All Activity

Прочитал )) только не понял что ответить ? Разве что могу повториться . При ведении ВБ это изделие бесполезно . Оно не дает никакой situation awareness, но больше мешает . Сразу при входе в зону боя при велючении СПО получаешь набор звуковых и световых хаотичных эффектов, и если там еще не один самолет а пара или две и еще у тебя ведомый , то эта цветомузыка еще веселее. В процессе боя что либо оценить по ней не представляется возможным. Поэтому лично я всегда выкручивал звук на минимум и выключал режим обзор , чтобы видеть только режим захвата . Хотя при ведении боев с однотипными целями это и так понятно , когда тебя захватили . Более менее адекватно СПО работает с ЗРК . Много летали на подыгрыш ПВО и если их не много одновременно включалось , то в принципе можно было что то оценить . Но это опять же в простом полете , максимум при выполнении какой нибудь змейки . Не знаю как бы она мне помогла , если бы я знал что ракеты могли в меня полететь . Это был бы уже другой полет . Поэтому мы все эту цветомузыку изучали и знали , но в основном только то что по ней ответить на контроле готовности и все к этому относились очень скептически. Так что многие в реальной жизни ее никогда или почти никогда вообще не включали .

I have encountered the same fog effect in some standard missions, where the aircraft is already at a certain altitude. Although the fog disappears after a few seconds and never happens again, it is still looks strange.

If a target doesnt appear on the radar screen then there is nothing Jester can do to change that. Your aircraft positioning determines the picture quality. If they dont appear on screen then your position isnt good enough. That said, a more clever "look here" thing is planned. As Ivandrov said, the F4 features "pilot assisted" radar modes, you should make use of them. Boresight mode lets you lock something by putting pipper on it visually, that sounds like what you need.

He can. The tldr would be "git gud". Its most likely a mix of expectations and improving aircraft positioning. A few things to consider: * dont go look-down * dont approach a fighter head-on, go sideways to improve RCS significantly * dont place them at a distance equal to your altitude or they vanish in the altitude line * dont place them next to clutter in terms of distance to increase the contrast * make sure there are no mountains or other terrain next to them or right behind them from your perspective * (if they are hugging the ground, forget about it, you wont get them on screen) * if all things go well, expect to get a fighter on screen at about 15-25nm, that gives you time to shoot maybe one missile before you are in heater range (for larger targets its rather 25nm-40nm)

His default scan behavior covers 10k ft up and down, he will usually cover everything relevant without you having to tell him. The Jester Wheel allows you to focus on the expected area but it will not really allow you to reach a spot that you wouldnt have reached with the default scan already. The antenna symbol looks like it only changes a bit but his ~3° up/down cause already a change of ~10k ft at 30nm.

We just want an F35 with its full warfighting capabilities. Its barely any more effort to make a 3F because its just a 2B/3I with less FLCS restrictions and mostly more of the same weapons. Eg. SDBs are operated the same way as JDAMs and we get more AMRAAMs and external stores. We get it, you just really want ED to make a Block 1# F35.

Buenos días...tengo una duda y agradecería cualquier ayuda..cuando el ATC te dice la presión barométrica en el campo te lo indica en Hectopascales y el Mirage lo tiene en milibares...como puedo hacer la conversión de lo que te dice el ATC a como ponerlo en el Mirage?...Gracias

Up

UP

One of the advantages of the Sabre over the MiG-15 was that its ailerons remained effective at and above Mach 1, while the MiG lost almost all control authority due to increased stick forces.

I'll try and reproduce this in a simple single-player mission, for all my DCS experience is with multiplayer servers. But to answer your question, yes, I did the basic checks (laser code, etc.).

Regarding the liveries, there are normal and roughmet files in the directories but strange choices (for example only the right wing) This may just be leftovers of the default ones, I could not check Overall, congratulations, it's very nice and I'm eager to fly the Lancaster

