All Activity

up

Two weeks.

Those two sure are among the prime examples of a) yes, it seems to take years and b) interestingly, in the years between showing off the model in a newsletter and them actually being implemented, very little on them changed. I bet it takes a while to make these things, but the very examples you picked are also showcasing how that is doubly true when ED is involved...

So I found a topic which explains how to add specific callsigns to a aircraft's/helicopter lua : Yet for the CH-47F I can't find the right lua file and/or entry in the lua file so I might as well make it a wish : Please add some dedicated callsigns for the CH-47F, both text and voice, to be used in missions. I already found a couple that are still being used for US CH-47F's : - Airwolf - Denim - Freight train - Hooker - Hurricane - Kong - Mustang - Nomad

There is a thread asking about it up there in the MiG-29 area and they were rather quick to point out that they 'were experimenting with it' and there is no intention of making it an actual feature there, let alone a general feature. Not exactly beating certain allegations, but it is what it is.

Someone should remember that most of the latest AI units added to DCS World are third-party and external teams (Currenthill and others), and much of it has been red. ED has a list of what it was working on, and yes, only the B-1B, B-52 and T-90A have been added from that list. You only need to look at the Unofficial Roadmap, where I always check when there are changes to DCS World AI units, from many years ago). The ED list: C-17 il-38 May SH-60B Tu-142 Tu-160 Red and blue infantry S300PS S300V 9P129 AMX-56 Leclerc C1 Ariete And about the "missing" stuff, has many post talking about them.

Thermo baric explosion (Big air bubble effect with a tiny explosion)

Mistake on my part, noted, Now fixed. Thanks for the excellent feedback, we really appreciate it! Thanks LG

Well well well.... Looks like ED is n fact experimenting with the feature for Fulcrum at least - check out the last 10 seconds of DCS MiG-29A Fulcrum Early Access Launch video...

чтобы было как в реализации ЕД импульс бланкирования должен длиться весь такт работы БЦВМ а этого нет. Указание на однократное срабатывание СПО от навигационного оборудование прекрасно ложится в канву того что синхроимпульс потребляет практически все радиооборудование самолета.

Any chance of a summary for those who don't habla?

Коллеги, кто какие значения выставляет на прицеле при стрельбе нарами, с подвесной пушечной установки, встроенной пушки, естественно при стрельбе на глаз?

I do the same and focus on what my eyes/mind perceive without chasing numbers.

There's no Redforce team in ED; there are several teams that build modules, and we've never been told there was a specific one. Remember, before the Ka-50, we had to go back to the Belsimtek modules to find anything red aircraft... so that team could very well have been making blue modules without a problem. The only thing that's clear is that ED has seen fit to convert several FC modules to FF (Mig-29A/F-15C), but remember, we don't know the future plans after the F-35 and it's quite possible that it will be more blue than red (I dont talk about WW2, that other diferent team). Also, seeing that the Mig-29A was a Belarusian version, I have a strong feeling that they're going to go in that direction if they try to make another aircraft, and the next one will very possibly be the Su-27P FF or perhaps an A-10A FF. I don't expect a Mig-29S at the moment, much less something more advanced, unless there's a surprise. I also wouldn't rule out ED switching to early or mid-Cold War aircraft if it starts discussing Korea or Vietnam, when the round Earth arrives, instead of switching to a 2010 "red" aircraft.

Yeah... mostly busy with tons of stuff for Bluefor

UP

От того что оно есть, не значит что оно функционально в реальном самолёте. Если только не: "можно покрутить, помогает расслабиться"

Yes, we only have Ropucha, we must have more landing ship from both side

I not think that absolutely new cockpit will be easier for dev. Also diferent weight alignment and moments (nose gun heavier and change weight to nose) Also absolutely new systems for bombing. But also good idea.

Видимо, потому что это колесо есть

увы нет ! но походу я нашел чем руководствуются разработчики сделав ВЫКЛЮЧЕНИЕ СПО при включении БРЛС см регламент от 82го года с дополнением за 85й PS хотя эксплуатанты говорят что светиться как новогодняя елка ,что свидетельствует не о выключении ,а о не правильном согласовании Н019 с Л006

Let's see... is this post number "35" asking for red AI units? Because repeating the same thing over and over again isn't going to change plans. I understand that the Su-30 3D models are very old, but ED already said that when they have time, they would improve the old Lomac/FC 3D models... meanwhile, they're on other matters. It's more likely to come from a third party than from ED at this rate. EA-6B will be "claimed" by Heatblur... on a future. J-10 and others chinese aircrafs will coming by Dekka (If has that plans). Su-30 and others variants by ED surely. Remember that making these assists can take years, read the B-1B and the B-52... this isn't like setting up an assembly line and having it tomorrow. Does anyone remember that the Eurofighter and F-35 will come in FF modules? They're not only AI units as the incoming A-6E/KA-6D.

Сделайте уже инструменты для создания среднеразмерных филдов (ВПП по 500-600м) которые не будут проваливаться в рельеф, а так же добавьте огни синего, белого, оранжевого цветов для оборудования этих самых филдов и верт площадок. Как пример, Агой, которого нет на карте, но при установке на поверхности статиков аля палуба Таравы, которая супер маленькая, эти палубы просто встают лесенкой. Поэтому нужно что то другое. Для устранения конфликтов с рельефом, возможно есть смысл сделать несколько профилей ВПП, аля выпуклая, вогнутая, под уклон. В этот же список можно воткнуть наземный юнит аля БПРМ, который можно было бы настраивать как РСБН и ПРМГ юниты для МиГ-29. Спасибо.

Hey guys, please excuse if this question has been answered before, but I did not read all 8 pages of comments. I have an issue when using the radio commands, e.g. "flight". When I say "Flight, cover me" only a F4 or F1 button press is invoked without being in the radio menu, which brings me to an external view. What am I doing wrong? Many thanks in advance!

There’s a reason so many people complained for years about the F-5 cockpit, and that the “remaster” was so poorly received: it was ED’s chance to fix it, but instead they decided to put a fresh coat of paint on it and call it a day. You can mitigate the issue (in the F-5’s case) by using outlandish IPD values but you can’t completely fix it