All Activity

I do not know if this has come up. It is a shame because most of the Asrock boards seemed to do well in the HUB tests. Asrock Megathread on reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/ASRock/comments/1iui7lx/9800x3d_failuresdeaths_megathread/ Asrock forum on reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/ASRock/

I think that an official roadmap on the main DCS website for both DCS core and the various modules made by ED would be a nice addition. Not everyone has the time to dig through the forums to find a current roadmap for what they are looking for. It would be so much easier to quickly find exactly what roadmap you are looking for in one place.

Sorry if my english is not up to par to report this because I'm not familiar with the terminologies with the different tracking and pointing methods. If you order George to search the area, in this case "forward area", then slave him to a point before ordering him to scan for targets on that point. The TADS/George will get stuck in a looped glitch. It wasn't like this prior to the latest patch, I think, but definitely there is a bug. Shown here in a unlisted video (youtube). Need the link to access or watch it embedded here: The track file came from the flight on the video. Track and mission file attached bellow. Simple Caucasus mission in air start made in mission editor. The issue can be shown on the track or verified in less than 2 minutes. Steps to reproduce: Forward area search. Point, using the button you order George to fire a weapon - > Slaving George to the current point of interest, in this case Waypoint 1 where there are a few armored vehicles). Search, using the same button above, after TADS is slaved to the POI (waypoint 1 in this case). Glitch occurs like George is changing TADS FOV indefinitely while scanning the forward area at the same time. This does not occur if you order George to slave the TADS to a point from a fixed TADS or with TADS somewhere else but searching the forward area. Scan at point after forward area search bug.miz Point Bug.trk

You are complicating things unecesarily, terrains have a single kneeboard section each and that is more than enough, each mission can already have their own kneeboard (plus one for each aircraft type) so more than enough already ... having DCS "remember" my sticky dividers, per aircraft, is what's still missing.

I would need to be a 3-dimensional sorting at least: per aircraft per terrain per mission .. plus with an override per sorting criteria: all aircrafts, all terrains, all missions

I mean... sudden death is something that can occur on a person, but is the CPG (or the AI buddy on the Apache) meant to be on the system failures table? I thought it was related to the aircraft only. Not even ordinance are affected by the random failures, afaik. Restarted the mission and it was fine, meaning it most likely was the random failures being triggered. Random failures was turned on.

Does anyone happen to have instructions for setting up a GTR Motion Platform with SIMTOOLS to DCS? I am struggling! Thanks in advance!

I would be happy with just a small improvement of the "sticky note page divider thingy" .... to have DCS memorize my KB dividers on a "per aircraft" basis, from one DCS session onto the next.

Hi, it's actually being based on a German F-104 G Consortium.

Control over the failures for the F16 is not implemented yet in that tab. Not a bug, just a feature to yet be created.

My Grandads aircraft taking on fuel. Experimental days. That one’s still submerged in Norway. Can we have both please

Thanks SERP International for recording our event and to everyone else that participated! Hope to see everyone at the next public event! https://www.youtube.com/live/h8IbvRtC8OY *Please note that this group is led by a group of flight enthusiasts, and none of us claim to be experts!*

Thanks SERP International for recording our event and to everyone else that participated! Hope to see everyone at the next public event! https://www.youtube.com/live/h8IbvRtC8OY *Please note that this group is led by a group of flight enthusiasts, and none of us claim to be experts!*

I am linking to the part where they turn a 4090 24gb into a 4090 48gb. I think I read that they got the funding for the movie that they want to do. Wonder if team green mgmnt is even aware or cares? And finally, if a shop like this can add that vram to a 4090, why do we have to pay such premiums?(Sarcasm)

From reviews on different sites and some YouTube ones I've heard both ways. Kind of why I'm waiting until fall/winter to pull the trigger to see if it's just a QA issue with first run headsets. It's the Pimax way. I'm familiar with Quadviews, I run it on the QPro add it had eye tracking as well. I've seen mixed reviews on edge to edge clarity of the lens itself. Meta has some of the best lenses out there.

They are concave mirrors, but to which degree, I don't know. The programmers adjusted the values to give the best rear viewing possible. As seen in my screenshots

Can we please get something new that's not the same thing we have had for years. KC-10(Highly requested many times), KC-46, A330 MRTTs(MPRS style and used by many countries), YY-20. I'm sure others will chime in with other aircraft. Aerial Refueling has been crucial in aviation for decades, lets add some flavor for the community. Instead of the same thing over and over again.

I personally don't know how to add static objects to the hangar deck, but it is there.

They are aware of the issue and have said that there is no easy fix for it, so I wouldn't expect in the near future. I do have hope that some day out of the blue they will figure out a solution and drop it.

The edge to edge clarity on the Crystal Super is excellent! I have not heard that it is not good before! That argument against the Super is surprising to me. The lenses are very, very good. «Blurry outside the center of the lense» ?? Nope! Not at all. The negative things I’ve heard about the Super is that some have had tracking issues, and from the first batch of headsets some mura from the panels. I have not experienced any of this myself. But, I only do «sit down» experiences with my Super, flying or car games, so I don’t move around in my room. So no tracking problems for me. If I was to move around in my room I would prefer a WiFi connected headset like my Quest 3 anyway.

It fixed it. Since i did so many full repairs of DCS, i figure that the problem was within Windows itself. Just moved everything else except windows and DCS to another drive, and in a couple of hours i set up my pc once again. It's not a long lasting solution tho, since i had the same issue before, and fixed it in the same way. I know I'm not that helpful, but that practically means that the issue is not hardware related, since no components have been changed and it works perfectly now. Tell me if it works for you guys aswell, and, if you manage to find a better solution.

HI, II fly VR (Oculus 3), do not use TrackIR right now, I have also uninstalled the SW. But sometimes I use TrackHat which I have also unplugged it for troubleshooting purposes. While flying now and then (but rather often) I get "TrackIR disconnected" message, then "TrackIR connected". This will always deploy the landing gear of any airplane module. From the dcs.log i can see this event, below (and Attached the dcs.log file). Interesting if anyone has experienced this..... 2025-08-17 21:09:25.816 INFO APP (Main): Device plugged: [HID] HID-compliant device 2025-08-17 21:09:26.886 INFO INPUT (Main): created [TrackIR] 2025-08-17 21:09:27.773 INFO APP (Main): Device unplugged: [HID] HID-compliant device 2025-08-17 21:09:28.794 INFO APP (Main): Device plugged: [HID] HID-compliant device 2025-08-17 21:09:29.928 INFO INPUT (Main): created [TrackIR] 2025-08-17 21:09:32.874 INFO Dispatcher (Main): Stop 2025-08-17 21:09:33.903 INFO TERRAIN (Main): lSystem::CleanScenes() 2025-08-17 21:09:33.903 INFO WORLDGENERAL (Main): TerrainUtility:: updated in parallel: 29385, updated in the main thread: 0 2025-08-17 21:09:33.922 INFO VISUALIZER (4220): Stopped collection of statistic. 2025-08-17 21:01:40.000 ERROR_ONCE (): dcs.log

More assets are welcome, as are more modules.

Hi clean install of the latest version 25.8.1 solved the issue.

@Mainstay Be patient. When Heatblur start dropping hints and breadcrumbs of upcoming release information for the Intruder, I am certain a section for the Intruder will be created