DCS: Roadmap (unofficial - NO DISCUSSION HERE)

[Silver_Dragon]

AutoUpdater Update

Version 2.6.16:

- Workaround broken transparent proxies used by some ISPs.

Solves the "HTTP 400 Bad Request" problem.

- Fixed argument handling in the repair command.

If given an improper argument the repair always succeeded,

but set the branch to a given value after that. So those

who incorrectly called repair with a module name, not a

branch name, started to get "HTTP 404" for all subsequent operations.

 

DCS: World 1.5.2.49392141 Release / Beta / Update 2 Available

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2652491&postcount=13

Edited January 22, 2016 by Silver_Dragon

[FoxHoundELite]

should we update this thread with the Tucano from RAZBAM?

[Silver_Dragon]

should we update this thread with the Tucano from RAZBAM?

I see the info now. Roadmap update in progress.

 

Enviado desde mi GT-S7580 mediante Tapatalk

[Silver_Dragon]

Add New Kutnesov 3D model from https://vk.com/eagle.dynamics

[Silver_Dragon]

Add new features, modules and functionality to Roadmap from January 29 newsletter

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2659915&postcount=14

[Blech]

Add new features, modules and functionality to Roadmap from January 29 newsletter

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2659915&postcount=14

 

 

Hi,

 

Can´t find the F/A-18C as module (?)

 

"In parallel we continue to work on the F/A-18C Hornet. We are currently working on the cockpit and setting up its functionality. Later in 2016 we plan to release the Hornet as an “Early Access” product that will allow you to participate in early testing."

[Silver_Dragon]

The F/A-18C has a module in develop by ED from some years ago.

[Rabbl]

F-5E Tiger II and Viggen maybe add them in upcoming release list?

[Silver_Dragon]

Fixed

 

Baltic Dragon has put the first trailer of Mirage2000C to DCS: W

[Silver_Dragon]

release of A-10C: 16-2 Red Flag Campaign on DCS: W 2.0.1

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2667468&postcount=9

[Silver_Dragon]

New / updated 3D models on DCS: W 2.0.1

 

APU-60-1 missile rail

 

Su-27 Pilot

 

Kh-41 missile

 

UPK-23-250 Gun pod

 

Su-27 Ejection seat

 

Su-27 Pilot parachute

 

L-39ZA

 

M559 bomb rack

 

OFAB-100-110TU bomb

 

PK-3 Gun Pod

[Silver_Dragon]

From ED Facebook, two new pics of Hormuz

[ame]https://www.facebook.com/eagle.dynamics/posts/10156585704385341[/ame]

 

[Rikus]

Hope is work in progress, Dubai doesn´t look too much like those pictures in night.

[NineLine]

Hope is work in progress, Dubai doesn´t look too much like those pictures in night.

 

If it wasnt a WIP, it would be in full release right now I would think...

[Silver_Dragon]

Add to non official modules section, the Red Wing simulations: Dornier Alpha Jet

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=160689

Edited February 16, 2016 by Silver_Dragon

[Silver_Dragon]

RAZBAM make some harrier develop changes, first version coming has AV-8B night attack, next has GR-7/-9, and last the AV-8B harrier II plus.

 

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=160816

[Silver_Dragon]

Change Tucano designation to AT-27

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=161490

[BlackLion213]

Hi Silver Dragon,

 

I read that ED is developing the "CVN-71 Nimitz" aircraft carrier (per your words :)).

 

The newsletter mentioned a "Nimitz class carrier" - do you know that it is the USS Theodore Roosevelt - CVN-71?

 

Interestingly, I googled it and CVN-71 hasn't changed much at all from 1988 till 2010. The major visible features (masts, etc) seem more or less the same. Might be a great choice to represent a current and 1980s Nimitz carrier - just a thought.

 

Thanks for the info and continuous updates!

 

-Nick

[Silver_Dragon]

sorry BlackLion213, has the CVN-70. I missmath the number :(

[BlackLion213]

No problem, just curious. :)

 

-Nick

[tifafan]

I think the future Nimitz could be CVN-74

 

 

[ame]

[/ame]

[Worrazen]

I'm wondering what about sound sytem, many times when watching in F2 view and changing the view with mouse the engine sounds are interrupted, the pop-in and out, the system kind of thinks I moved the camera too far away, also explosion sound effects are too late sometimes, and when planes hit the ground there's a slight freeze always, lost frame, so explosions and collisiony don't really happen very smooth, including missile hits, this probably has to do with animation stuff, updating this will make the whole game look better including older maps, is this maybe planned to be fixed part of the planned conversion of the old caucus map into "T4 engine" ?

 

I'm running Sandy Bridge E I7 3820 OC to 4.0 GHZ with around 40-80 FPS, on an Asus P9X79, with the AMD R7 370 GPU.

Edited March 8, 2016 by Worrazen

[SkateZilla]

If Aircraft is Super Sonic, when camera is in front of Aircraft there will be no sound.

[Worrazen]

If Aircraft is Super Sonic, when camera is in front of Aircraft there will be no sound.

 

Oh, well yes I'm new, I got much to learn.

 

I don't want to say how it should or shouldn't be, but would it feel better if there was a slight fade ? Sometimes the 3D Sound dynamics don't quite kick in and it feels like a cliffhanger cut-out so it feels poppy, but I don't want to appear as an expert, just a thought I had in mind since the very beginning as I couldn't figure it out.

[BlackLion213]

I think the future Nimitz could be CVN-74

 

 

 

Thank you, I saw that a few months ago - looks promising. The only thing is that I am an ardent Tomcat fan and the LNS Tomcat is going to be set in the mid-80s (F-14A) and mid-90s (F-14B). The USS John Stennis wasn't operational till ~1998 (first real deployment).

 

Other carriers of the same class (especially USS Nimitz, Ike, Carl Vinsion, and TDR would fit in better with the Tomcat).

 

Of course, I'll be happy with what I can get. ;)

 

-Nick