Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Actually, in reviewing your figures I was relieved to see a bigger difference between the Maverick and the 38 / 82. I mean... Holy cow.

 

In the original link the 82s were about 3/4s of the 65... which made me think... hmmm- maybe I'm ripping myself off. More mavs it is!

 

Then in your corrected post- .14 for a 38 and .82 for a Mav- okay... NOW it's worth it!

"ENO"

Type in anger and you will make the greatest post you will ever regret.

 

"Sweetest's" Military Aviation Art

Posted
How heavy is a tactical nuke?

 

Let's do the math (well maybe in some othe thread). :) What yield?

Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two.

Come let's eat grandpa!

Use punctuation, save lives!

Posted

Close formation or wide spread?

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Posted (edited)

Even in the sim I went from 4 mavs to 2 to fly lighter. It is a pig really, getting altitude is a nightmare, let alone when you're overloaded.

 

BTW the Tornado can carry 12 brimstone missiles, but in combat (eg over Libya) it seems it was mostly loaded with 3 on a triple launcher: http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/dual-mode-brimstone-missile-proves-itself-in-combat/

Edited by tflash

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

I remember they use to load 4 fake nukes on the A-10's in Alaska

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:D

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...