GumidekCZ Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 Hi everyone, I was reading allot of trim post, people arguing, how it is and how it should be, ED team arguing back, that trim is correct how it is and it will be not changed, because of somebody’s different opinion. So I want to try a shot, for how many of Bf109 pilots are happy with it how it is, and how many of you would like to have wider range into "nose heavy direction" of trim wheel. Just this, I DONT want to reopen whole discussion again, because it will either way lead to nowhere. Hopefully this will be not closed or deleted. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razo+r Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 As long as it is realistic i'm happy with it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art-J Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 A bit of a pointless poll, in my opinion. IF the current behaviour is accurate for this variant of 109, then it should stay. What people would prefer becomes irrelevant. i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzles Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 The trim's fine. Just stop filling up the rear tank with MW-50 or fuel. Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sporg Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 A bit of a pointless poll, in my opinion. IF the current behaviour is accurate for this variant of 109, then it should stay. What people would prefer becomes irrelevant. ^^^^ This. Besides, with the proper setting of throttle and manual propeller pitch, the current trim is enough to fly level even with a full rear tank. System specs: Gigabyte Aorus Master, i7 9700K@std, GTX 1080TI OC, 32 GB 3000 MHz RAM, NVMe M.2 SSD, Oculus Quest VR (2x1600x1440) Warthog HOTAS w/150mm extension, Slaw pedals, Gametrix Jetseat, TrackIR for monitor use Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ala13_ManOWar Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Agree, this is a simulator, not an arcade depicting waht people (109 fansboys) want it to be. Besides that, current trim is more than enough for cruising. And last but not least ED is not like other developers bending the knee to fanboys asking for "better gameplay" and I highly respect them for that. Pointless poll. S! "I went into the British Army believing that if you want peace you must prepare for war. I believe now that if you prepare for war, you get war." -- Major-General Frederick B. Maurice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rel4y Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) The only thing is that the elevator trim tabs are neutral. The pitch up moment is pretty much exactly like in Ver. Bericht 109 02 E44 described. I compensated for the 5-6% MAC different CG of the tested G model to the K and used respectively empty MW50 + reduced fuel. It all fits, but trim tabs are set neutral. PS: One has to also mention that for K-4 production the tabs were doubled in size. I think this was done for a reason. K-4 G-6 Edited September 1, 2017 by rel4y Cougar, CH and Saitek PnP hall sensor kits + shift registers: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=220916 Shapeways store for DIY flight simming equipment and repair: https://www.shapeways.com/shops/rel4y-diy-joystick-flight-simming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twistking Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 trim will be perfect, as soon as we get the underwing gunpods;) My personal wishlist after half a decade with DCS: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/184968-my-personal-wishlist-after-half-a-decade-with-dcs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 Hi everyone, I was reading allot of trim post, people arguing, how it is and how it should be, ED team arguing back, that trim is correct how it is and it will be not changed, because of somebody’s different opinion. So I want to try a shot, for how many of Bf109 pilots are happy with it how it is, and how many of you would like to have wider range into "nose heavy direction" of trim wheel. Just this, I DONT want to reopen whole discussion again, because it will either way lead to nowhere. Hopefully this will be not closed or deleted. I am happy with it. Works fine for me on the "Burning Skies" server in MP. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 A bit of a pointless poll, in my opinion. IF the current behaviour is accurate for this variant of 109, then it should stay. What people would prefer becomes irrelevant. +1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GumidekCZ Posted September 4, 2017 Author Share Posted September 4, 2017 Nice, very nice. This poll, I admit, it is quite pointless. Because this poll & discussion will change nothing, except of my feelings. For now I have learned the lesson and will never try to post topic like this or similar. Thanks very much, see you in virtual sky somewhere someday ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anatoli-Kagari9 Posted September 4, 2017 Share Posted September 4, 2017 "E pur si muove".... In this case, the elevator trim tab, not adjustable in this game, like both the rudder and aileron trim tabs can, but used IRL for some good reason ... Flight Simulation is the Virtual Materialization of a Dream... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts