Leaderboard

This is my tactic :smartass::pilotfly:

Tactics warm-up :D Consider the beautiful map below, a convoy is following the yellow trail at about 50 kph, you and your wingman in Ka-50 are to take it out, it will consist of 2-3 APCs, several trucks and cars and possibly a Shilka, also there may be Igla/Stinger troops in the convoy. How would you do it? Just save the image and draw on it to illustrate your plan :thumbup:

Oh no, bastard Ice is 41 today! How dare you?!! :D Be Good,Have Fun! :drunk: P.S. Thanks for invitation!

LOL, I'll take it as a compliment... I'll come in your dreams, while you doing your space stuff. Hard to believe you still doing same thing... :pilotfly: And you do have some spelling issues... (boo)

Movie is cool, I like CRT TV ;) @Poko24 - welcome back hyhyh :D

You should try Falcon 4.0 Allied Force, it is exceptionally good.

За разрывами в Стрим или к г-ну Уральскому :D

ViPer_svrd: "В разгаре лета по-моему ждать точно нечего"... Так сразу и нечего... :) За сторонних разрабов ничего не скажу - не знаю, а в ED работа идет своим чередом... Разработка новой 3Д-кабины Су-27 потребовала доработки, а по сути - переделки "внешней" носовой части. И это пошло на пользу модели - она стала еще точнее. По Су-25: "старится" базовый комплект текстур, на очереди доработки по кабине и ее текстурирование. По МиГ-29: этап подготовительных работ. Все впереди... Кстати, тов. ViPer_svrd, не спешите жечь компутер - новые технологии "рендеринга" сейчас только ленивый не использует, а количество треугольников на кубометр еще не показатель качества. "Геометрия" WIP-овского МиГа далека от реальной. Он, конечно, похож, но не более...

My favorite Steven Wright "I got food poisoning........ not sure when I'm gonna use it."

Согласен на все 100% по второму пункту... В машинах периода 2-ой Мировой не было СУВ и компьютеров, поэтому все приходилось делать "на глазок", а этот "глазок" действительно вырабатывается очень долго. Но то что иловец завалит опытного локонщика в ганзо очень спорно, пусть сначала разберётся с "наворотами" современного ястребителя. Да и техника ведения боя на пушках не та что мессерах и лавках....ИМХО конечно, ИМХО....:music_whistling:

I thought you traded Altitude for Speed, not FPS. Hmmm...:doh:

It would simplify my profile, to be sure. I wouldn't need to map out my TDC, or my lock/ unlock function. I'm online all the time, homie. :D

LOL whats an AWAX? :huh:

Me thinks you are uninformed. In the case of 169th I can say that the mission was made after client feedback to please everybody at the same time. Unfortunatly like everything else, most of the time what people (sometimes those who scream the loudest) want isnt what is best for all. They wanted more AWACS cover more SAM coverage, and everytime someone screamed one team had more defenses, the more defenses were added (rather than removed), and the cicle would restart from the other team. After a few hours of SEAD (its rather frustrating before you take enough time to discover what and how to hit, but it gets donne), or anti AWACS I have watched the team on the opposing side scream they had no cover that it was unfair, etc etc over and over again. -"oh my god we are blind now" -"You awacs is replaced faster than ours" -"You got better AWACS defenses than us" -"all we do is to defend AWACS" yadda yadda yadda... bolox... I flew for the 2 sides and I know better. Try the same. I will repeat... cover your assets, use the radar and dont rely on AWACS or SAM's too much. (they might be gone by the time you join ;) ) Frankly If I had time and talent to design missions I would put only essential defenses at key locations and no AWACS or put their orbit farther away no matter who screams the loudest. Then would add a script to rotate the mission from the moment any essential mission objectives had been met, like the destruction of EW, awacs or the removal of defenses at the home base of either side, or exaust avaiable aircraft limit. To be babysitted by AWACS or SAM's as if they were self sufficient is an utter and total mistake/nonsense. In essense, my point is: Mission builders do care what you have to say, but the collective player opinion on how it should be donne is what causes the simptoms your complaining. The community needs to be educated by the means of common sense from the designers (i.e. not being democratic at all :D ).

How many people are really worried that they are getting shot down constantly because someone multitasking with separate programs on another monitor? Seriously, how can this even be considered a cheat or hacking? Unethical? Yes. But a major cheat that completely unbalances the game? No. In a TDM server, intentionally Tk'ing awacs and switching sides has a greater effect on the game. (Lemming flight will have a hell of a time opperating that fancy thing called a radar) Print-screening has a greater effect on the game. (So lame anyone can do it) Sitting on comms with teammates has greater effect on the game. (God I wish we had built in VoIP) Drinking a fine double malt scotch while flying has a greater effect on the game. (While maybe not a scotch, alcohol has been consumed by a vast majority [of legal age of course] while flying online) The point is, you guys have blown this way out of proportion of the seriousness of the "problem". Which would probably entail a very small fraction of those who play this game, if of course people actually take advantage of luaexport enabled.

I'm always happy damnit! :mad:

Чую, самыми крутыми перцами будут ветераны "Рыцарей неба"... там даже прицелов нет )))

Естественно я передам свое видение этого процесса, а оно субъективно. Но обещаю что никаких ускорений и замедлений не будет. Ну и подобный ролик может сделать кто нибудь из локонщиков для сравнения.

yes you can (zoom for example) but u can also split the range of this axis in part which each a function of it assigned.. in my profile above its key 1 (NAV) whenever moved from one side over the middle to the next.

Most online servers that have both aspects of the mission have always favored the air to air players. Currently there are 3 (possibly 4) servers that include both a2a and a2g, and the VAST majority fly a2a preference in those servers. If you only have 2-3 people in the bomber wing, and the server(s) have 20,000 units on the map and 19,999 of them are SAMS or a/a capability, how much work do you think is going to get done? Personally I think the mission designers who put these missions up in the first place delve WAAAAY too deep into the mission building. These same servers are basically called air-quake servers. People just want to go online and score kills in these servers and thats it. You wont catch me doing a2g in a server that features both aspects unless Im on comms with a team.

This is silly; they can be fitted with versions of software that do not contain war reserve modes - I guess you might learn of the actual radar operating frequency and PRF, and perhaps some 'always on' ECCM features such as PRF and frequency hopping, but all that can be re/de-programmed. The Russians probably know more about the Typhoon that RF would probably provide already - Tiffies have intercepted bear bombers, and if you think that those bombers weren't packed to the GILLS with ELINT equipment to capture radar and radio signals, well ... ;)

Русификация Producer's Note #6 - Weapons Part 1 РЛЭ файла титров

Thanks to everyone! It's my drawings from scratch, I can give pencil outline if interested :)