[MERGED -OLD BUGS] Forum Cleanup

[finger]

"BREAK OFF"red light does not work(still OFF) under 600m (critical range of target) in "OPTICAL"mode.bug."RADAR"mode is ok.

[YoYo]

First of all, this is a bug reporting thread about the Mig-19P.

Secondly, the Op is suggesting, and not reporting a bug.

 

Keep suggestions OUT of the bug reporting please.

 

Hank,

but is it possible to do blank the first number if it will be zero or not?

This is the question :).

 

Its a suggestion but ... its a kind of bug. I never seen for example USRR's MiG-19 with zero on the front :).

[Urbi]

It would be so easy, at least for a specialist in textures. Divide the Args for the numbers into the left and right sides.

The entries already exist in the description.lua. New they could be as follows:

 

{"MIG19P_T2_R_FUSE1", DECAL, "MIG19_XXX_Decal", false};

{"MIG19P_T2_R_FUSE10", DECAL, "MIG19_XXX_Decal", false};

{"MIG19P_T2_R_FUSE100", DECAL, "MIG19_XXX_Decal", false};

 

{"MIG19P_T2_L_FUSE1", DECAL, "MIG19_XXX_Decal", false};

{"MIG19P_T2_L_FUSE10", DECAL, "MIG19_XXX_Decal", false};

{"MIG19P_T2_L_FUSE100", DECAL, "MIG19_XXX_Decal", false};

 

to be able to represent only two numbers, would have to

 

{"MIG19P_T2_R_FUSE1", DECAL, "empty", true}; and

{"MIG19P_T2_L_FUSE100", DECAL, "empty", true}; for further ahead on the hull or

 

{"MIG19P_T2_R_FUSE100", DECAL, "empty", true}; and

{"MIG19P_T2_L_FUSE1", DECAL, "empty", true}; to stand further back on the hull.

[some1]

The real ARK-5 instructions from MiG-19S/P manual don't mention anything about switching to ANT to tune the radio.

 

In fact they say that ground tuning check should be done in COMP mode which is currently impossible because tuning controls move only in ANT.

 

[some1]

In the middle of the frequency window there should be a vertical line, so the pilot will know which frequency is currently set, by aligning the scale with the line.

 

The line is mentioned in the real ARK-5 manual and also correctly put in the DCS MiG-15.

 

[YoYo]

Its true:

 

 

http://forum.oldradio.org.ua/index.php?topic=11472.0

http://ussr-cccp.moy.su/publ/aviacija_sssr/oborudovanie_samoljotov_sssr/ark_5_avtomaticheskij_radiokompas_sssr/218-1-0-605

[OverStratos]

Most labels/text in the cockpit are phosphor based, that´s why it´s illuminated in the dark.

 

 

There´s no backlights in this aircraft, with the exception of maybe the ARK-5 gauge and the AR-18-19 panel. This will be implemented once the battery switch is turned ON.

[OverStratos]

The RP-5 locks the target at 4.000 meters, not 2.000. Also, the "bird" span changes with distance as well. We will se if we enable de ring diameter change in the next update, it was something that was not clear in the documentation.

[Hovis]

As title says I don't own the module but in the mission editor it marks the module as flyable

 

The game allows me to load the map as pilot and even select the slot but crashes to desktop soon after.

 

I'd have though it was an ED bug but no other module has this? Maybe it's your side?

[finger]

The RP-5 locks the target at 4.000 meters, not 2.000. Also, the "bird" span changes with distance as well. We will se if we enable de ring diameter change in the next update, it was something that was not clear in the documentation.

 

Hi OverStratos,of course you are right it is my incorrect statment.So once again:

 

1)The RP-5 has LOCK ON TARGET at 4000m and GREEN light above RP-5 screen is ON.ASP-5 is still waiting for range 2000m.When it gets it GREEN light on ASP-5 head is ON.

 

2)The needle of range indicator is starting to move from 2000m to 0m and the diameter of piper is changing in is working area range.Working area of piper is relationship between wingspan(7-70m) and range(0-2000m).

 

3)If I have exactly set wingspan,target will be still precisely framed.

[MrBukkake]

Experienced same bug. I did try to load the Mig 19p as player controlled aircraft and DCS crashed . so probaly a bug on their side

[HAE5904]

Thanks Urbi, I'll pass them on to the one who made them.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[HAE5904]

Hank,

 

but is it possible to do blank the first number if it will be zero or not?

