FullerGer Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 Wow, that would be awesome to have this model in DCS. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 Good to hear, sds. By the way, just a curiosity regarding another model of Precise3DModeling, why is the Su-35 loaded with R-60 and R-27 instead of R-73 and R-77, considering these are more modern and etc? Request by costumer or something?
NRG-Vampire Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 For DCS: A-10C Warthog, we'll be instead be using a highly detailed KC-135. :director:PIX, PIX ! PLZ show us KC-135 PIX :worthy:
sds Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 Good to hear, sds. By the way, just a curiosity regarding another model of Precise3DModeling, why is the Su-35 loaded with R-60 and R-27 instead of R-73 and R-77, considering these are more modern and etc? Request by costumer or something? Simply, we load those missiles because we don't have others :) [sIGPIC]http://precise3dmodeling.com/FTP/sign_04.jpg[/sIGPIC]
Zorg_DK Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 nice shot on the previous page :thumbup: "There are only 10 types of people in the world — those who understand binary, and those who don't." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
EagleEye Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Very nice! Thanks for the In-Game shots Valery! Deutsche DCS-Flughandbücher SYSSpecs: i7-4790K @4GHz|GA-Z97X-SLI|16GB RAM|ASUS GTX1070|Win10 64bit|TrackIR5|TM Warthog/Saitek Pro Pedals
Shaman Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 Looks wonderfully in-game! 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
shu77 Posted February 7, 2010 Posted February 7, 2010 That looks fantastic, is it resource intensive? Hornet, Super Carrier, Warthog & (II), Mustang, Spitfire, Albatross, Sabre, Combined Arms, FC3, Nevada, Gulf, Normandy, Syria AH-6J i9 10900K @ 5.0GHz, Gigabyte Z490 Vision G, Cooler Master ML120L, Gigabyte RTX3080 OC Gaming 10Gb, 64GB RAM, Reverb G2 @ 2480x2428, TM Warthog, Saitek pedals & throttle, DIY collective, TrackIR4, Cougar MFDs, vx3276-2k Combat Wombat's Airfield & Enroute Maps and Planning Tools
Scudslaker Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 any news on Mod release date?) whould be great to implement that model to DCS and FC2 aswell.. keep it up Scud TM HOTAS WH :joystick:, Saitek Pro Pedals, Track IR 4, 2xJoyWarrier, 1x KeyWarrior, i52500k @4600MHz, ASUS P8Z68-V Pro, NV 670GT, SSD+ WD BC+ WD Raptor, 32HD:pilotfly:[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Scart Posted June 1, 2010 Posted June 1, 2010 any news? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] летаю на заказ, дорого... "The FlankerForce"© -=приостановлено=- Лучшее средство завоевания господства в воздухе - танк посередине ВПП © не установлено АХТУНГ! эксперды атакуют! Только отсутствие разведанных запасов нефти в Антарктиде, удерживает пингвинов от демократии.
Vecko Posted June 1, 2010 Posted June 1, 2010 I wanna buy your SU-33 model guys, how much?:D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Virtual Aerial Operations
Napa Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 New 3D model C-17 Globemaster III by precise3dmodeling.com Sorry for reviving an old thread but are we ever going to see this model in DCS? C-17 desperately needs an update. I can't stand the older model. Intel i7 12700k / Corsair H150i Elite Capellix / Asus TUF Z690 Wifi D4 / Corsair Dominator 32GB 3200Mhz / Corsair HW1000W / 1x Samsung SSD 970 Evo Plus 500Gb + 1 Corsair MP600 1TB / ASUS ROG Strix RTX 3080 OC V2 / Fractal Design Meshify 2 / HOTAS Warthog / TFRP Rudder / TrackIR 5 / Dell U2515h 25" Monitor 1440p
Kuky Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 2 of these on the base and I'd have 10fps :D PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
TOMCATZ Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 @ Kuky - You`re damned right. I have exactly the same problems with the DCS F-15 and F-15e Eagles. They simply have to many Polygons : arround 280.000 per plane: thats much to heavy! Born to fly but forced to work.