Hi, Playing DCS since KA-50 (almost 2 decades ago) I have witnessed the foreseen and the unforeseen. Now, I know that the DIRCM is basically a system designed to spot the plume of missiles within a given FOV and interpret them as real missiles or not within some given false positive error. It's purpose was to detect IR missiles although I doubt that it's able to differentiate between radar or IR missile in reality simply because it looks for a plume pattern left behind by any missile. So it basically warns you about it. After detecting that a missile is incoming, a rapidly rotating laser with a given divergence and beam intensity will eventually pass over the IR missile's seeker head, rapidly and repeatedly heating it up, up to the point of making it become completely unable to distinguish any heat signature anymore, because IR missile's seekers are highly cooled to be able to track heat targets better. The cooler the seeker, the better the lock, the hotter the seeker, the weaker the lock. That's why IR missiles are so limited in range..., not because they can't reach far. Just look at how now the IRIS-T is modeled in DCS. AT LAST..., after arguing so many times with so much logic and personal proof years behind, everyone was laughing at me until they found out that I was right, that missiles should have much more reduced drag than they had and so now we can see the IRIS-T, with better CD vs AOA tables implemented, that it has greater flight range than an AIM-120C once had (years ago). BRAVO! You guys finally found out what I was saying back then about the too high AA missiles drag at low AoA and too low drag at high AoA...! So, back to the subject, the faster a missile will fly through the air, at a greater rate it's seeker will heat up, because these are the laws of physics. So, even if an IR SAM missile can travel even past 10km down range, say... a MIM-72 Chapparal missile or IRIS-T, it's seeker will heat up in less than 4km high enough to lose the track on the locked heat source. The DIRCM does just that, it heats the incoming missile's seeker at a fast rate. Basically, if a missile is close enough to a DIRCM equipped aircraft, let's say less than 1km away, the DIRCM will first lose some time to react and start pointing the laser in repeated motions over the missile's seeker and missile will be close enough to not loose the lock on the heat source before it's seeker is hot enough. At least, that's how I find it pretty simple and logic to see. From too close, no DIRCM will be able to stop any IR missiles due to those key details. From further away, a function of time will greatly reduce an IR missile's PK without the use of any flares..., just simply because the chance of losing lock from random factors will occur. With basically a function of atmospheric temperature, missile speed and time of DIRCM actively heating a missile's seeker, there is a range between the launch site and the target after which that missile will lose lock 100% of times. Basically the PK becomes ZERO for good! I don't know what happened after X latest update, but one year ago I could have more than 90% of the missiles that were coming from the aft hemisphere of my Su-25T go by my plane without hits and today almost 0% of those missiles do that anymore. Now, with or without DIRCM, from far or from close, when an IR missile is coming for the Su-25T, it hits it like the DIRCM doesn't exist. Ah..., and by the way, in the past the DIRCM was only affecting IR SAM missiles, AA IR missiles were 0% affected by the DIRCM anyway. Now even the IR SAM missiles are not affected by the DIRCM? What is the new logic now? Thanks!

The last couple of logs haven't been DCS game crashes per se (there's no stack trace and list of dlls, it just stops logging), and the previous stack traces which were throughout all the others aren't showing up. This indicates that Windows itself is killing this. Ran the latest DxDiag report back through the log analyzer. Similar to previous with some notable changes, i.e. it is no longer highlighting that dll error that had showed up before. Windows Error Reporting (WER) Your system crashes with Bluescreens. The following kernel-events have been detected: ATTEMPTED_EXECUTE_OF_NOEXECUTE_MEMORY,VIDEO_DXGKRNL_BLACK_SCREEN_LIVEDUMP,HYPERVISOR_ERROR,IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL,KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE Remove any overclocking (including XMP)., (you've said you've tried this already) Run SFC and DISM to check your Windows., Check for any updates of your BIOS or chipset drivers., (you've said you've checked these already) Application Errors DCS.exe: c00000fd (edCore.dll) For the SFC and DISM commands open a command prompt as administrator and run the below two commands separately and then restart your PC. dism /online /cleanup-image /restorehealth sfc /scannow The DxDiag report shows the last 10 crashes/issues on your system. Most of these are BlueScreen events with codes 139 or 20001. Can be Googled to see what they related to, e.g. 20001 mentioned hypervisor, which aligns with the HYPERVISOR_ERROR in the above list. The two commands above may possibly help with some items if corrupt system files.

Does the Su-25 have afterburner? DIRCM impacted by engine RPM? Do you know what the DIRCM is first of all?

Use his Boresight mode for that. You can point at the visual contact with your pipper and he'll come straight up on radar most of the time.

Yes. He will scan mostly co-altitude and may steer the antenna up and down a little bit. If there's a significant altitude difference you'll have to tell him the expected altitude. So he can actually point the antenna that far up or down.

Hi, It seems it was actually a files corruption thing! I mean at least I suppose so, because I've asked a friend of mine to try disconnect and reconnect his internet while being in a mission and he tried multiple times and each time nothing happened..., no crash. I later found out that the "SAVED GAMES" folder from the user was named "DCS open beta" while for my friend it wasn't. After deleting all old files and afferent folders and reinstalling all files (600GB+) using the web installed, it no longer does that thing. So, everyone should know that files corruption can happen even if the REPAIR FILES feature is used..., it doesn't fix it. Thanks!

Decker- Apologies, we missed the discord link (that is the primary means of contacting us, and our virtual home)- https://discord.gg/spqRppZ7pK Happy to have a discussion re: the rest of your questions there!

it's a very old topic, nearly 2 years ago....i think it was Currenthill mods related, i've keeped some single mods and a pack of mods of the same country....maybe it was the problem...

Being born in Uruguay, I wanted to find something that represents me as such. In the Rio de la Plata area, we're often nicknamed "Los Charruas." They are extinct in the area, although some groups continue to claim their ancestry. My ancestors, as far as I'm concerned, come from Italy. Franchi. This is translated by Google Translator. Sorry for off-topic. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charrúas Al nacer en Uruguay, quise buscar algo que me representa como tal, en la zona del Rio de la Plata , nos suelen apodar como "Los Charruas". Los mismos fueron extintos en la zona. Aunque algunos grupos siguen reclamando su decendencia. Mis ansestros por lo que yo se provienen de Italia. Franchi. Esto esta traduciodo por google.

Yes, 100% you can do this in multiplayer.

Can you post a track if possible in a singleplayer setting. I just did mission 6 in the Red Flag 21-1 and was able to LST just fine with the JTAC and sniper pod. Are you setting the correct code in the DED for the LST Code (different from the Laser Code)? I've also buddy lased with it as well no problem. So definitely a track will help to see if it is a pod issue or user issue.

can`t wait for the flyable version

quit to desktop again DxDiag.txt Events251012-2.evtx dcs.log