All Activity

Работа закрылков, предкрылков напрямую завязана на СОС-3 кроме варианта с выпущенным шасси. Вот описание работы СОС и на втором их гидросистемы.

If you fly the 29 in a realistic manner you can get a decent range out of it. Problem is that people that fly DCS judge an aircraft by how long it can fly on full burner, 'cause this is what they do in game. They keep forgeting that real fighter pilots have missions, mission objectives and commanders. And sure Fulcrum might have short legs on a quake server, but this is not what it was designed for. Reminds me of that saying: this cat is a horrible dog, it simply won't bark.

игровое или какое? игровые находятся в директории самого DCS в папках для каждого модуля отдельно. В сети ничего искать не надо.

Ну плохо знает матчать Мэт, уж простите человека.

Okay I got this figured out. I did not know you had to purchase this separate with each module. Got it now and it works. Thanks anyways

I think it's awesome in VR, I love the physical visor. I'm currently messing around with making the tint less dark and tweaking the normal map to make it less "glare-y".

Trackfile LastMissionTrack.trk

That 30 km shot is way too optimistic. I’d say that’s more for the "old 27ER" , but even then, you’ll see the enemy notch your radar. I’ve practiced this in PvP, and the only way I’ve found is to fire an ER (which is kind of dumb) when you see the Sparrow lofting—cranking at that moment makes your missile arrive much earlier. We’re talking about something like 15 km. In the video, you’re cranking as if you were in an F-18. That doesn’t work here. You need to get closer. This is basically a "phone booth fight".

I keep overshooting as well, never get it perfectly trimmed out unless I let the autopilot do it.

Понятно, просто без VR, как ни настраивай, этой планочки не видно с нормального ракурса, и более менее видна она становится, когда уже совсем под козырек залазишь, и это прискорбно конечно( Вот тут еще сравнил, все равно в реальности не так этот бортик мешает.

Just went in and tested, and I can complete the AFCS test and get the Damper warning light to go off if I unassign my Sidewinder FFB2 from the pitch and roll axis, so definitely being caused by the Sidewinder. Wouldn't this test fail with any controller that was getting a tiny bit of almost imperceptable axis jitter as well? Yeah, need an option to disable controller inputs during BIT.

Would be sweet if they added the modernized variants of the polish air force. The NS 430 is 50 percent of the way there for the early 2000's just missing the NATO/modern radios. Unlikely ED ever does this though.

it seems to happen either 1. When I got to launch a mission to test it 2. When I load a new mission on a different terrain

Hi, can you please attach a track replay, you can save a track when you exit the mission during the debrief window. We need to check if you have the correct points setup for the airfield and are selecting that point in the nav panel thank you

I've made a post about this before, but with the MIG 29 a new variation has shown up Now this is quite niche. But also can't see this aa being hard to implement For those of us that make vidoes. A nice feature is the ability to expand how far the F1 camera can move. To give high quality cockpit views of the pilot and also details like throttle. This is something ED uses themselves for vidoes and trailers. However even within ED made modules there is no commonality when it comes to the pilot head. In the F16 and F18 they seem to work the same. You can move the camera about and the head mostly stays on. In the upgraded F5 there is no head in the F1 view. So this trick simply can't be used. Now with the MiG29 a new variable has shown up. In the 29 if you move the camera forward and turn it back on the pilot it works fine. High resolution cockpit and pilot. However if you move the camera back to get a over the shoulder view. The head mostly disappear. Untill you move the camera out past the canopy then the head reappear. I assume this is all simply some limits ED has set. And those limits are set differently in different aircraft. So I'm requesting all aircraft (at least those made by ED) will have the same limits (like in the F16/18 as those work well)

Beautiful! Is this still being developed?

People seem to think that AWACS and GCI in the real world work like in DCS: an all seing eye that gives you an F10 view of the battlefield. In '99 NATO agressiom against FR Yugoslavia, USAF pilots found the (British) AWACS next to useless, as it was giving them erroneous reports and, in their words, was making the entire situation more difficult. Same story on Serbian side with GCI, that was giving reports like: "Blue is comming from the west." No further instructions, no number and type of threat, no height and no speed. Just a one-liner that left the pilots use their imagination and wonder what to do with this information.

SRS has been updated to include the new Fulcrum

Up

I dunno, Eagle looks awful alot like the 25 in layout, down to almost identical air intakes. Do you have some references that back up your statement. I would be grateful.

Hi, it looks like the radar is set to head-on (high PRF) and then the target goes low aspect. It will of course be lost in this case. switch the radar to auto, or switch to Pursuit once the target goes low aspect

What is the path for the mission files? Below are the requested logs. dcs.log dcs.log.old

The Sept update has included a number of updates and I see that the manual has been spruced up, which is ace. At a high level, has this resulted in changes to procedures, and if so, which, eg: - cold start - take off - weapon usage - computer config - nav

В тех описании работы нет двух версий срабатывания. Носки вываливаются чуть раньше закрылков и те плавающие. Описание срабатывания подробное расписанное полностью по тех процессу. материал из МАИ и ему можно верить.