Peter_Storm Posted May 23, 2018 Posted May 23, 2018 I'm sorry if this has already been asked, but I have tried to look. Will the F14 be able to carry the AGM-88 HARM?
captain_dalan Posted May 23, 2018 Posted May 23, 2018 I think not. They were never used operationally, so no HARM's....no AMRAAM's as well :) Modules: FC3, Mirage 2000C, Harrier AV-8B NA, F-5, AJS-37 Viggen, F-14B, F-14A, Combined Arms, F/A-18C, F-16C, MiG-19P, F-86, MiG-15, FW-190A, Spitfire Mk IX, UH-1 Huey, Su-25, P-51PD, Caucasus map, Nevada map, Persian Gulf map, Marianas map, Syria Map, Super Carrier, Sinai map, Mosquito, P-51, AH-64 Apache
Freeroamer Posted May 24, 2018 Posted May 24, 2018 They were tested. Never used operationally. http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-agm88.htm
CheckGear Posted May 24, 2018 Posted May 24, 2018 But it will carry a saturn 5 don't worry LOL Knowing the DCS fan base, I wouldn't be surprised if someone actually asked that! :lol:
turkeydriver Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 Carry tested but not launched. The pylon used for the AAQ-14/25 is the pylon developed for HARM integration onto the Tomcat. VF-2 Bounty Hunters https://www.csg-1.com/ DCS F-14 Pilot/RIO Discord: https://discord.gg/6bbthxk
CheckGear Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 Here's the ordnance the F-14A/B carried operationally during the '80s and '90s: - ADM-141A TALD - ADM-141C ITALD - AIM-7F/M/P Sparrow III AAM - AIM-9H/L/M Sidewinder AAM - AIM-54A/C Phoenix AAM - GBU-10E/B & J/B Paveway II LGB - GBU-12D/B Paveway II LGB - GBU-16B/B Paveway II LGB - GBU-24B/B, D/B, & E/B Paveway III LGB/GPS - GBU-31(V)2/B & 4/B JDAM - Mk. 20 Rockeye II CBM - Mk. 82/83/84 LDGP - Mk. 82 Snakeeye Anything else is a no-go, whether it was tested or not.
SkateZilla Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 (edited) Grumman Tested it, on Testbed airframe w/ Prototype Adapters. It never made it to Fleet Testing Sqns, Let alone Fleet. What Users need to realize, There's a Difference between what the Aircraft Can Carry Operationally (AS IN FLEET), vs What Testing Sqn or Demonstration Bird Can Carry in Testing. Testing Squadrons and Demonstration Birds are Often Modified to test these items, and not everything they do to their birds gets integrated into the Fleet. Edited May 25, 2018 by SkateZilla Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
CheckGear Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 Grumman Tested it, on Testbed airframe w/ Prototype Adapters. It never made it to Fleet Testing Sqns, Let alone Fleet. What Users need to realize, There's a Difference between what the Aircraft Can Carry Operationally (AS IN FLEET), vs What Testing Sqn or Demonstration Bird Can Carry in Testing. Testing Squadrons and Demonstration Birds are Often Modified to test these items, and not everything they do to their birds gets integrated into the Fleet. :clap::clap::clap::clap: Couldn't have said it any better myself!
Nanne118 Posted May 26, 2018 Posted May 26, 2018 Here's the ordnance the F-14A/B carried operationally during the '80s and '90s: - ADM-141A TALD - ADM-141C ITALD - AIM-7F/M/P Sparrow III AAM - AIM-9H/L/M Sidewinder AAM - AIM-54A/C Phoenix AAM - GBU-10E/B & J/B Paveway II LGB - GBU-12D/B Paveway II LGB - GBU-16B/B Paveway II LGB - GBU-24B/B, D/B, & E/B Paveway III LGB/GPS - GBU-31(V)2/B & 4/B JDAM - Mk. 20 Rockeye II CBM - Mk. 82/83/84 LDGP - Mk. 82 Snakeeye Anything else is a no-go, whether it was tested or not. Do you know if the Lau-138 Expanded Chaff dispenser rail, the expanded chaff adapter or parachute flares were operationally fielded? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Groundpounder extraordinaire SPECS: i7-4790K, MSI Z97 Gaming 7, 16 GB RAM, MSI GTX 980ti, Thrustmaster WARTHOG HOTAS, Saitek Pro Combat Rudder pedals, TrackIR 5
lemoen Posted May 26, 2018 Posted May 26, 2018 Admin deleted my message for "Debate over realistic or not", but I wasn't debating that at all. The one message that was left is wrong in principle, even though it may well be correct for the Tomcat, that principle was what I was debating. Anyhow.
punk Posted May 26, 2018 Posted May 26, 2018 Do you know if the Lau-138 Expanded Chaff dispenser rail, the expanded chaff adapter or parachute flares were operationally fielded? https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=186256&highlight=Lau-138+Expanded+Chaff+dispenser Punk [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
WOPR Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 The AIM-120 AMRAAM is the follow on to the AIM-54 Phoenix missile. So while the F-14 won't get the AMRAAM, it's still gets a very long range engagement air-to-air missile. There's a nice Wikipedia article on it, and a little bit extra on the 14's targeting capabilities. Wikipedia Link
Recommended Posts