All Activity

It's not possible. However, you can add AGM-88 to the current F-4E by creating a custom weapons loadout (mod). If you don't know how to do it yourself there are downloads available. This is one example https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3338090/

Showing off independent mirror views and control: Basically the wish's been granted

Вроде же как добавили в М92 Asset Pack подобный девайс. Две версии - одна с огнями и одна без. Довольно яркий. NF-2 вроде называется.

Yeah, use more ChatGPT to prove your point...

Same problem here . No mods, still vehicles never move. The first 2 missions were really great, looking forward to fly the rest of the campaign. Cheers, Flo

Roger that! We had a meeting this morning about the tracking algorithm and CPU utilization optimization. The team is working on both, and we’ll ensure there’s progress in every rollout patch.

Doesn't mean you can achieve it in combat situation. It may very well be design limit.

Just FYI in case it wasnt clear, this subforum (DCS: Eurofighter) is not referring to any user made mod, it refers to the full fidelity module that Heatblur is currently developing

What about next Wags’s videos?

Just "watching" a track, doesnt tell you anything about whats wrong with the code in the background. Thats what they look at.

У-ф-ф-ф. Да менять её на совершенно новую смысла нет, достаточно тюнингонуть. Потому что хоть её в 2003 году и назвали PFM, но это не значит, что теперь она не имеет право на правки (право на правки ) и улучшения пока в игре не появился следующий уровень продвинутости лётной модели. Но как говорили сами разработчики, проще написать с нуля, чем лезть в код 2003-го года. Поэтому я так и сказал - заменить. Но также я сказал, что буду рад любым исправлениям. Заменят одну только 3D-модель, уже хорошо. Если полёт на Су-25 и в жизни представляет из себя такую же колбасню, то ладно. Но по отзывам (опять же могу судить только по отзывам с этого форума) летавших на нём, тряски на большой скорости нет. В игре же тряска какая-то невероятная.

Hello, At the moment, the Dump switch in the settings can only be placed on one button. So only a key occupancy with ON/OFF. It would be great if this one also got two separate occupancies. One occupancy option for ON and one for OFF. I have a change switch in my sim-pit for this, it is possible to use it first by using button9 and button9-off. But at every start, the switch automatically gets up, which of course wastes fuel. Have a nice flight!

With the Easy Communication option disabled, everything works for me. Can you give me a track file of the mission?

Thanks for confirming proceedures were the same... Not sure what I was doing wrong before but it works now

Interesting. The script uses the built in function to get the fuel, which is returned as a percentage (value zero to one). What I’m doing with the script is simply multiplying that with the total capacity that you set in the script. I’ll have a look to see what’s going on later, but what I’ll do is simple and you can try if you want. Set fuel capacity to zero in the script and then I’ve coded it to show the text in the mission as percentage instead of gallons, and it will give you an idea what’s happening. It almost sounds like DCS is giving a value of more than 100% fuel remaining if you are carrying the drop tanks, which I did not expect. I didn’t test for this, as my speed trials were with a clean configuration. If you get to it before I do, let us know what you’ve found. Thanks for the feedback

Просто надо с терминологией разобраться. "Поменять FM", о чем пишешь ты, - это замена текущей полётной модели на какую-то другую. Более продвинутой модели, чем PFM, в игре пока нет. Другое дело - внесение исправлений. Как, например, "поменять операционную систему" и "внести исправления". Это не одно и то же.

I'd like a way to reactivate the old F-4 in the mission editor. I'd like to have F-4Gs appear in a mission, and while the old AI F-4 could carry the AGM-88 the new one can't. Hopefully some day we get an F-4G but until then can I bring the old AI jet back?

Syrian Incident – BLUEFOR Coalition Status Update Coalition registration has reached capacity with 8 squads now confirmed. Additional BLUEFOR squads will be assigned a reserve role, ensuring operational readiness given expected weekend availability fluctuations. Reserve squads provide vital flexibility, maintaining campaign balance and momentum when primary teams are unavailable. We are pleased to announce that 16 squads have signed up for the Syrian Incident - dynamic campaign squads vs. Squads. To maintain optimal gameplay for organization and participants we are implementing a soft cap of 16 squads. Any squad registering beyond this number will be assigned a reserve role. We appreciate your commitment to Syrian Incident - Dynamic Campaign Squads vs. Squads. DCS experience at highest level!

They don’t look the same in real life because the flow structures themselves aren’t the same. What you see (length, thickness, “ropey” texture, breakup) is set by how each airframe generates and distributes lift and where the shear layers roll up into vortices. Why appearance differs by aircraft Lift distribution → tip roll-up strength. Vortex strength scales with local circulation Γ (Kutta–Joukowski). Airframes with more outboard loading (planform, washout, control-law scheduling) produce stronger, tighter tip vortices that persist longer and condense at lower ambient humidity. Planform & aspect ratio. Lower-AR, thicker, highly loaded wings (e.g., F-35) tend to form denser, longer-lived tip filaments; higher-AR wings with more even spanwise loading (e.g., F-15) generally yield broader, faster-breaking vortices under the same AoA/Nz. Leading-edge devices/LEX & chines. Jets with strong LEX/chines (F/A-18, F-35) generate leading-edge vortices (LEV) that interact with or overshadow tip vortices, changing the visible pattern (sheets, “fog banks,” twin ropes) versus a pure tip-only signature (typical F-15 in many regimes). Tip geometry & twist. Tip shape (raked/squared), dihedral, and washout alter the core radius and breakdown distance; that’s why some aircraft show thin, coherent “wires” far aft, while others show short, puffy trails that break down early. Compressibility & regime. At transonic/high-q, shocks and accelerated cores drop static pressure further, so condensation onset and thickness vary with Mach and control-surface schedule—again, airframe dependent. Persistence/visual thickness. Core pressure deficit and axial velocity set condensation envelope and entrainment rate. Strong, tight cores look like thick cylinders in humid air and remain visible well aft; weaker cores look skinny and dissipate sooner. Concrete contrasts (same weather, comparable AoA/Nz) F-35: Lower AR, high wing loading, chines/LEV interaction → longer, denser, more persistent wingtip filaments; visible even in relatively dry conditions. F-15: Higher AR, more even spanwise loading, significant washout → tip vortices appear but break down sooner; less frequent long “cables” unless humidity/AoA are high. F/A-18: Often dominated by LEX/leading-edge vortices and canopy/forebody mist; wingtip trails are not the primary visual. So the statement “there is zero visual difference” conflates a global humidity/AoA trigger with airframe-specific vortex morphology (core size, breakdown length, dominance of LEV vs tip, etc.). The physics guarantee different looks across types, and that’s exactly what photos and demo flights show. Implication for DCS A global effect tied only to AoA/Nz will miss these differences. Expose per-module parameters (e.g., reference W/S, AR, washout, outboard-loading coefficient, tip-geometry factor, LEX/LEV weighting, breakdown-length scale) and drive: Onset threshold (humidity × core Δp), Core radius / visual thickness, Persistence / breakdown distance, LEV vs tip contribution by regime. That would capture why F-35 trails look longer/denser, F-15 trails shorter/softer, and F/A-18 shows strong LEV structures even when tip trails are modest.

L118 Light Artillery falls through the ground when loading/unloading.

It worked! It worked after I put in another e-mail address, confirmed the address and then it let me in on my original account.

Worked for me just now Thx!

nullIt said 'invalid' Edit: Maybe I was too late to click on the link?

Hi, does anyone have a fresh Discord invite link please? Thanks!