All Activity

im sorry for taking my frustation on you and your team with my post, i understand that in the end the real problem is DCS that keeps changing the core functionality and creating new bugs. so many campaigns and missions that suffer from this, i wish that that we could play a campaign for a older version of DCS so that we played as it was design in the first place. keep up the good work.

Also, more importantly, f14a/b seems only allows you to do computer target bombing(ccrp) at least at 1,6000 feets, be make sure to climb to that altitude, otherwise it don't designate

any new info on this world/global map after that news letter? May be the 3.0 will feature it

Thank you all for the answers!

Hi all, Unfortunately, this last DCS Update broke the LUA Console of my DCS-BIOS setup. It established communication with DCS, but the console commands are ignored. I'm not knowledgeable enough to fix this myself, so for now I will install as a workaround, a small prior-version DCS Core with just the Marianas map (to save space) and the aircraft I'm currently flying (T-45C User Mod, F4U and M-2000C), and run it only when I need to learn the parameters and indicators of a DCS aircraft. Eduardo

I can't believe all this hasn't been made into a mission or campaign yet.

Does anybody else have a rudder that jerks to the left or right suddenly out of the blue? I know people have been complaining about her controls and trim, but I'm wondering if it's my Virpil stick and base(which I know are slightly off). Thanks.

Indeed, and the Mini Updates thread hasn’t gotten an Update in almost 3 years…

Today, 27July2025 I updated DCS and my graphics card drivers and have not been able to launch DCSdcs.log. I have researched a few similar posts and 1) in my saved games options.lua I do not have the "Launcher" line item to set from 'true' to 'false' 2) I have done a cleanup and slow repair on the within the bin folder (not the bin-mt folder) 3) I deleted the contents within the fxo and metashaders2 folders (I left the empty folders in the location) & 4) I am trying to avoid renaming my saved games folder name to minimize the other actions that would need to happen to transfer bindings, etc. Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance. My comp specs are: GPU 3080ti (Nvidia GeFrce RTX) CPU: intel i9 10th gen 10850k 3.6Ghz RAM: 64GB

Set them as Slider instead of axis. Also keeping the stick in your lap to force the tail wheel on the ground does help, but you always need to be gentle with wheel brakes.

And production started in February 1944.... Again, for every other FW-190A that would mean first deliveries would have been in MARCH. They were not. Factually All FW-190A8's did have two additional access doors. One of them is even labeled for GM-1, lol. You can look at any FW-190A8 and see both access doors. Find a single FW-190A8/R4 in service anywhere or anything that contradicts Technical Description Nr 284 in regards to re-engining a FW-190A8 with a TS engine. The R4 designation existed to denote other variants receiving a TS engine.

Axis. Do I have to adjust it in some way ? VKB Gunfighter, Slider 2

Not sure that more than 6 months is briefly.

The one where it was determined that there's gonna be a need of two additional access doors for GM1 installation (as well as a reconfiguration of the oxy-bottles, which you seem to not care about), which you claim were in all 190A-8s and which halted delivery for two months. Report dated 4.4.44, first loss 8.4.44 R4: "Entered service 12.44" - so after which the designation was supposedly dropped?

I'd gladly fund the creation of a new DCS Module if I won the lottery XD Heck, such a team might have the first versions of the module within a year. That said, in my original statement, I did say IF. And it's also dependent on what happens with the legal teams.

I don't quite understand why they publish a roadmap for the F-16, F-18, and AH-64 with features they plan to implement. And then continually update this list as soon as a feature is implemented. But that doesn't exist for the Mi-24.

Why on earth would they do that? You repeatedly writing that until you're blue in the face won't make that happen. And, you yourself keep commenting on Ron's "inflated ego". I think you have a better chance winning the lottery, then YOU can make it happen. Cheers!

Вроде разобрался, в какой системе координат вводить. Второй вопрос, а почему указание WPT через F10 и картридж не работают?

The date left me wondering what it was an AI asset for the SA asset pack or a module

First thing I’d do, the moment a “forum assistant” is introduced, is figuring out how to turn it off

You indeed don't, as Raven said. Think less pinpoint attack (which is what we pretty much always need in DCS) and more area suppression. Another thing to keep in mind here is that these kinds of attacks are not one-off missions, usually. Many of the unknowns and necessary corrections are done between the runs. Basically, you do this according to the table and then wait for the radio call on how your rockets landed and the next formation gets told: «Fire about 200m after passing that tree!»

Sure, one should always get effort points! [emoji1303] [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

To be fair. Isn't this sort of what AI is supposed to take care of? Why don't they enable the forum assistant when starting a new thread, to TELL you about existing threads. [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

that's where the lawyers come in to make it legal

If you believe what you read then there was briefly some agreement that then rapidly fell apart. And you also have to remember that an awful lot of RB's team were contractors who are now off doing other things.