Thump Posted January 16 Posted January 16 The sheer amount of BS magic dust they are going to have to douse this module in will be meme worthy. 14 2
SilentGun Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I just want to know if ED has permission from Lockheed to create an interpretation of their aircraft. As with many other modules in DCS (F-18, F16 and AH64) a complete recreation of systems isnt needed to provide a realistic depiction of the aircraft so im totally fine with them not modeling all systems available. Im also hoping that the community has enough common sense to not start "warthundering" documents to make their favorite plane more realistic 7 Link to my Imgur screenshots and motto http://imgur.com/a/Gt7dF One day in DCS... Vipers will fly along side Tomcats... Bugs with Superbugs, Tiffy's with Tornado's, Fulcrums with Flankers and Mirage with Rafales... :)The Future of DCS is a bright one:)
Sandman1330 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 7 minutes ago, PFT_Orph3us said: Gents, in my humble opinion, ED will do this no matter what. Let our wallets vote. Oh make no mistake, it will sell like hotcakes. Just look at the popularity of mods for 4+ and 5th gen jets. It will probably also bring in new crowds, both of which are good for ED's budget. My prediction is this will result in a bit of a split. Hardcore / traditional fans, the longer standing playerbase, will play on servers that likely won't even include this module. The same servers that already don't allow mods. Life will go on as if it doesn't even exist. A separate, newer playerbase will coalesce around this module to play in less realistic, less "traditional DCS" servers, probably with heavy inclusion of mods to give it a contemporary environment in which to fly. There's no way the "traditional" DCS playerbase is going to accept this module, much as they already don't accept mods. But it will definitely grow the playerbase in a different demographic. Edited January 16 by Sandman1330 8 1 Ryzen 7 5800X3D / Asus Crosshair VI Hero X370 / Corsair H110i / Sapphire Nitro+ 6800XT / 32Gb G.Skill TridentZ 3200 / Samsung 980 Pro M.2 / Virpil Warbrd base + VFX and TM grips / Virpil CM3 Throttle / Saitek Pro Combat pedals / Reverb G2
PFT_Orph3us Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 44 minutes ago, YoYo said: Now its a time for Su-57 ;>. Maybe the famous Mig-31 but from the movie FIREFOX. What would You say? ...and second more thing, very soon in DCS Edited January 16 by PFT_Orph3us 7
stburr91 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Just make it all up is fine...for Flaming Cliffs aircraft, not so much for full fidelity modules. 3
Heli Shed Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) Well good luck with this ED. Personally, I think you should focus on actually making sure that those modules you have released over the past god knows how many years I've given you, are actually finished and not borked on every patch release................... Along with missions............... Along with campaigns........... That would be nice.................. wouldn't it? Edited January 16 by Heli Shed 24 1 Come pay us a visit on YouTube - search for HELI SHED
Strannix Posted January 16 Posted January 16 The main goal of 5th generation fighter like F 35 is to deal with highly contested environment with a lot of EW threats. This is exactly what we don't have for sure and will never have. 13 2
Thump Posted January 16 Posted January 16 It exists for the sole purpose of distraction. Jingle the keys. 10
polosat1y Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Wow. So, apparently there is not enough information to give FW-190 GM-1 system. All info is there, but one key peice is not documented enough to make simulation. But this is not the case with entire F-35 somehow. 21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Corsair Vengeance LPX c16 3200Mhz 64Gb RAM, MERC 310 AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, B550 Aorus Elite V2, Thermaltake 850W, BeQuiet 802, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420. Winwing Orion 2 HOTAS, F-16EX Stick, F-15EX Throttles. Saitek Rudder Pedals. TrackIR 5. Joy extension. Meta Quest 3.
