All Activity

I disagree, if you look at the DCS shot there, you can barely tell there's an IR signature there. Now minimize the picture to what you would see in VR or at a normal zoom level in 2d - you´ve got yourself a nearly useless image, you can´t even tell the number of blobs there, let alone that they are tank

trying to get into following a kiowa as in a formation. Formation Flight / Intercept Choose which kind of formation fight you want to participate in. After you chose your buddy, they will appear straight in front of you, flying your heading. Close the distance and follow the lead helicopter No formation shows to Start in free flight / on ground hot me as Player...I choose another Kiowa as client. I takeoff and Kiowa 2 sits there with rotor spinning. Please advise. Thank you

Instead of relisting every argument written in the dozen similar previous topics, have you at least read one of them yourself before opening up this one?

As child, my first flight was in a C160 Transall in Fürstenfeldbruck. And in fact, extendind the map up to Munich would be great so that after a flight, we could go on the Oktoberfest or any Biergarten to drink a refreshing drink.

Who is the author of your Eurofighter mod? Version 1.1 of DCS was not an Open Beta, so now what are you looking for? A DCS OpenBeta version or a Eurofighter mod version?

Hi take a look here, I've made some correction of the original file. Tested with F-16, A-10CII and Mirage F1. Any bug or information for more accuracy welcome. Hope it will help you. But as told in the related post, DON'T FORGET TO BACKUP THE ORIGINAL FILE!

The replay system is being overhauled by ED (see newsletters). The system seems to have been made with SFM in mind. Today DCS is much more complex than it was when tracks were reliable. Tracks can still easily break. I'm currently working on a Warthog video that although having a simple mission, the track breaks continuity midway the mission on a 'area track' to 'point track' while being played 2 times now. Modules as the Viper and Hornet are much easier on tracks. The Tomcat frequently breaks tracks very easily (not talking about the jester menu bug on tracks). I've done full mission replays being successful from beginning to the end for more than 1h long, others break in 30 minutes time. As ED pointed out, the replay function is not 100% reliable as they are overhauling it. It should serve mainly as a debug feature. It is not a new thing. Tracks used to break back in 2014 too.

The insinuation that the maps are inadequate isn't a reasonable thing to say. As mentioned, I bought the NTTR map seven-years ago and have enjoyed it very much. I still use it often. Now while it might look dated in comparison to a map that came out this year, you have to remember it's also seven or eight-years old. And it still works as well as the day I bought it. Not everything is all new and shiny, though we might want it to be, but that doesn't mean it's inadequate. It just means it's an older map. I have all the maps and I fly them all and enjoy them all, even if they aren't all of equal "fanciness". And there is such variety and quality in the maps now that no one should feel left out given the offerings. I'd love to see the NTTR map get some serious love, and I'd be happy to pay for it. But in no way do I see the map as inadequate.

Ltterally just finished to play The Kerman Campaign from Ground Pounder and all work good for me, I've a lot of fun

If you are already using a Micro 32U4, why not just flash MMJoy2? There is a long thread about MMJoy here in the forum.

I'm looking for V1.1 or anything newer than 1.0.69.

Even on Lockheed Martin's video IR images are blurry compared to what we are used with previous Lightening pod. I agree that sniper pod IR image is a bit more blurry in DCS than real life footage (but only non XR), still not that much to be unplayable.

Thanks for the replies now I understand

I haven't jumped into the CH-47 yet, but it's working great in the apache. I'm currently fiddling around with the extra command lines to see if I can get the fuel state visible from the EUFD. If that's available? Great work BTW I'm absolutely loving it.

This was, as I orbited around 5/7 miles from the outpost. Another great campaign,so rewarding when see Unfortunately there're this negative result in M10 Part 1...oh well.I'm quite happy to have bought and played this ( and the Hornet's) Campaign. Thank you Sir

Thanks for the feedback mate. I think I'll make my own and use hamsters and hares. The animal feed will probably bee cheaper.

Fair shout - here´s more videos and shots from those vids - as one can clearly see ( no pun intended) the contrast difference is huge, and that's at around 12nm in couple of those shots in NON XR. Its as if our TGP has a layer of grease covering the lens.

На 92-м году жизни умер авиаконструктор, создатель штурмовика Су-25 и первый главный конструктор пассажирского самолета SSJ100 Юрий Ивашечкин. https://www.forbes.ru/society/545181-umer-sozdatel-sturmovika-su-25-i-pervyj-glavnyj-konstruktor-ssj100-urij-ivaseckin

I agree. It's a shame that adding an EWR to the group won't change a thing in vanilla DCS. Regardless, the higher detection range in a ~50° sector is nonsensical.

Hot air tube for windshield ventilation

Monopoly, unfortunately, is the key here. ED knows there is little if no alternative. I too think there's room for improvement especially if they commit themselves in specialized advance modules. Speaking out matters but ED should respond if they care

or at least the ability for the users to add points and routs by their own. Think here are enough people willing to do the job.

Terrain teams do not work on modules. thank you

I would pause the new dev and update what you have to adequacy, then turn new dev back on. ED may have over committed with f-35, Iraq, Fulcrum and others.