mvsgas Posted August 23, 2008 Author Posted August 23, 2008 To change the subject a bit. I was reading an article in Combat Aircraft magazine that there is no immediate plan to add JHMCS or any HMD (Head Mounted Display) to the F-22, maybe in a future upgrade but not in the next 5 to 10 years. Is that a smart choice? AFAIK,a lot of fighters have some form of it HMD, right? Rafale, Euro Fighter Typhoon, F-16, F-15, etc. Does the SU-35 (or any new version for that matter) JAS-39 and J-10 have any HMD. It just does not make since to me if you are trying to have the most advance A2A fighter, why not give it all tools for it. Why not add JHMCS? What could possibly be the reason? Your thoughts? To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
Esac_mirmidon Posted August 23, 2008 Posted August 23, 2008 No needed if you are stealth and the main portion of targets down are in BVR combat. If a formation of F-22 merged in a CAC they are doing something wrong. " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
GGTharos Posted August 23, 2008 Posted August 23, 2008 So far F-22's have defeated JHMCS equipped fighters anyway - keep in mind that you can cue the AIM-9 and 120 using radar - in a turning fight your vertical scan is probably about as far as the missile can be shot with JHMCS anyway. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
mvsgas Posted August 23, 2008 Author Posted August 23, 2008 Well, I mean more in terms of the information that the JHMCS gives the pilot, not so much to aim weapons but it does increase the ability and the ease of the pilot to use all his/hers systems. I just don't see why they are pushing so hard to integrated on ever other platform besides the F-22, I find that odd. Even the F-35 has a HMD, well F-35 is more as a requirement since it does not have a HUD. With HMD you would not even had to look inside the pit to see your altitude and speed. Not to mention all the other info that the HMD could give you. To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
mikoyan Posted August 25, 2008 Posted August 25, 2008 I think that the f-22 is getting antiquated compared with the f-35. I think that if everything goes well with the f-35 it is going to be the f-16 of the future.
mvsgas Posted August 25, 2008 Author Posted August 25, 2008 You really think the F-35 will be the F-16 of the future? I'm assuming you mean all the countries that have bough the F-16 and all the role that is can do, is that what you meant? If so, I'm not sure, to expensive I think the cost of that thing is ballooning very rapidly (Does anyone remember the F-111A and F-111B) and I doubt the US will let to many countries a stealth aircraft. You imagine that, how many countries have the F-16 and relations with each other are tense, imagine if they had stealth aircraft, they may get ideas and start fighting each other because they think they have the advantage. To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
eurofor Posted August 25, 2008 Posted August 25, 2008 Looking at the list of F-16 operators, I think the one most likely to start a war if they had the F-35 is the US... 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
mikoyan Posted August 25, 2008 Posted August 25, 2008 What I'm saying is that the story is repeating itself. A premier air to air fighter is needed because the soviets have a super fighter "mig-25" the f-15 is born to counter it. But the congress finds out that it is too expensive and the f-16, f-20 and f-18 are designed (they are still expensive compared with for example a french mirage 3). Then the soviets design the mig-29, mig-31 and su-27, equalizing the table, so the US produces the f-22 but again the congress thinks that the raptor is too expensive so the US manufactures create the f-35 (which is really expensive too, but a little less than the raptor) And if lockheed wants to still be on top of the market they are going to have to reduce the f-35 price or create a simplified version like they did with the f-16 (for example the venezuelan f-16s)
mvsgas Posted August 26, 2008 Author Posted August 26, 2008 What I'm saying is that the story is repeating itself. A premier air to air fighter is needed because the soviets have a super fighter "mig-25" the f-15 is born to counter it. But the congress finds out that it is too expensive and the f-16, f-20 and f-18 are designed (they are still expensive compared with for example a french mirage 3). Then the soviets design the mig-29, mig-31 and su-27, equalizing the table, so the US produces the f-22 but again the congress thinks that the raptor is too expensive so the US manufactures create the f-35 (which is really expensive too, but a little less than the raptor) And if lockheed wants to still be on top of the market they are going to have to reduce the f-35 price or create a simplified version like they did with the f-16 (for example the venezuelan f-16s) I get what you are saying, but I see more future to the JAS-39 upgrade version or maybe the Typhoon. I guess time will tell. To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
hitman Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Looking at the list of F-16 operators, I think the one most likely to start a war if they had the F-35 is the US... What makes you say that? I guess Israel (who is surrounded by muslims who wish Israel wiped off the map) wouldnt start a war with Iran anytime soon to keep them from gaining nuke tech... Intel 13900k @ 5.8ghz | 64gb GSkill Trident Z | MSI z790 Meg ACE | Zotac RTX4090 | Asus 1000w psu | Slaw RX Viper 2 pedals | VPForce Rhino/VKB MCE Ultimate + STECS Mk2 MAX / Virpil MongoosT50+ MongoosT50CM | Virpil TCS+/ AH64D grip/custom AH64D TEDAC | Samsung Odyssey G9 + Odyssey Ark | Next Level Racing Flight Seat Pro | WinWing F-18 MIPS | No more VR for this pilot.