 

This is the question :).

 

 

 

Its a suggestion but ... its a kind of bug. I never seen for example USRR's MiG-19 with zero on the front :).

If you take in account that the modeler didn't took a Russian Farmer as an example, but one from a different country where they used a 3 digit number..... Than it's not a bug at all.

 

Maybe the modeler will change the dynamic numbering system.

See my answer to the post made by Urbi.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[Basco1]

After today's update the red star's on the Russian skins still have incorrect white borders.

 

The ARK-5 antenna still appears unpainted,and it's lines or cords showing in the canopy glass externally,still haven't been fixed to show from an internal view.

 

I was under the impression these were all fixed and were going to be added to today's update,they were even moved to the completed bugs section.Why inform us these bugs are completed,when we can all see they're not ?

 

.......And these were some of the straight forward/simple visible bugs reported,don't want to feel ungrateful but......

 

 

Oh well,next update then ?

[KAKTYC_11]

Something wrong with lighting again! The light moves on model with leaps(inside & outside) & now it become too bright in the pit . Can we have something between new & previous lighting variant ?

[OverStratos]

Hi Basco1

 

 

The ARK-5 antenna issue is fixed internally, some things didn´t make it to the update sometimes for the need to check if they are correctly implemented or sometimes they need a little more work. Regrding the Russian skin I will check that with the texture artist.

[OverStratos]

Something wrong with lighting again! The light moves on model with leaps(inside & outside) & now it become too bright in the pit . Can we have something between new & previous lighting variant ?

Hi Kaktyc,

 

 

Can you share some pics about the issue? I have been testing the new cockpit illumination and so far I haven´t seen any light/shadows issues.

Edited March 13, 2019 by OverStratos

[KAKTYC_11]

Hi, OverStratos ! It seems to me i was just little bit hurry in my report ! Such glitches may be result of new shaders generation process after update , cause after some restarts most of glitches go away ! But (i post that on discord too) in different versions of pit some glitches still present: in both of your versions light from gun flashes seen through the boards, also some areas of your pits look like them dont reflect light,but swallow it(on my opinion , between your versions shadows& reflections are better in weathered pit); overall in default version shadows look better ,but also flashes from guns are seen inside.

Some of art glitches i have reported berfore are stil on their place

P/S Like your MIG , good job! But still much work to do ... Good luck !

Edited March 13, 2019 by KAKTYC_11

[OverStratos]

@Basco1 from our internal version:

 

 

[Basco1]

@ OverStratos.......That looks superb OS,I look forward to seeing this in the very near future......hopefully

[some1]

Updated cockpit textures look fine to me.

[Baco]

Definitely not a bug, but a feature that can be improve, or you can learn to Skin ;)

[Basco1]

Bug....No,Unrealistic....Yes

 

ROFL...I've got to ask......The aircraft is a 'Russian aircraft'......so why did the modeller,with all respect,see fit to chose another country to base his bort numbers on it ?.......am I missing something here?

 

Surely it would've been best to base the numbering system on the Russian aircraft first,would'nt it ?.......or am I not being fair ?

 

I've got to say this......that bare metal skin is superb,easily the best I have ever witnessed in DCS,I mean,it really is something special,first class and kudos to the modeller who created it.I take my hat off to you Sir/Madam.

 

But......For me personally,this excellent skin is let down by the unrealistic bort numbering for it,which is a real pity.

 

I'm sure I'm right in thinking that the 'majority' of DCS players will be flying the Russian version.....not any Hungarian,Czech or Polish MiG-19 variant.If I'm wrong,shoot me down in flames,but I don't think I am

 

 

So I for one,I do hope RAZBAM give their MiG-19P bort numbering another thought.......that wonderful skin deserves it guys.

Edited March 14, 2019 by Basco1

[pepin1234]

If this is already posted just remove the thread. In the training lesson the tower channel said by the trainer is wrong (number 2), been the right chart channel for tower the number 1

[KAKTYC_11]

The issue with swallowing light gone after shaders rebuild(it was present at black surfaces like stick& throttle) - but i found a glitch with gauges glasses in "FACTORY NEW" cockpit - it look like shadowing of glass, lag behind shadowing of whole cockpit(for axample if one board became dark in shadows - glasses of gauges stay bright for some time & if you will continue flight with the same angle of lighting ,glass begin change from bright to dark step-by-step while all around is dark already)

Edited March 14, 2019 by KAKTYC_11