Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Thanks :) , im having a hard time animating the rear wheels properly :(

 

migwire1bn.png

 

50.800 polys, but i can cut alot away still, but i have to add a new pilot object, and i can move the detail level a bit at some places.

 

I mostly use cilinders, cones, and an occasional box.

 

Good luck with modeling!

 

mig212hp.png

mig223sv.png

 

Everything is animated properly, except the rear wheels. I only hope someone can show me how the rear wheels retract. I want to do it realistically.

Ohhh boy! This is extremely good!! I hope we will get MiG-21 flyable in some future Lock On versions!

Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

holy cow......wow....ED please implement this. Allochtoon please send this to ED. I love the mig 21. Its a good old fighter that has proved itself in war. Man....a flyable Mig 21 would be amazing...but atleast a AI one is good for making mission scenarios.

WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro |

|A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA|

Posted

Unfortunatelly it looks like nobody :( ... But this model is really piece of art. I agree with You mates - MiG-21 must be implemented as main fighter of many countries even now! It should be done before Su-17!

Posted

Allochtoon, will you be sending this to ED? If so, when do you think it can be added because i know theres also the issue of lod and damage model...etc.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

I think the mig21 is not as pretty as when i started on it. Now i prefer for a flyable sopwith camel with sticks of dynamite in the pilots backpack. :P

  • Like 1
migtoon0xo.gif
Posted

NOOOOO, we want mig 21!!!

 

 

Maby, try to make a mig-21-93! with a clear windshield and enlarged wingspines and what can carry the R-77 and the R-73!

And then they can add India to LOMAC:smilewink:

DCS World, A10C, AV8B, M2k, FA18C, FC3, MIG21

Posted
NOOOOO, we want mig 21!!!

 

 

Maby, try to make a mig-21-93! with a clear windshield and enlarged wingspines and what can carry the R-77 and the R-73!

And then they can add India to LOMAC:smilewink:

I want to build a model that has the biggest chance of being implemented into lomac. In the process i chose the MiG-21bis Fishbed-L. In what way is the 93 version different? Tell me all the details.

migtoon0xo.gif
Posted

Doesn't a Lancer have better chance?

 

I understand that the problem could be the air to ground radar :noexpression:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

I5 4670k, 32GB, GTX 1070, Thrustmaster TFRP, G940 Throttle extremely modded with Bodnar 0836X and Bu0836A,

Warthog Joystick with F-18 grip, Oculus Rift S - Almost all is made from gifts from friends, the most expensive parts at least

Posted

There are 2 lancers, the A en the C

 

The C is pure A 2 A and the A is A 2 G;)

 

Put i thought that the C also could do A 2 G because there is a possibility to fit the LANTIRN pod underneath it's belly

 

But, the Bison can carry A 2 G weapons though...also TV guided...

I don't know if it has an A 2 G radar but i sure can carry the weapons, the same as the Su 25T....with tv screen but then in the MFD!

 

Same as the Lancer.....But the problem with the lancer is, no country except Romania uses it, so ED will need to put Romania in the game and then it just has one plane and nothing more, but if they would put the bison in it, India has the mig 29, mig 27, su 30 and also the Bison...

DCS World, A10C, AV8B, M2k, FA18C, FC3, MIG21

Posted
Doesn't a Lancer have better chance?

 

I understand that the problem could be the air to ground radar :noexpression:

AG radar except dumb bomb dropping is a problem. So what version should i go for then?

migtoon0xo.gif
Posted

Part of Romania is already on the map so is not as far as India. Romania is now part of NATO so in a fictive scenario it will be posible to have bases with NATO aircrafts doing missions in Black Sea.

 

Also Romania have big chances to buy in the future some second Hand F-16s :) so when Tank killers will be out...

 

30.jpg

 

http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/AWA1/601-700/walk650_Mig-21_Colin/walk650.htm

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

I5 4670k, 32GB, GTX 1070, Thrustmaster TFRP, G940 Throttle extremely modded with Bodnar 0836X and Bu0836A,

Warthog Joystick with F-18 grip, Oculus Rift S - Almost all is made from gifts from friends, the most expensive parts at least

Posted

I think you should try to contact ED. Maybe they would accept doing the work to insert Mig-21 in Lomac if a good model/documentation is provided and the MIG-21 fits into their scenario.

 

If they say... "we would" then you should come to an acord with them on what version.

 

Personaly I think an insertion of Mig-21 is not posible in near future but with the future projects like "Tank Killers" we don't know :).

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

I5 4670k, 32GB, GTX 1070, Thrustmaster TFRP, G940 Throttle extremely modded with Bodnar 0836X and Bu0836A,

Warthog Joystick with F-18 grip, Oculus Rift S - Almost all is made from gifts from friends, the most expensive parts at least

Posted

I think the chances of it becoming a fly-able are slim at best, so do whatever version you fancy. As long as it's an AI aircraft noone is going to care about A/G-radar etc. (didn't the Lancer-C get axed anyway?).

Posted

Hi Allochtoon, I'm happy that you are back!

It's a good idea to make a Lancer (even I prefer the MiG-21bis), but I think it is better to have an ED opinion. You can ask them.

 

Edit: too late...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...