Esac_mirmidon Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Dont said muslims, said Arabs. Is like saying that USA is surrounded by catholics trying to wipe they out. 2 " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
A.S Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 LooooL MY UNCLE HATES THE F-22A! My uncle used to be a mechanic on the F-15C eagle. About a year ago he retired and now is a civilian that washes the jets at our afb. I was talking him this week and he hates the raptor. He says its top speed with ab is 1.5 mach. He said its stealth is worst than the F-117. He thinks the F-15 is better. He says we only bought the f22 to give lockheed martin money. He says the air-force lies about everything to do the f22. He doesn't get classified info on the f22, he is not in that program. He only got info on the f15. Where does he come up with this? Source: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread385238/pg1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
159th_Viper Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 "That would be why your uncle only washes the planes" :megalol::megalol: I just tore a Gut-Muscle............ :megalol::megalol: Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
hitman Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Dont said muslims, said Arabs. Is like saying that USA is surrounded by catholics trying to wipe they out. Im atheist, and not all arabs are trying to kill israelis...muslims are. Intel 13900k @ 5.8ghz | 64gb GSkill Trident Z | MSI z790 Meg ACE | Zotac RTX4090 | Asus 1000w psu | Slaw RX Viper 2 pedals | VPForce Rhino/VKB MCE Ultimate + STECS Mk2 MAX / Virpil MongoosT50+ MongoosT50CM | Virpil TCS+/ AH64D grip/custom AH64D TEDAC | Samsung Odyssey G9 + Odyssey Ark | Next Level Racing Flight Seat Pro | WinWing F-18 MIPS | No more VR for this pilot.
Esac_mirmidon Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Israel are surrounded by Arab countries. People could be muslim, not countries. And if you are saying that muslims as a whole are trying to kill israelis...well i dont know what to responde but is a very sad affirmation and i am totally in disagree with it. Last post about it because forum rules. " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
Kuky Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 (edited) it so happened that Jewish created a state (Izrael) on land where there was no such country before... this means a state was created on land that used to belong to another coutry... and people... and it happens to be there are mostly Muslims living in the Middle East... I always say everything that goes on on this plannet (and whole universe) obays the laws of Physics and Mathematics... peoples behaviour is in same way (but please don't ask me to explain this and give examples as it would take forever to explain :D ) just in short... every action will result in equal and oposite reaction... same kind of instances (in lesser and different form) happen all over plannet... and all people beave more or less the same when placed in same hard circumstances Anyway... they are just using religion to lure people into their goal... this has been done tons of times throughout history Edited August 26, 2008 by Kuky 1 PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
A.S Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 The Ring of Power -- part 1 to 31 enjoy ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0GloGsOQ2c I think noone is bad in his nature if he is born !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But you can become very bad if you are used for it. More and more people open eyes, that´s the good part in it. Personally i would love to be guest in every culture and tradition and would also love to invite all as my guests. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Teknetinium Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 (edited) I would assume that conventional design could take more damage then delta wing. Because conventional design has more control-surfaces, whit FBW-system missing parts off the strocture could be compensated white other control surfaces. Take the Judish F-15(joke hitman 214th) as example, with elevators still attached to the plain made it possible to land, would not think Delta could do that whit out pretty big canards. Edited August 26, 2008 by Teknetium 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
nscode Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Here's an ad on the back of IEEE Spectrum magazine: THREE AIRCRAFT, A SINGLE MODEL, AND 80% COMMON CODE. THAT'S MODEL-BASED DESIGN To develop the unprecedented three-version F-35, engineers at Lockheed Martin created a common system model to simulate the avionics, propulsion, and other systems and to automatically generate final flight code. The result: reusable designs, rapid implementation, and global teamwork. The ad is from one of the leading mathematics software developers :) Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
hitman Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Israel are surrounded by Arab countries. People could be muslim, not countries. And if you are saying that muslims as a whole are trying to kill israelis...well i dont know what to responde but is a very sad affirmation and i am totally in disagree with it. Last post about it because forum rules. There are arab christians, and there are arab muslims. You dont see or hear about arab christians (the smallest minority)vying to conquer Israel, do you? These countries are by far and wide on the vast majority "muslim" nations, presided over muslim leaders. I dont understand how the US can be considered a warmonger when you have all these people doing this and doing that. You can disagree with it, but its still how it is. As it is, I dont really care what happens over there. Intel 13900k @ 5.8ghz | 64gb GSkill Trident Z | MSI z790 Meg ACE | Zotac RTX4090 | Asus 1000w psu | Slaw RX Viper 2 pedals | VPForce Rhino/VKB MCE Ultimate + STECS Mk2 MAX / Virpil MongoosT50+ MongoosT50CM | Virpil TCS+/ AH64D grip/custom AH64D TEDAC | Samsung Odyssey G9 + Odyssey Ark | Next Level Racing Flight Seat Pro | WinWing F-18 MIPS | No more VR for this pilot.
hitman Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 I would assume that conventional design could take more damage then delta wing. Because conventional design has more control-surfaces, whit FBW-system missing parts off the strocture could be compensated white other control surfaces. Take the Judish F-15(joke hitman 214th) as example, with elevators still attached to the plain made it possible to land, would not think Delta could do that whit out pretty big canards.Delta wing designs are considered to be the most advanced type of wing design with the large surface area and the ability to pass supersonic boundries with ease. You can hit any aircraft in a vital area and call it a kill...whether it would be the elevators/ailerons on a delta wing, or the elevators on an F-15. If you dont have lateral control over an aircraft, theres only one direction your going. Intel 13900k @ 5.8ghz | 64gb GSkill Trident Z | MSI z790 Meg ACE | Zotac RTX4090 | Asus 1000w psu | Slaw RX Viper 2 pedals | VPForce Rhino/VKB MCE Ultimate + STECS Mk2 MAX / Virpil MongoosT50+ MongoosT50CM | Virpil TCS+/ AH64D grip/custom AH64D TEDAC | Samsung Odyssey G9 + Odyssey Ark | Next Level Racing Flight Seat Pro | WinWing F-18 MIPS | No more VR for this pilot.
mvsgas Posted August 26, 2008 Author Posted August 26, 2008 So... How about all this crazy new aircraft designs ha? Has anyone seen any photos of a SU-35 HMD? Is it going to have a HMD? I was thinking, we have the SU-35, MIG-35 and F-35, is this a trend on itself? To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
mvsgas Posted August 28, 2008 Author Posted August 28, 2008 VIPERSPIKE posted this in Global Falcon website Is a video about the F-35 DAS, I wander how much of it is advertising their product and how much is actual capabilities available. http://www.es.northropgrumman.com/solutions/f35targeting/assets/eodasvideo.html To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
59th_LeFty Posted August 28, 2008 Posted August 28, 2008 I would assume that conventional design could take more damage then delta wing. Because conventional design has more control-surfaces, whit FBW-system missing parts off the strocture could be compensated white other control surfaces. Take the Judish F-15(joke hitman 214th) as example, with elevators still attached to the plain made it possible to land, would not think Delta could do that whit out pretty big canards. Dude, that idea..... Imagine an F-15 with DELTA wings. OMG, how fast would it be? 4Mach? :D [sIGPIC]http://www.forum.lockon.ru/signaturepics/sigpic5279_1.gif[/sIGPIC] I could shot down a Kitchen :smartass:
Recommended Posts