All Activity

Yes, I’ve tried the demo — it’s much better than the current version.

I don't think so, since you've gone off-topic. The topic is about a request to introduce buttons that would work step by step. The configuration topic is a separate topic, and it's worth discussing there if you have something new. Thanks, could you provide the title? I have several original pilot manuals—Yugoslavian, Soviet, German, and Polish—but they don't have that section. It does specify the 25 degrees, but as before, it's about the entire configuration. The buttons don't control the flap angle only, as some people believe, but the front flaps and rudder deflection. You have to look at it holistically. A friend of mine, a MiG-29 9.12 pilot, promised to check his notes and get back to me with more detailed information. At least he told me that the airframe configuration varied depending on the buttons.

@BIGNEWY Could you provide some insights into these error codes?

You seem to have misunderstood the game. Balancing isn't DСS's job. Every developer here strives to make the aircraft model closer to reality. And if that's how reality works, there's no point in distorting it to make things more convenient for some players.

Understanding how many inputs are modeled is important when considering this issue. Btw, which white paper? You mean Q&A or additional answer we got?

Pushed my V3 version as of 9/28/2025. Mission File is in the OP and updated in the user files. - Updated the rockets used. - Air Spawns are now set to Active pause. - Kneeboards updated. - Kneeboards are in correct order. - Adjusted the PID range so the targets are closer together for easier searches. - Units "Hidden" from MFD so they don't fill the CTRLM page. Might have been the old rockets that are no longer in DCS causing IC issues. I just updated the mission file.

Тестов именно в ДКС не нашел. По всякой синтетике - да, немного слабее. Но ощутимо сильнее моей 3070 Кстати, тоже надо поставить потестить А я драйвера последний раз обновлял года так два назад, так что явно что-то древнее

Yes, you're not the first one to ask about this. I'm already working on it. It's a bit tricky, but I already have a plan.

Thanks for your feedback! I'm working on it!

have you ever tried running a stress test on your components like OCCT?? If you have not maybe try and see if you get errors running the stress tests..

Try in this folder, not main game folder C:\Users\xxxxxx\Saved Games\DCS\Config\View

Я проверил через редактор, заспавнился верез горячий старт на полосе - всё так же молчит. Оповещение о невыпуске шасси и пуске ракеты не работает.

I read on Wiki that using the deck cannon was not possible with the under-hull auxiliary tank: "Original production MiG-29 aircraft cannot fire the cannon when carrying a centerline fuel tank as it blocks the shell ejection port. This was corrected in the MiG-29S and later versions" Is that true or not? I know that there is a hole through the tank to vent the gases from the APU, but this is the first time I've heard of this restriction...

@Mainstay If you could post track-file and give heads-up to moderators, posting as much data as possible (track-files) helps them out to correct the issue, we community are basically beta-testers when a module is in early access, so our data is important to get a module optimized.

Thanks @Schmidtfire I will try your method out, I was wondering how to make it work!

This may be resolved in DCS 2.9.20.15384; at least in one play through Zeus reports taking ground fire but no "getting hammered" message or mission failure.

@Calvin.Pimax The tech got back to me with the following " The DCS process exit codes were 3221225477 and 3221226505. In Windows, these codes indicate a memory exception, which suggests that DCS may have encountered a memory-related issue. Could this be due to in-game settings being too high? I recommend reaching out to the game developers and providing them with these exit codes for further assistance I did post this in the "game crash" section of the forums. Do you know who generally would handle a question like this? I dont notice any memory type issues with normal use and I didnt have any crashing issues before with the G2 or the VR1. I dont think the settings are too high Im still getting a very reliable 90fps out of this now since the last update... That has remained constant and there are now 0 performance issues like I had in the past. It run excellent until it crashes. Thanks

I tried deleting that file and repairing but it didn't work did you alter your default view by any chance?

@silverdevil I submitted a ticket to Pimax and their system includes automatically uploading a bunch of logs. I got this reply from the tech. "The DCS process exit codes were 3221225477 and 3221226505. In Windows, these codes indicate a memory exception, which suggests that DCS may have encountered a memory-related issue. Could this be due to in-game settings being too high? I recommend reaching out to the game developers and providing them with these exit codes for further assistance" I have 64gb of ddr5. There is no noted system instability outside of dcs and pimax or pimax and halflife alyx which appeared to crash as well. There was no crashing issues with the G2 beyond the normal DCS issues which were very rare. The pimax tech suggested that perhaps a DCS person would know what to do with the "exit" codes I have no idea who might find that useful if anyone at all. It appears to be of little value but if you know or know anyone who might be able to further isolate an issue let me know I can direct that to them. Thanks

They probably never do it for FC modules, but when the FF Su-25 drops, I expect to see it, even if I've never used it.

Unforunately I'm away from home for a couple of weeks and I've forgotten the specifics. It's been a while since I did it. Check out the pdf in the first post there. I seem to remember something about the "pressed" function doing it. See chapter 5.8 in the pdf.

Since it was the easiest to make without properly modelling it, that's what it feels like at this current moment, and how most of this topic is being ignored. There are so many documents and SMEs that proves the complete opposite that what is implamented. I would rather have the "chaotic" readings in HPRF, and properply working RWR in MPRF Insted of being blasted by an aircraft that we don't even know that is locking. Currently a MiG-21 has more SA than a way more advnaced MiG-29. But hey, more importantly that all other jets have magic rwr that detects things that it shouldn't even, but the SPO can't even work with it's radar on (that was designed to operate it)

Thanks @Devil 505! Awesome pictures @ViolentNomad!