TomaToma Posted August 2 Posted August 2 i want to get a budget pc for dcs and im wondering is an rtx 3060 12GB or rtx 5060 8GB better for dcs
Mustang Posted August 3 Posted August 3 5060 will outperform the 3060 at say, 1080p for sure but if you're aiming for higer resolutions you will be limited with that 8gb, depends on if you're aiming for monitor use or VR. 1
Aapje Posted August 3 Posted August 3 If you have the option and the pricing is decent in your region, I would get a 9060 XT. 1
Holbeach Posted August 3 Posted August 3 The 5060 has 44% more performance than the 3060 and is slightly under my 2080Ti I run DCS on full settings on a 1440 monitor. So the 5060 will be the better of the two. ... 1 ASUS 2600K 3.8. P8Z68-V. ASUS ROG Strix RTX 2080Ti, RAM 16gb Corsair. M2 NVME 2gb. 2 SSD. 3 HDD. 1 kW ps. X-52. Saitek pedals. ..
diego999 Posted August 3 Posted August 3 4 hours ago, Aapje said: If you have the option and the pricing is decent in your region, I would get a 9060 XT. This is good advice, as both of your options aren't good.
Pilotasso Posted August 4 Posted August 4 (edited) neither, wait for the NVIDIA refresh (5070 super) or like mentioned above the 9060XT. VRAM is life. Edited August 4 by Pilotasso .
virgo47 Posted August 4 Posted August 4 Depending on what you wanna see (details), don't even think about 8GB VRAM. Also, will you plug it into PCIe v3, 4 or 5? If you have an older PCIe 3.0, 5060 would be further throttled when loading textures and stuff from RAM to VRAM as it uses only 8 lanes. But having enough VRAM is better. That does not mean that 3060 12GB is a better option here, it really is slower in the end because of raw performance, not to mention support for newer DLSS, etc. I upgraded from 3060 to 5060 Ti 16GB and it was nearly double the performance. (And yes, I have regularly allocated more than 8GB of VRAM, depending on the mission.) So 3060 vs 5060 8GB... I'd choose none, really. Perhaps if you'd massively lower your texture quality - but what's he point then? As for the memory consumption, just check my video comparing map in otherwise empty mission (timestamp goes right to the VRAM usage): Hope that helps you making the right decision. 3 L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Czar Posted August 4 Posted August 4 (edited) Tough times for GPUs at the moment. What @virgo47 said is on point. On 8/3/2025 at 12:09 AM, Mustang said: 5060 will outperform the 3060 at say, 1080p for sure but if you're aiming for higer resolutions you will be limited with that 8gb, depends on if you're aiming for monitor use or VR. It is better to avoid using the VRAM tips for general games in DCS. It is not only resolution that will scale the usage of your VRAM. DCS has massive assets and textures, unlike the normal videogame that can run on a console, so you'll need VRAM to load the assets 1080p or not. It is one of the main reasons hardware outlets said that 12gb of VRAM on a 3060 was "too much" and not necessary. They don't play DCS or memory heavy sims nor majority of their audience. Textures anything other than maximum is a harsh degrade and not recommended in older modules as the cockpit will become unreadable in everything other than gauges. Getting your hands on a 16gb+ current gen card or nothing is the best way to go with this. Best of luck with the build. Edited August 4 by Czar66 1
TheFreshPrince Posted August 9 Posted August 9 I run a 4060 with 8GB and it's totally fine for 2K resolution with fairly maxxed out settings. So the 5060 would be the best option OR pay a bit more for the Ti version. This is because DLSS and DLAA are king right now in DCS. Every AMD card will s*ck because newer FSR is not supported. VRAM size is not everything, VRAM speed is also a factor. I tested four cards in the last months: 3070, 3070ti, 7700XT and the 4060. The AMD card had great FPS, but the worst looks. The Nvidia cards are just superior in DCS.
virgo47 Posted August 9 Posted August 9 (edited) VRAM is OK unless it suddenly is not. The problem is that with the very same mission, you can get various results with various aircraft. E.g. these are my numbers for UH-1H on Germany map: The helo is actually hot, and with another CH-47F in view. And this is the number with a cold CH-47F after the game finally loaded all the cockpit stuff: This is a brutal difference. So think about that as well. That said, faster memory (nVidia 5xxx wins here) and faster PCIe bus (depends on the MB)... and also PCIe lanes (depends, often AMD has more in the same price range) - this all affects your experience when you run out of VRAM. But the best thing is not to, if possible. Edited August 9 by virgo47 L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Zebra1-1 Posted August 11 Posted August 11 On 8/2/2025 at 9:29 AM, TomaToma said: i want to get a budget pc for dcs and im wondering is an rtx 3060 12GB or rtx 5060 8GB better for dcs Honestly, budget PC and DCS (or sims in general) don't really go together IMO. You can get away with using an older CPU, but VRAM is a must. Especially if you are considering VR. Personally, I wouldn't get a card with less than 16GB VRAM. 24GB if you are planning to go VR. Despite sims becoming more optimized, they are also becoming more intensive and you don't want to be upgrading GPUs every release cycle.
draconus Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago On 8/11/2025 at 7:24 PM, Zebra1-1 said: Honestly, budget PC and DCS (or sims in general) don't really go together IMO. There are different people and some also have the same dream to fly. If there is no more money, there is simply no more money or they don't want to spent more. So there's no use to comments like "none, buy better card". Not all have to run 4K at 120Hz and there are graphic options for a reason. I'd take faster card over more VRAM any day. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Hiob Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I would rather buy a used 3080 (12GB) or 4080, than one of the original options. That said, I would probably opt for AMD in this day and age. The 5000 series and the latest bad drivers from NVIDIA are really a slap in the face of someone that is really still very deeply in love with the 1080ti (GOAT). Apart from the 5090, which at least has decent performance (but for what cost) the 5000 series is really, really bad compared to older GeForce generations. Add the cut off PhysX to the mix... (gone are the days of backwards compatibility).... "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
Raven (Elysian Angel) Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) The latest AMD graphics cards are really good, especially for the money. So a 9060XT (or 9070XT if you’re willing to pay a bit more) is a very good choice for those on a budget. I’d still be on AMD myself if the Varjo Aero wasn’t nvidia-only. Edited 4 hours ago by Raven (Elysian Angel) Typo Spoiler Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings Win11 Pro 24H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON
Recommended Posts