All Activity

Su-25T.rarШпаргалка в помощь Закинуть папку в C:\Users\.....\Saved Games\DCS\Kneeboard

Release date Friday, 3rd October then, German Unity Day? Would make for a nice present.

again?

I see. Understood. ....but in real life, as seen, the effect is just the same as in the F-15s. There is zero visual difference. F-22 flying in formation with it is not adequate because of the alpha and a low wing load at the flight regime. Obviously the 35 will generate vortexes easier because of the high wing load as you properly pointed out. The demonstration should have been at similar alpha, I think. A-10s are no comparison. DCS already takes into the account the alpha and without any change the F-35 will display the vortexes easier as the system automatically does it by default. You're right about that. In the visual realm, although very nice looking DCS is already, the effect should be upgraded globally. Reason is because they all look the same in DCS, and are too skinny where it should be a thick cylinder like streak as in very humid conditions. F-35s bellow: F-22 bellow: Visually, planes can do exact same visible vortexes effects. So it is where I'd say the effect should be upgraded globally. F-35s can do easier? Yep, I agree. Keyword: easier. F-35s vortexes are longer? Not necessarily. DCS Should have longer wingtip vortexes while its length varying based on air conditions? I agree with it too. I'm all for these improvements in visual goods. I've also noticed the delta winged aircraft are very difficult to generate such effect (rare to non existent in photographs) while in DCS it is easy to do on the M-2000C. So an upgrade/tweak on that front should be also looked at, especially with the Eurofighter coming up.

Virtual Desktop VD

Reset those columns to default. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

29 pilots IRL did get warnings and acted upon them(when SPO was operatuonal). There are some testemomies I alredy posted. I am preparing one with amraam miss at 5nm at the moment. In addition the story of Nebojša Nikolić needs update, since I found later interview and he did not fly in the straight line, but dodged amraam, sparrow and got hit by second amraam at 1.5-2nm range. His description of flight pattern indicates agressive snake-like flight while pushing for the merge.

А зачем? Он же и так PFM. Это если бы его делали full fidelity... Может быть, это даже случится при нашей жизни (в конце концов, там нет ни радара, ни сверхсекретного оборудования)...

Just set up my ET 5 and it works great in every module except for the Hornet and Viper. The column for head tracking is in the controls section but are blank. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!

Where do these assumptions come from? It seems to me that the only thing ED said was that the SPO-15 won't detect ARH missiles. I mean, it will only detect it a few seconds before impact. And as far as I know, a FOX-1 will not be detected only when, as you mentioned, it's launched via datalink and It might have something to do with range, because AIM-54 might be shoot that far away that signal is to weak for SPO-15 to detect and it will show up just as fighter and only when F-14 radar is doing PDI for AIM-54. The only other thing that comes to mind is that it will also not detect the R-27P/EP, which works similarly to the HARM on ground radars, but in the air. As for the interference of the SPO-15 by the radar, I don't think it is modeled because we have too little information.

?Sorry, but the translation was bad. What are VD applications? Or what does VD stand for?

Sadly, my prior statement is not true .. the battery still dies at around 15 minutes into the mission, as shown on this video (note the cockpit lights go out at around 15:00) And even tough Ground power is connected, it seems to not power all systems, I stop the mission when I realize that the radios are not powered. Guess I could redesign the mission around a Corsair with the engine already on, but it seems like more trouble than it's worth it, so I decided to shelve this mission until M3 fixes this bug Eduardo

Because that's what it is.

И возможность назначать ось на тормоза дать.

Извините, я имел в виду СУ-25Т. Если она работает правильно, то это я видимо не разобрался.

Можно ещё флайтмодель поменять.

I'm using the TM Warthog, and it works pretty well for the 130J. Even the reversers work well, when you assign a modifier and curves. First I made a custom detent for the reverse, but i found out it's not really needed when you use a modifier + axis curves.

To start off with, I'm going to ignore your irrational constraints and give the actual best advice. Then later on I'll give the fanboy advice for the CPU. For the GPU, a 5070 Ti should be able to be about to hit your performance targets. A 5080 is going to have about 15% more headroom, but it probably going to cost a lot more than 15% extra. Check your local markets for the price difference and think about whether you want to spend the extra amount. A 9800X3D or 7800X3D is going to be the best CPU. The 9800X3D seems to be much more overclockable, so it is probably worth the price difference. The Intel option is a 14900, which is slower and runs way hotter & is thus much more problematic with cooling. You'll also be buying a motherboard with zero upgrade potential for the CPU, while an AM5 motherboard will get at least one more generation. Of course you are free to make bad choices in life, but after already making the bad choice of getting the 10600 (a stopgap solution released because Intel couldn't get their 10 nm process working), do you really want to make another bad choice just because Intel used to do well for you? PS. Get 64 GB of DDR5-6000

Thanks for the reply, draconus. What do you call VD applications?

Awww, great, I loev this map, great news it aint abandoned! Thanks Specter!

When opening the speedbrake, the sound is stuttering and glitching. Thanks LastMissionTrack.trk

I've got a weird one I can't figure out. Recently changed ISPs. Other than the provider nothing changed on my home network setup side. I now only see about 300 servers instead of the reported 1700 that are online. I know the new provider used CGNAT and maybe that's causing it, but other than that I'm stumped. If I manually enter a server's IP sometimes it will say it's offline, and sometimes it connects just fine.

Yes, but you need an adapter: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSflUrHfM9AB0f-0WGyhOLxvXQNMr7E8TBDSYYJUBQ8kqaDC7g/viewform

Just a wild guess, but have you also checked the special settings for a custom cockpit livery that you maybe have to select?

I'll test it later Remove gunner_export_hook.lua