very cool, especially if they have realistic FMs, and lets hope they won't be as jiggly as X-plane planes, and that the mach FCS on the Talon will be operational, otherwise it will be even more of a hell to fly it. I think it combines well, a chopper for your neurotic, stressful situationa, and two nice trainers for your low flying moods. Lol, ED, I could promote your product to women (I'd go up to them in a bar, making some moves on them, and after some kissing, I would do the Black Shark promotional speech. How about that?) Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaman Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 All these are renders not game screenshots. Even when there are "screenshots" that sorta simulate how the game will look like it says "place holder this, placeholder that", it is also pretty much a render. 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 It looks great, I remember drooling over the F-18C model when lomac was still alpha (we all drooled, and if you didn't you either lie, or have bad glasses/contacts, no pun intended, I have -5 on both eyes). I'd gladly buy FO, and, a month ago FO was some kind of fluke, but it looks like it will be quite a sim. Flying trainer aircraft is very, very cool, especially if they have realistic FMs, and lets hope they won't be as jiggly as X-plane planes, and that the mach FCS on the Talon will be operational, otherwise it will be even more of a hell to fly it. I think it combines well, a chopper for your neurotic, stressful situationa, and two nice trainers for your low flying moods. Lol, ED, I could promote your product to women (I'd go up to them in a bar, making some moves on them, and after some kissing, I would do the Black Shark promotional speech. How about that?) LMAO [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Actually, if I look at those in game screenshots again (and yeah, not those 3D renderring ones) it doesn't really impress me at all... I would stick with Lock-On graphics over Fighter OPS. But hm... I guess we all just wait and see what final product will be like :D I think FO will be dx10 so I'd imagine the graphics would be quite good. [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Perhaps you think that ED doesn't look at the competition. You might also think that players don't look at the competition. You're probably quite wrong on both counts ;) Its very obvious the levels of competition between all 3 companies, I'm planning on buying all 3 sims when released: Tank Killers FighterOps Allied Forces 2 Considering there are 3 F-16 sims soon to be made I may as well build a Viper pit.:thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
192nd_Erdem Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Yep. They're just model renders. Even the worst game mods do the same. Bad PR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I like the pictures of the Migs at the Air Base:thumbup: Another good thing is the engine startup from inside the cockpit of the F-16 it sounds better than a V8. [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobra360 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Noticed something: F-15C and E models are the same mesh with the C having the FAST tanks removed. F-16D canopy is far too long could put a 3rd seat in there. Yep, the canopy on the F-15C is wrong aswell, they used the two seat canopy. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badaboom Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Is Tank Killers the sim that ED is doing? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 Judging by the content displayed on both of their websites, JetThunder is much further along than Fighter Ops... Yeah whats JTs level of complexity? Is it going to be as complex as BS/AF or at lockons level? It looks like a good sim. [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostie Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I don't think F-16D's canopy is too long I think its just looks wrong too ovate- if thats a word - too ovaly shaped. "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafer Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 Yeah whats JTs level of complexity? Is it going to be as complex as BS/AF or at lockons level? It looks like a good sim. I seriously doubt anything released in the next two years will be as complex as BS. And by the time more developers hop on the bandwagon and included AFM in their sims, it'll be old news to us and ED would have some other goodies coming down the pipe for you all. :D @ss kissin' mode off Sorry Mower, but the truth hurts sometimes. :D @sshole mode off ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 I seriously doubt anything released in the next two years will be as complex as BS. And by the time more developers hop on the bandwagon and included AFM in their sims, it'll be old news to us and ED would have some other goodies coming down the pipe for you all. :D @ss kissin' mode off Sorry Mower, but the truth hurts sometimes. :D @sshole mode off Well I think FO should be out within 2 years fingers crossed and theres probably AF2 as well and thats a couple of good sims worth waiting for. You never know if AF2 is probably going to be more complex than Falcon AF hopefully they'll add some of the F-16s features missing from F4. [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts