GGTharos Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 You aren't making sense. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
RvEYoda Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 I'm sorry Mono, i don't understand what you mean, but anyway, can't please em all. Those that like it, use it. Those that don't? well....nobody is forcing you to ;) S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
monotwix Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 That’s fine no acidush whatever that is. I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.
RvEYoda Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 Lol Mono :) S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
Mustang Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 That’s fine no acidush whatever that is. :huh: anyways, great progress in todays test runs in the RvE server, more improvements to come :)
Mugatu Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 That’s fine no acidush whatever that is. :no_sad:
hitman Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 i might have givrn this a test had i not broke my arm today..might even break me outta retirement too.
Lt.Seahawk Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) Im just wondering if there is already a download link or if this is still tested by few guys Edited September 21, 2008 by Lt.Seahawk DCS F-14 Tomcat Alley Discord Server: https://discord.gg/ceS859w
hitman Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 its a server script...only available if you fly their server. hop in it and test it if its still up.
Mugatu Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 ^^ Just log on to the RvE server and enjoy :)
PythonOne Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 Is it possible to get this mod for single player? Since some of them sounds pretty interesting and adds to realism like the radar, the airbrake, the countermeasures.
Lt.Seahawk Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 Oh ok thanks alot ill give it a try DCS F-14 Tomcat Alley Discord Server: https://discord.gg/ceS859w
MoGas Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 Where is the G-FORCE limitation for external tanks? :smartass:
RvEYoda Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 Where is the G-FORCE limitation for external tanks? :smartass: That is an excellent suggestion. Do you have exact numbers for how the F-15 should be limited? S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
Teknetinium Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) Everyone can use what they like on their servers, when it comes to measure squads muscles against each other there should not even be talk about what LUA script and so on to use. Squad matches are done whit Flaming Cliffs patched to 1.12b. Nothing less nothing more. On till ED team conform it as a downloadable patch!!! That must be told so we dont get this problems which LUA scripts to use while fighting etch other!!!! Amazing Work!!!!Q Like most of it but would like to see the 77/aim-120 unrealistic problems get solved to, Before giving the repetition of exploiter to ET users. Edited September 21, 2008 by Teknetinium 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
RvEYoda Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) rgr tek, but I don't think you can make that decision for the entire community yet. If both parties in a game/match/whateveryoucallit decide to adapt a certain functionality or mod, there is no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to Also concerning your point of ET exploit : The ET maddog exploit is surely a larger problem than the amraam (which does posses a documented uncaged firing function), however in the spirit of balance for the game we might cut the ET exploit detection out. Nothing is final yet Edited September 21, 2008 by =RvE=Yoda S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
Boberro Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 That is an excellent suggestion. Do you have exact numbers for how the F-15 should be limited? To 1G :lol: Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Teknetinium Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) rgr tek, note nothing is final in that doc. The ET maddog exploit is surely a larger problem than the amraam (which does posses a documented uncaged firing function), however in the spirit of balance for the game we might cut the ET exploit detection out. Its hard to say witch is more unrealistic in this case the 77/aim120 or the ET, we all know that all off them need their fixes, and we should approche them side by side not leaving the other at same unrealistic stage.. thank u for understanding me in this case. Edited September 21, 2008 by Teknetinium 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
RvEYoda Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) Its hard to say witch is more unrealistic in this case the 77/aim120 or the ET, we all know that all off them need their fixes, and we should approche them side by side not leaving the other at same unrealistic stage.. thank u for understanding me in this case. The problem with the current amraam is that it ALWAYS finds something if maddogged :P. It's a perfect "Scen everywhere and kill". You can even use it for close range radar. When you don't know where the bandit is, then you fire amraam and watch where it's going XD Naturally, this is even easier with R-77 :P (smoke) I'm thinking now, after considering it for a while.... we should enforce a lock for both R77 and 120 to deal with this.. To prevent people from firing amraam by mistake with no lock, I could just make so that it sets master arm off if there is no target, and if you override this anyway (because I can only toggle, not set "OFF"), then you get the same punishment as the ET exploiters get Edited September 21, 2008 by =RvE=Yoda 1 S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
X-man Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 Great work Yoda! :thumbup: 64th Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 135.181.115.54
Teknetinium Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) The problem with the current amraam is that it ALWAYS finds something if maddogged :P. It's a perfect "Scen everywhere and kill". You can even use it for close range radar. When you don't know where the bandit is, then you fire amraam and watch where it's going XD Naturally, this is even easier with R-77 :P (smoke) I'm thinking now, after considering it for a while.... we should enforce a lock for both R77 and 120 to deal with this.. To prevent people from firing amraam by mistake with no lock, I could just make so that it sets master arm off if there is no target, and if you override this anyway (because I can only toggle, not set "OFF"), then you get the same punishment as the ET exploiters get The disadvantage the aim-120/77 get is that u cant even spam it at 15km, but at least it prevents people to use it as radar and rainbow spamming. Taking away one realistic feature and putting two others in is what the deal is. Grate work dont take me wrong, I think most of the things are really good, but when it comes to missiles it gets harder. Edited September 21, 2008 by Teknetinium 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
RvEYoda Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 So tek how about preventing maddoding for ETs AND actives? S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
RvETito Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) That is an excellent suggestion. Do you have exact numbers for how the F-15 should be limited? MiG-29 is limited to 5G's with centerline tank, Su-27 is the same at 100%, AFAIK the 9G fuel limit of a Flanker is 5500kg. The MiG has no G limits on internal fuel, it can pull 9G's with 100%. I'll look in to the manual when I get back cause I'm pretty sure the Su-27 has severe limitations of G-load while carrying R-27 missiles, something like 5G's but I have to double check that. Edited September 21, 2008 by =RvE=Tito "See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89. =RvE=
Teknetinium Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 I dont know if its fear to AIM-120/77 users. they should be able to maddog at 15 to 20 km range. I dont have anything against it. 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
Recommended Posts