Kuky Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 @ Kuky - You`re damned right. I have exactly the same problems with the DCS F-15 and F-15e Eagles. They simply have to many Polygons : arround 280.000 per plane: thats much to heavy! For the moment yes... but it's to be future proof as surely in 1-2 years video cards will be about the fast and then it'll be more acceptable. Right now if I have flight of 4 apaches and F-15C on the base my FPS are in single digits but I also do run higher visibility distance then standard and that requires also lot more processing power so I'm not blaming it on the game. I am patiently waiting for the next gen of video cards that will be 28nm and compared to current 40nm you're looking at double the number of transistors on same GPU die... and bit less power required... so hope is there :smartass: 1 PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
Rikus Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 @ Kuky - You`re damned right. I have exactly the same problems with the DCS F-15 and F-15e Eagles. They simply have to many Polygons : arround 280.000 per plane: thats much to heavy! Look the new Su33 model, lots of poligons and no drop of fps Greetings
john_X Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 these models are for rendering , not for insertig them in sims. the high number of the polys isn't necesary, a good low poly model can look as good as this if it has a high res skin and the polys are put where they need to be. and i don't think this model was ever made for public release, precise3dmodeling.com usually sells its models for a sum of money, of what i know.
TOMCATZ Posted June 12, 2011 Posted June 12, 2011 (edited) sure guys, I`m a big fan of highly modeled planes but it allways have to useable in online games. So I think that a modern aircraft shape should not have over about 150.000 faces. So these models works very well with actually hardware and it is possible to add a lot of details. The models on following pics have arround 60.000 faces and works very fine together with hundreds of other jets: Uploaded with ImageShack.us But well- ED shows one more time the way into the future and hardware limits still are not an argument. Edited June 12, 2011 by TOMCATZ Born to fly but forced to work.
Mazinger Posted June 13, 2011 Posted June 13, 2011 The new 3D model "Hawkeye" AWACS of 1.1.0.8 patch, looks great. Please renew the C17 model, looks very primitive compared with the other aircraft.
aaron886 Posted June 13, 2011 Posted June 13, 2011 The models on following pics have arround 60.000 faces and works very fine together with hundreds of other jets All well and good but I don't think this is the venue to plug your models with a bunch of pics... ;) That's pretty off-topic.
TOMCATZ Posted June 13, 2011 Posted June 13, 2011 All well and good but I don't think this is the venue to plug your models with a bunch of pics... ;) That's pretty off-topic. Sure- Sorry :smilewink: Born to fly but forced to work.
Moa Posted June 13, 2011 Posted June 13, 2011 (edited) All well and good but I don't think this is the venue to plug your models with a bunch of pics... ;) That's pretty off-topic. Actually, this thread is about 3D. He's not spamming so seems pretty legit to me. Edit: Actually, thanks for all your contributions TOMCATZ. IMHO there was nothing wrong with your post as you were showing how excellent models can be achieved with a set number of polygons (which the thread had started discussing). Please keep up the good work and don't hesitate to show your great models - I for one certainly appreciate them. Edited June 13, 2011 by Moa
aaron886 Posted June 13, 2011 Posted June 13, 2011 Please keep up the good work and don't hesitate to show your great models - I for one certainly appreciate them. Of course we do... this isn't about whether or not you or I appreciate his work. There was no need for you to interpret my suggestion so negatively. This is a thread about precise3dmodeling's C-17... I think the title is pretty clear! I love seeing pictures of Tom's work in threads he's made for his models, or the screenshot thread, etc.
john_X Posted June 14, 2011 Posted June 14, 2011 @MoaActually, this thread is about 3D. He's not spamming so seems pretty legit to me. Edit: Please keep up the good work and don't hesitate to show your great models - I for one certainly appreciate them. i'm sure you do appreciate them, specially when they are for free. Anyway, did any guy from precise3dmodelling aprove that this C-17 is made for a fc2 mod? because if not, this thread it just doesn't belong here. we all can search some very good models, from turbosquid from example, and create new threads here but those models are not for public purpose, they are just for individual use and against of a sum of money.
Recommended Posts