AJaromir Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) I'm skepticalI about DCS: F-35 I don't want Full fidelity modules. I want study level modules. Edited January 16 by AJaromir 6
Flanky83 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I expected everything but this fighter. They got me! That is just brilliant! As a lot of nations will get this fighter, I’m 100% sure I will buy it if it looks close to FF module! But F-35 is no Naval version, I will definitely miss carrier operation with this module… If the module release date is delayed, this will just add realism to the F-35 . 7
Hentai Paisen Posted January 16 Posted January 16 What an absolute joke. I play DCS because I can cope that things are simulated to at least a bare minimum of """"realism"""" but there's just no way to get even close to that with an F-35. If you want to guesstimate something how about you guesstimate a MiG-31 to get some semblance of parity for red vs blue? 29 3
Citizen Posted January 16 Posted January 16 This makes a mockery of every time anyone was told a system was impossible to produce in DCS because there wasn't enough documentation. 39 3
Ash Lynx Posted January 16 Posted January 16 **bang** *shoots razbam in the back of the head* oh damn you saw that, uhhh F35 coming to dcs. Source? Youtube obviously. 14
Beirut Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I'll take an F-35. Don't care if it missing a few things, I just want a nice DCS representation of it so I can enjoy flying it around. 14 Some of the planes, but all of the maps!
stburr91 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 6 minutes ago, Strannix said: The main goal of 5th generation fighter like F 35 is to deal with highly contested environment with a lot of EW threats. This is exactly what we don't have for sure and will never have. Not to mention that there are no red aircraft to go up against this one, it just doesn't make any sense to add an F-35. 5
Semaphore Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, polosat1y said: Wow. So, apparently there is not enough information to give FW-190 GM-1 system. All info is there, but one key peice is not documented enough to make simulation. But this is not the case with entire F-35 somehow. Yep... think ED are going against their own principles of only producing 100% accurate modules because there is absolutley no way they have all the matereial to create the F35A accurately.... 12 3
Lorry Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Ash Lynx said: **bang** *shoots razbam in the back of the head* oh damn you saw that, uhhh F35 coming to dcs. Source? Youtube obviously. The emotions I have gone over the past hour is bananas. To end it with Yeah we got the info from youtube. damn near killed me. Were not talking about learning how to drain oil from a car here ED. 8
Arecibo Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I’ll probably give this a miss. The F-35 cockpit has all the visual appeal of a truckstop ATM. 11 2 In Training: Phantom F-4E / In the Hanger: F-14, F-16 Maps: Afghanistan / Syria / Nevada Hardware: Winwing Orion2 HOTAS Metal Warthog / Winwing Orion2 ViperAce EX Throttle / Thrustmaster T-Flight Rudders Head Tracking: AI Track + OpenTrack
polosat1y Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Semaphore said: Yep... think ED are going against their own principles of only producing 100% accurate modules because there is absolutley no way they have all the matereial to create the F35A accurately.... Well, if YouTube is the source than let's vote for Su-57. And after that for project Aurora and UAPs. 11 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Corsair Vengeance LPX c16 3200Mhz 64Gb RAM, MERC 310 AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, B550 Aorus Elite V2, Thermaltake 850W, BeQuiet 802, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420. Winwing Orion 2 HOTAS, F-16EX Stick, F-15EX Throttles. Saitek Rudder Pedals. TrackIR 5. Joy extension. Meta Quest 3.
J3ST3R Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Not really sure how I feel about this one. For years, customers have been told "no we can't make that because of the lack of data and documents available". Now, you can get all that information from watching some videos. DCS's main selling point is the accuracy of the flight models and the attention to the minor details that other platforms don't provide. I'm happy to see more aircraft but this one is a bit far fetched given where dcs has come from in my opinion. 14 2 INTEL i9 9900k @ 5Ghz, Asus Z390 strix ROG, 32gb 3200mhz Ram, Nvidia GTX 1080Ti, Corsair RM850i, Corsair H110i,, HP REVERB, Win 10 64bit. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Citizen Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Will the ADFX-01 Morgan have the Multi-Purpose Burst Missile and Tactical Laser System at launch or can we expect that later in early access? 4
Beirut Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Very happy with the F-35. My Kola map awaits it. 8 Some of the planes, but all of the maps!
PawlaczGMD Posted January 16 Posted January 16 This looks like a cash grab TBH. There is no way they can model the F-35 to FF standard based on airshow videos and pilot feedback only. But it will definitely sell to the crowd that wants the latest most performant planes at all cost. Imagine how much dev time this project will take away from much needed core improvements such as AI, dynamic campaign, VR performance, etc. Also, if proper documentation is no longer needed for a module, can we get some Flankers in here? 31
T.Power Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Utterly pointless, not interested. 15 "For many the glass is half empty whilst for others it is half full, but for some, the milk is sour." - Unknown French Philosopher
Recommended Posts