pistolpete01 Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Hey guys, Just a general question: From what I've seen in the early build videos, etc. the tomcat can carry up to 12 MK-82s under the fuselage, but looks like it can only carry 4 phoenix missles or 4 sparrows. I would like to think that if it can carry 12 x 500 LBS GP bombs, it should be able to carry more A2A ordinance with the appropriate racks. Any ideas as to why this is the case? Pistol Pete Rig Specs: i7-8700K - 64 GB RAM - 1080ti - crucial ssd - Oculus Rift - TM T16000
Brainless Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Phoenix is 1000lb and 4m long, MK-82 is 2.22m long. Ryzen 5900X (Water), 64GB DDR4@3600CL16, RTX 3090 (Water), U4021QW, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, 2x1000GB RAID 1, 2000GB, Thrustmaster Warthog + MFG Crosswind, Reverb G2 V2
OnlyforDCS Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Hey guys, Just a general question: From what I've seen in the early build videos, etc. the tomcat can carry up to 12 MK-82s under the fuselage, but looks like it can only carry 4 phoenix missles or 4 sparrows. I would like to think that if it can carry 12 x 500 LBS GP bombs, it should be able to carry more A2A ordinance with the appropriate racks. Any ideas as to why this is the case? What Brainless said. The size and weight of a particular ordanance is another limit that you have to take into consideration. Also the F14 can carry a maximum of 6 Phoenix missiles (not 4) as well as 2 sidewinders at the same time. Current specs: Windows 10 Home 64bit, i5-9600K @ 3.7 Ghz, 32GB DDR4 RAM, 1TB Samsung EVO 860 M.2 SSD, GAINWARD RTX2060 6GB, Oculus Rift S, MS FFB2 Sidewinder + Warthog Throttle Quadrant, Saitek Pro rudder pedals.
Psybain Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Pretty sure it can carry something like 5 or 6 sparrows between it's engines as well if it's not carrying any Phoenix missiles Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Strikeeagle345 Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 Pretty sure it can carry something like 5 or 6 sparrows between it's engines as well if it's not carrying any Phoenix missiles Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk I think there are only slots for 4 in the fuselage. Strike USLANTCOM.com i7-9700K OC 5GHz| MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON | 32GB DDR4 3200 | GTX 3090 | Samsung SSD | HP Reverb G2 | VIRPIL Alpha | VIRPIL Blackhawk | HOTAS Warthog
TLTeo Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 I think there are only slots for 4 in the fuselage. Same as the Phoenix - it can carry up to 4 under the fuselage and 2 on the wing hard points.
ironroad Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 (edited) Launch and landing weight, center of gravity, drag, and air frame stress are the main culprits. Operationally the F-14 normally carried 2 to 4 dumb bombs, 2 GBUs, 2 to 4 JDAMs or a mix of the two (normal two in the "love tunnel"). Also, operationally if they did launch with AIM-54s on a patrol they normally carried two, more if they were certainly some were going to be fired off (i.e. testing and evaluation). Also missiles have a finite storage, flight, and handling life. In a carrier operating environment there is more stress put weapons systems. Even during the height of conflict, F-14s frequently patrolled with Sparrows and Sidewinders, more so than AIM-54s. Pulled from an aircraft scale modeling site... Most research points to fact that "Long-range" intercept (4 or more Aim-54s) was not a common operational configuration. Also, not sure if carrying weapons on the forward pylons during TARPS operations was common either, from my understanding the two forward pallets were normally equipped with ballast or electronics gear. I'm sure there are some here with real world F-14 experience that can chime in. Edited January 25, 2019 by ironroad https://www.youtube.com/user/ironroad18 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ironroad Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 (edited) I stand corrected... Those were "live" MK-82s with anti-static coating... From Wikipedia: VF-84 before the Sluggers picked up the moniker (notice the AJ tail code) Edited January 25, 2019 by ironroad https://www.youtube.com/user/ironroad18 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Nealius Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 The interdiction and OIF payloads are interesting considering the AIM-54 being loaded despite there not being much of an A2A threat in country at the time. Was it loaded purely to balance out the weight of the TGP on the opposite side?
shagrat Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 The interdiction and OIF payloads are interesting considering the AIM-54 being loaded despite there not being much of an A2A threat in country at the time. Was it loaded purely to balance out the weight of the TGP on the opposite side?No. They had some limited Air threat in the opening days, thus the AIM-54 and mix. After the first days of Shock & Awe they went mostly for the 2x LGB setup for the A and B Tomcats. JDAM upgrade for the B came later, IIRC. They did not put more LGB most of the time, cause if they didn't drop they needed to jettison some to get to landing weight. With 2xGBU12 they could still safely land on the carrier though. Shagrat - Flying Sims since 1984 - Win 10 | i5 10600K@4.1GHz | 64GB | GeForce RTX 3090 - Asus VG34VQL1B | TrackIR5 | Simshaker & Jetseat | VPForce Rhino Base & VIRPIL T50 CM2 Stick on 200mm curved extension | VIRPIL T50 CM2 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Plus/Apache64 Grip | MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals | WW Top Gun MIP | a hand made AHCP | 2x Elgato StreamDeck (Buttons galore)
Sealpup Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 No. They had some limited Air threat in the opening days, thus the AIM-54 and mix. After the first days of Shock & Awe they went mostly for the 2x LGB setup for the A and B Tomcats. JDAM upgrade for the B came later, IIRC. They did not put more LGB most of the time, cause if they didn't drop they needed to jettison some to get to landing weight. With 2xGBU12 they could still safely land on the carrier though. I thought weight had something to do with it as well, though. I remember hearing (possibly anecdotal) claims of carrying inert training Phoenixes opposite the TGP as well just to balance out the load.
shagrat Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 I thought weight had something to do with it as well, though. I remember hearing (possibly anecdotal) claims of carrying inert training Phoenixes opposite the TGP as well just to balance out the load.From what I read so far they carried a live Phoenix in the first days of Shock & Awe and switched to mostly 2-3 LGBs depending on pre-planned targets. I can't say for the preliminary trainings, but I am sure nobody would carry around a 2,000 lbs dead weight in a combat environment, if he could go without (LGB on the forward tunnel stations). Shagrat - Flying Sims since 1984 - Win 10 | i5 10600K@4.1GHz | 64GB | GeForce RTX 3090 - Asus VG34VQL1B | TrackIR5 | Simshaker & Jetseat | VPForce Rhino Base & VIRPIL T50 CM2 Stick on 200mm curved extension | VIRPIL T50 CM2 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Plus/Apache64 Grip | MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals | WW Top Gun MIP | a hand made AHCP | 2x Elgato StreamDeck (Buttons galore)
Recommended Posts