Jump to content

RvE Lockon Realism Mod Release Candidate 4 (Public Beta)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'm sorry Mono, i don't understand what you mean,

but anyway, can't please em all. Those that like it, use it.

Those that don't? well....nobody is forcing you to ;)

S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'

Posted

Lol Mono :)

S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'

Posted

Is it possible to get this mod for single player? Since some of them sounds pretty interesting and adds to realism like the radar, the airbrake, the countermeasures.

Posted
Where is the G-FORCE limitation for external tanks? :smartass:

 

That is an excellent suggestion.

Do you have exact numbers for how the F-15 should be limited?

S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'

Posted (edited)

Everyone can use what they like on their servers, when it comes to measure squads muscles against each other there should not even be talk about what LUA script and so on to use.

Squad matches are done whit Flaming Cliffs patched to 1.12b. Nothing less nothing more. On till ED team conform it as a downloadable patch!!!

 

That must be told so we dont get this problems which LUA scripts to use while fighting etch other!!!!

 

 

Amazing Work!!!!Q Like most of it but would like to see the 77/aim-120 unrealistic problems get solved to, Before giving the repetition of exploiter to ET users.

Edited by Teknetinium

Teknetinium 2017.jpg
                        51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
 

Posted (edited)

rgr tek, but I don't think you can make that decision for the entire community yet.

If both parties in a game/match/whateveryoucallit decide to adapt a certain functionality or

mod, there is no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to

 

Also concerning your point of ET exploit : The ET maddog exploit is surely a larger problem than

the amraam (which does posses a documented uncaged firing function),

however in the spirit of balance for the game we might cut the ET

exploit detection out. Nothing is final yet

Edited by =RvE=Yoda

S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'

Posted
That is an excellent suggestion.

Do you have exact numbers for how the F-15 should be limited?

 

 

To 1G :lol:

Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D

ಠ_ಠ



Posted (edited)
rgr tek, note nothing is final in that doc.

The ET maddog exploit is surely a larger problem than

the amraam (which does posses a documented uncaged firing function),

however in the spirit of balance for the game we might cut the ET

exploit detection out.

 

 

Its hard to say witch is more unrealistic in this case the 77/aim120 or the ET, we all know that all off them need their fixes, and we should approche them side by side not leaving the other at same unrealistic stage..

thank u for understanding me in this case.

Edited by Teknetinium

Teknetinium 2017.jpg
                        51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
 

Posted (edited)
Its hard to say witch is more unrealistic in this case the 77/aim120 or the ET, we all know that all off them need their fixes, and we should approche them side by side not leaving the other at same unrealistic stage..

thank u for understanding me in this case.

 

The problem with the current amraam is that it ALWAYS finds something if maddogged :P. It's a perfect "Scen everywhere and kill".

 

You can even use it for close range radar. When you don't know where the

bandit is, then you fire amraam and watch where it's going XD

Naturally, this is even easier with R-77 :P (smoke)

 

I'm thinking now, after considering it for a while....

we should enforce a lock for both R77 and 120 to deal with this..

 

To prevent people from firing amraam by mistake with no lock, I could just

make so that it sets master arm off if there is no target, and if you

override this anyway (because I can only toggle, not set "OFF"), then

you get the same punishment as the ET exploiters get

Edited by =RvE=Yoda
  • Like 1

S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'

Posted (edited)
The problem with the current amraam is that it ALWAYS finds something if maddogged :P. It's a perfect "Scen everywhere and kill".

 

You can even use it for close range radar. When you don't know where the

bandit is, then you fire amraam and watch where it's going XD

Naturally, this is even easier with R-77 :P (smoke)

 

I'm thinking now, after considering it for a while....

we should enforce a lock for both R77 and 120 to deal with this..

 

To prevent people from firing amraam by mistake with no lock, I could just

make so that it sets master arm off if there is no target, and if you

override this anyway (because I can only toggle, not set "OFF"), then

you get the same punishment as the ET exploiters get

 

The disadvantage the aim-120/77 get is that u cant even spam it at 15km, but at least it prevents people to use it as radar and rainbow spamming.

Taking away one realistic feature and putting two others in is what the deal is.

Grate work dont take me wrong, I think most of the things are really good, but when it comes to missiles it gets harder.

Edited by Teknetinium

Teknetinium 2017.jpg
                        51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
 

Posted

So tek how about preventing maddoding for ETs AND actives?

S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'

Posted (edited)
That is an excellent suggestion.

Do you have exact numbers for how the F-15 should be limited?

 

MiG-29 is limited to 5G's with centerline tank, Su-27 is the same at 100%, AFAIK the 9G fuel limit of a Flanker is 5500kg. The MiG has no G limits on internal fuel, it can pull 9G's with 100%. I'll look in to the manual when I get back cause I'm pretty sure the Su-27 has severe limitations of G-load while carrying R-27 missiles, something like 5G's but I have to double check that.

Edited by =RvE=Tito

"See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89.

=RvE=

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...