Zadren Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Harrier fuel load is pretty small, and she's a thirsty girl. What is the most fuel efficient altitude/speed to transit to the target area/RTB? Also, are there standard calculations one can do to figure out: 1) How much fuel I need for a particular trip. 2) The best/most efficient flight regime for a particular trip. 3) What I should set as bingo fuel to get home again. I guess all of the above queries apply equally to all the aircraft, but it seems that you really have to pay attention to it in the Harrier - especially since I'm too much of a noob to refuel in flight currently. Cheers :)
rider11 Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Many factors! I am going to do some calcs tonight by flying fully loaded with my Take off weight around 90 and fly 100% power for 15 minutes, 85, 75, and 65 and see what I determine. It will be a low wind, fixed 10K altitude flight. A-10C/C-101/UH-1H/F-15C/L-39/HAWK/Mi-8/A-10A/P-51/AV-8B N/A
Flamin_Squirrel Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 The AV-8B has a cruise MFD page that gives optimum levels and speeds to fly at. This will be very useful when it's implemented. 1
Eldur Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 I think the high altitude fuel flow has to be tuned, similar to the Mirage 2kC when it came out in EA. But you should try watching the FF ppm gauge. It's possible to cruise at quite high speeds with just ~100 ppm, with external stores FF up to 150 ppm should be sufficient. Best altitude depends on loadout, but I'd say it's somewhere between 15kft (heavy load) and 30kft (clean). 100 ppm is 100 lb per minute. Full fuel is approx. 7500 lb, so you can fly for 75 minutes with that fuel flow. Try to imagine there's an afterburner. I've seen values as high as 390 ppm at full throttle. This would drain the whole tank in less than 20 minutes. 1
willzah1313 Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) Whats our ferry range supposed to be with this particular variant? Wiki says 1800nm... 15000lbs of fuel at near 400kts tas at 22-25k 100ppm FF, I was coming up with 2.5 hr endurance and 1000nm, but im sure if I drop tanks as soon as they are empty that would go up quite a bit, but maybe not to 1800nm..... all rough estimations BTW so I could be off Edited December 4, 2017 by willzah1313
Flamin_Squirrel Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 You'll probably need to climb as the fuel burns off too.
Zarma Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Carefull because after refuel, when L and R are bugged on 0, the fuel flow is double as indicated on the fuel flow gauge. i9 9900k, 64 Go RAM, RTX 4090, Warthog HOTAS Throttle & Stick, Virpil AH64 collective, TPR rudder, MFD Cougar, Trackir 5 Pro, Multipurpose UFC, Alain Dufour's TEDAC and Oculus Rift S (when I want some VR), http://www.twitch.tv/zarma4074 / https://www.youtube.com/user/Zarma4074
Knock-Knock Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) Fuel consumption Is the fuel consumption correct currently? I find it goes trough its fuel quite fast, so tonight I was monitoring the 'FF PPM' on the engine indicator panel. Im assuming that is Fuel Flow Pound Per Minute? I was flying with that on 100, and was then keeping an eye on the fuel quantity, which ticked down much faster than 100 Pounds per Minute. More like 300 PPM. Or am I getting all this very wrong? Meh crap. Didnt see this thread, when searching for fuel related questions. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=197153 So please just merge mine with that or delete all together. Edited December 4, 2017 by Knock-Knock - Jack of many DCS modules, master of none. - Personal wishlist: F-15A, F-4S Phantom II, JAS 39A Gripen, SAAB 35 Draken, F-104 Starfighter, Panavia Tornado IDS. | Windows 11 | i5-12400 | 64Gb DDR4 | RTX 3080 | 2x M.2 | 27" 1440p | Rift CV1 | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS | MFG Crosswind pedals |
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted December 4, 2017 ED Team Posted December 4, 2017 merged Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Ramsay Posted December 5, 2017 Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) Whats our ferry range supposed to be with this particular variant? Wiki says 1800nm... 15000lbs of fuel at near 400kts tas at 22-25k 100ppm FF, I was coming up with 2.5 hr endurance and 1000nm, but im sure if I drop tanks as soon as they are empty that would go up quite a bit, but maybe not to 1800nm..... all rough estimations BTW so I could be off The AV-8B SAC Oct 1986, Ferry mission gives: - 4* 300 gallon tanks = 7,915 + 7,915 lb = 15,830 lb - takeoff weight = 30,604 lb - Average Cruising Speed TAS = 398 knot - Cruise Altitude initial/final = 26,050 ft / 40,450 ft - Range 1778 NM (2135 NM if tanks dropped) - Mission Time 4.48 hours (4.98 if tanks dropped) - Landing weight 15,719 lb - Fuel 1,205 lb However it's based off the -406 engine and I think Razbam have given us the more powerful -408 engine. Edited December 5, 2017 by Ramsay i9 9900K @4.8GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 11 Pro x64, Odyssey G93SC 5120X1440
Zadren Posted December 5, 2017 Author Posted December 5, 2017 Thanks all. Now I found the fuel flow meter, it's made it a lot easier. :doh: <100 ppm at 30k ft, at about 400 kts. It really drinks it though when you dive down low to make a run - I guess I'll have to bite the bullet and conquer the tanker.
Eldur Posted December 7, 2017 Posted December 7, 2017 Yesterday I noticed a very high consumption rate. FF was 099 PPM, but it burnt 100 lbs in ~30 seconds. Doesn't always seem to be the case though. Usually after landing and "RRing".
Recommended Posts